메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
에너지경제연구원 에너지경제연구 에너지경제연구 제2권 제1호
발행연도
2003.6
수록면
27 - 49 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Through the power industry restructuring in Korea, we witness various kinds of risks in the electricity market, and the need of risk management is emphasized. Government as a regulatory body should recognize the importance and usefulness of risk management market in the context of correcting a market failure. As shown in the empirical results, we could expect that the introduction of risk management market leads to price stabilization and market power alleviation in the electricity pool, resulting in the improvement of overall social welfare. The lessons from the California Crisis would be that the market-based approach using hedging contracts is more effective than the government's direct control such as the price cap regulation. There exist various tools for price stabilization and risk management, and the vesting contract in the form of CfDs (contract for differences) would be an appropriate option for Korea's situation considering the early stage of restructuring and the privatization of generating sector. In addition, if the domestic electricity spot market develops into a more competitive structure, we could consider the opening of electricity futures market, and the feasibility test of electricity futures contract proves to be reasonable in general. The government's role in risk management sector would be to induce more participants and competition into spot market. After vitalizing the spot market, the government could introduce the arc (over-the-counter) contracts first, monitor its progress, and then open the exchange-trade contracts later. In this stage, the government should minimize market intervention, and perform the function of market monitoring in a minimum sense.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 전력산업 구조개편과 위험관리의 필요성
Ⅲ. 위험관리시장과 정부의 개입 필요성
Ⅳ. 전력선물계약과 국내 상장 타당성 검토
Ⅴ. 요약 및 정책적 대안
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-321-018686454