인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
This paper aims to analyze the case of 2005Hun-Ka4 which the Constitutional Court issued on July 27, 2006. The subject matters of review are 1)the old Succession Tax and Gift Tax Law Article 13 Paragraph 1 Subparagraph 2 which stipulates that the succession property including the property given the person other than the inheritor within 5 years before the start of succession should be taxation standard of Succession Tax, and 2)Succession Tax and Gift Tax Article 28 Paragraph 1 which stipulates that the gift tax amount on given property added to succession property should be deducted from the succession tax amount. The Constitutional Court ruled that the above articles are not unconstitutional.
The conclusions of this research are as follows.
First, the judging proposition of Succession Tax and Gift Tax Article 28 Paragraph 1 can not be recognized. Therefore it should be rejected. The reasons are as follows.
1) The above article just mitigates the unconstitutionality of Succession Tax and Gift Tax Law Article 13 Paragraph 1 Subparagraph 2, not infringing the fundamental rights of the plaintiffs in the original case.
2) If the above article is unconstitutional, the legal status of the plaintiffs weakens.
3) If the unconstitutionality decision is made on Succession Tax and Gift Tax Law Article 13 Paragraph 1 Subparagraph 2, all the objective of the plaintiffs in the original case can be achieved.
Second, Succession Tax and Gift Tax Law Article 13 Paragraph 1 Subparagraph 2 can be considered unconditional. The reasons are as follows.
1) Estate duty method itself is contradictory to equal taxation.
2) Succession Tax and Gift Tax Law Article 13 Paragraph 1 Subparagraph 2 includes the property given to the person other than the inheritor in succession property, therefore more unconstitutional than estate duty method.
3) Succession Tax and Gift Tax Law Article 13 Paragraph 1 Subparagraph 2 does not contribute much to equal taxation, while making taxpayers' tax burden and more additional burdens heavier.
4) The constitutional basis is that Succession Tax and Gift Tax Law Article 13 Paragraph 1 Subparagraph 2 is contradictory to equal taxation.
The conclusions of this research are as follows.
First, the judging proposition of Succession Tax and Gift Tax Article 28 Paragraph 1 can not be recognized. Therefore it should be rejected. The reasons are as follows.
1) The above article just mitigates the unconstitutionality of Succession Tax and Gift Tax Law Article 13 Paragraph 1 Subparagraph 2, not infringing the fundamental rights of the plaintiffs in the original case.
2) If the above article is unconstitutional, the legal status of the plaintiffs weakens.
3) If the unconstitutionality decision is made on Succession Tax and Gift Tax Law Article 13 Paragraph 1 Subparagraph 2, all the objective of the plaintiffs in the original case can be achieved.
Second, Succession Tax and Gift Tax Law Article 13 Paragraph 1 Subparagraph 2 can be considered unconditional. The reasons are as follows.
1) Estate duty method itself is contradictory to equal taxation.
2) Succession Tax and Gift Tax Law Article 13 Paragraph 1 Subparagraph 2 includes the property given to the person other than the inheritor in succession property, therefore more unconstitutional than estate duty method.
3) Succession Tax and Gift Tax Law Article 13 Paragraph 1 Subparagraph 2 does not contribute much to equal taxation, while making taxpayers' tax burden and more additional burdens heavier.
4) The constitutional basis is that Succession Tax and Gift Tax Law Article 13 Paragraph 1 Subparagraph 2 is contradictory to equal taxation.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-018482535
