메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국체육과학회 한국체육과학회지 한국체육과학회지 제18권 제4호 (자연과학편)
발행연도
2009.11
수록면
1,303 - 1,314 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to investigate the difference of League which the frequency of pass that between offence area and defense area. For example forward, cross, back, short, long of pass. To determine whether we have played a VHS tapes each frame for N-league and K-league of Championship. Firstly the international Matches 110x75,which divide the ground by 16 and than bisect 8 of offence area. Secondly divide the direction of the pass by forward pass 150 , back pass 150 , left and right crossing each 30 and the distance of the pass by short pass (15m),middle pass (16m-30m) long pass (31m~) In the effect is recorded to the program of Microsoft office power point 2007. The results are shown in a table. The first record is by area groups that put a mark. The second is about marks and by area groups record the frequency of the pass, The third it find the total of result for N-league and K-league.
The results were as follows;
1. Both of N-league, K-league are indicative highly for forward cross, Back in defense area. The other hands between crossing and back pass was quit same while success and failure of forward pass was significantly high all of them. N-league and K-league each types as distance was shown low failure rate to offence area and defense area. As failure frequency of long pass was significantly high at all.
2. The type of pass that compare to N-league and K-league. K-league was high in forward pass and N-league was recorded high success.
3. The type of distance that compare to N- league and K-league that all the type of distance recorded almost same in each leagues but N-league of middle pass was significantly high succession.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과 및 논의
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (33)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-692-001575090