지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Amongst the worldwide growing attention on the mental disorders caused by work duties, it is recently under discussion in Korea to acknowledging such disorders as work-related diseases.
Work-related mental disorders may be caused by a complex set of factors. They may arise either in the course of employment or in the combination of employment and non-employment factors. Seriousness of such disorders will also vary based on one's organic or non-organic disposition. Due to this complexity, The South Korea is so far yet to establish a concrete set of standards that judges work-related and non-work-related mental disorders. It is compared to its well-set standards on defining other disorders. None of the IACIA(The Industrial Accident Compensation and Insurance Act), the Enforcement Decree of IACIA, and the guidelines of the COMWEL(Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service) ever specifies rules of judging work-related mental disorders. Against this backdrop, the only way to conclude one's mental disorder as work-related is to apply the legal principles of case law, as they are commonly used in proving other work-related diseases. Although, we need to establish a separate set of case law principles for mental disorders considering above-mentioned complexity and diversity.
When defining the work-related mental disorders, one may be faced with the burden of proof. Unlike other work-related diseases, it is hard to prove mental disorders either in a medical way or in legal terms. It is against the principle of social law if we have workers bear an excessive burden of proof. If this is the case, mitigation of the burden or shifting of such burden needs to be considered.
In sum, it is recommended to introduce a set of standards or, at the minimum, to apply the legal principles of case law in defining work-related and non-work-related mental disorders, with supportive measures to reduce a worker's burden of proof. In-depth case studies and research will underpin such precedent-setting process.
Work-related mental disorders may be caused by a complex set of factors. They may arise either in the course of employment or in the combination of employment and non-employment factors. Seriousness of such disorders will also vary based on one's organic or non-organic disposition. Due to this complexity, The South Korea is so far yet to establish a concrete set of standards that judges work-related and non-work-related mental disorders. It is compared to its well-set standards on defining other disorders. None of the IACIA(The Industrial Accident Compensation and Insurance Act), the Enforcement Decree of IACIA, and the guidelines of the COMWEL(Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service) ever specifies rules of judging work-related mental disorders. Against this backdrop, the only way to conclude one's mental disorder as work-related is to apply the legal principles of case law, as they are commonly used in proving other work-related diseases. Although, we need to establish a separate set of case law principles for mental disorders considering above-mentioned complexity and diversity.
When defining the work-related mental disorders, one may be faced with the burden of proof. Unlike other work-related diseases, it is hard to prove mental disorders either in a medical way or in legal terms. It is against the principle of social law if we have workers bear an excessive burden of proof. If this is the case, mitigation of the burden or shifting of such burden needs to be considered.
In sum, it is recommended to introduce a set of standards or, at the minimum, to apply the legal principles of case law in defining work-related and non-work-related mental disorders, with supportive measures to reduce a worker's burden of proof. In-depth case studies and research will underpin such precedent-setting process.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 근로자의 정신질환의 내용과 판단기준
Ⅲ. 근로자의 정신질환 실태와 판례의 경향
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (40)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
정신질환의 `업무상` 재해 인정 기준 : 기존 정신질환 악화의 업무기인성 판단 과제를 중심으로
산업관계연구
2016 .09
-
형사절차상 취약계층 보호방안 : 정신장애자 처우를 중심으로
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2005 .12
-
형법 제10조 제2항에 대한 비판적 고찰-비교법적 고찰을 통한 현행 제도에 대한 분석과 입법안의 검토 및 제안을 중심으로 -
형사법연구
2013 .01
-
정신질환에 대한 일반인의 태도: Q방법론 적용
정신간호학회지
2017 .01
-
부인 정신장애에 대한 연구 - 발병원인 및 증상중심으로
동의신경정신과학회지
2004 .01
-
정신질환의 업무상 재해 인정 현황 및 평가- 한국과 일본의 사례를 중심으로 -
법과정책
2015 .01
-
지역사회정신건강 서비스 이용 경험에 관한 연구: 정신장애인 당사자와 가족의 인식 비교를 중심으로
보건과 복지
2020 .09
-
정신보건의 역사적 변화선상에서 본 우리나라 정신보건법의 문제와 개선안
의료법학
2006 .01
-
정신질환 범죄와 경찰의 대응에 관한 연구
외법논집
2019 .01
-
DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTIC MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS
한국정신건강사회복지학회 학술발표논문집
2013 .11
-
정신장애 범죄자의 특성에 따른 경찰의 대책방안에 관한 연구
한국공안행정학회보
2019 .01
-
정신건강 측면에서 본 산업안전보건 현황과 법적 과제
노동법연구
2019 .09
-
대학생의 알코올 사용장애, 가족응집력, 자아존중감이 정신건강에 미치는 영향
한국학교보건학회지
2011 .01
-
한국인의 정신건강 개념에 관한 연구
한국사회복지학
2004 .02
-
산업재해 인정기준의 현대적 과제 : 산재보험법상 업무범위와 심리적 부하의 기준을 중심으로
노동법학
2010 .03
-
정신장애범죄자에 대한 치료처분제도의 개선방안: 미국의 치료법원의 도입을 중심으로
형사법연구
2010 .01
-
지역사회 거주 정신질환자의 자기효능감, 건강태도, 건강생활습관이 회복에 미치는 영향
정신간호학회지
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-018837354