지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article is to describe the conflicts and split caused by the matter of registration on the hyangan(local leaders' list) with a focus on the disputes between political factions.
In Samga, hyangan had been made several times until 1716, and in the process not a few conflicts had happened. In 1716, conflicts became so severe that hyangan was divided into two, being recorded by two different groups. That was why the final 'Samga hyangan' was completed in two volumes by the next generations.
When the hyangan system was split into two groups, people who left(the part of B) outnumbered remaining people(the part of A). While suffering strifes, however, the B part gradually decreased in number whereas people increasingly joined the part of A. Looking into what family clans attended each part, at the A's side there were Samgoe faction(三槐堂派) of the Andong Gwon(安東權) family with some other families and at the B's part there were Jukgye faction(竹溪公派) of the Gimhae Kim(金海金) family and others. People from Saseong faction(司成公派) of the Chogye Jung(草溪鄭) family and some other families signed up their names on both sides, which shows us that even within the same family the family members made different choice about which hyangan line they would join.
After Injo's Coup, with their power weaker, local aristocratic families in West Gyeongnam Province, who succeeded to the school of Nammyeong(南冥), mostly went to the group of Southerners(南人) and some to Westerners(西人) or Norons(老論). Likewise, in Samga, there was an early appearance of family members who decided their attitude as being Westerners and then the number of families having a Noron position was on the increase. Many other families made their position clear as being Southerners. Some families were divided into Norons' line and Southerners' line within the same family as the Eunjin Song(恩津宋) family did. With Southerners exceeding in number, a considerable number of families in Samga still didn't clearly show their political position toward the party factions.
Such a situation of factional separation was reflected on hyangan: 'Samga hyanan' volume 1 was made by people from the Norons' line involving Samgoe faction of the Andong Gwon family and volume 2 was made by the Southerners involving Jukgye faction of the Gimhae Kim family. People of some families which did not belong to any political factions seemed to be introduced later into each group respectively in competition between factions.
Norons had been dominating in politics since 18th century and in that situation Norons in Samga might have tried to extend its influence, and thus the number of those who joined the Norons' line must have increased. This is confirmed by the fact that the listed members on hyangan from Norons' line gradually increased in number while the Southerners decreased.
In Samga, hyangan had been made several times until 1716, and in the process not a few conflicts had happened. In 1716, conflicts became so severe that hyangan was divided into two, being recorded by two different groups. That was why the final 'Samga hyangan' was completed in two volumes by the next generations.
When the hyangan system was split into two groups, people who left(the part of B) outnumbered remaining people(the part of A). While suffering strifes, however, the B part gradually decreased in number whereas people increasingly joined the part of A. Looking into what family clans attended each part, at the A's side there were Samgoe faction(三槐堂派) of the Andong Gwon(安東權) family with some other families and at the B's part there were Jukgye faction(竹溪公派) of the Gimhae Kim(金海金) family and others. People from Saseong faction(司成公派) of the Chogye Jung(草溪鄭) family and some other families signed up their names on both sides, which shows us that even within the same family the family members made different choice about which hyangan line they would join.
After Injo's Coup, with their power weaker, local aristocratic families in West Gyeongnam Province, who succeeded to the school of Nammyeong(南冥), mostly went to the group of Southerners(南人) and some to Westerners(西人) or Norons(老論). Likewise, in Samga, there was an early appearance of family members who decided their attitude as being Westerners and then the number of families having a Noron position was on the increase. Many other families made their position clear as being Southerners. Some families were divided into Norons' line and Southerners' line within the same family as the Eunjin Song(恩津宋) family did. With Southerners exceeding in number, a considerable number of families in Samga still didn't clearly show their political position toward the party factions.
Such a situation of factional separation was reflected on hyangan: 'Samga hyanan' volume 1 was made by people from the Norons' line involving Samgoe faction of the Andong Gwon family and volume 2 was made by the Southerners involving Jukgye faction of the Gimhae Kim family. People of some families which did not belong to any political factions seemed to be introduced later into each group respectively in competition between factions.
Norons had been dominating in politics since 18th century and in that situation Norons in Samga might have tried to extend its influence, and thus the number of those who joined the Norons' line must have increased. This is confirmed by the fact that the listed members on hyangan from Norons' line gradually increased in number while the Southerners decreased.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 자료의 내용과 성격
Ⅲ. 삼가향안에 입록된 사족 가문
Ⅳ. 사족가문의 당파적 입장과 향안에의 반영
Ⅴ. 맺음말
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (31)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 金仁杰 / 1981 / 朝鮮後期 鄕權의 推移와 支配層의 動向 / 韓國文化 2
2. [단행본] - 金仁杰 / 1983 / 朝鮮後期 鄕案의 性格變化와 在地士族 in: 金哲埈博士華甲紀念 史學論叢 / 知識産業社
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김준형 / 2005 / 鄕案入錄을 둘러싼 경남 서부지역 사족층의 갈등― 晉州鄕案을 중심으로 ― / 조선시대사학보 (33) : 147 ~ 200
4. [단행본] - 崔虎 / 1991 / 朝鮮後期 密陽의 士族과 鄕約 in: 朝鮮後期 鄕約硏究 / 民音社
5. [학위논문] - 崔虎 / 1992 / 朝鮮時代 嶺南士族의 鄕村支配 硏究－16, 17세기를 중심으로 / 박사 / 중앙대
2. [단행본] - 金仁杰 / 1983 / 朝鮮後期 鄕案의 性格變化와 在地士族 in: 金哲埈博士華甲紀念 史學論叢 / 知識産業社
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김준형 / 2005 / 鄕案入錄을 둘러싼 경남 서부지역 사족층의 갈등― 晉州鄕案을 중심으로 ― / 조선시대사학보 (33) : 147 ~ 200
4. [단행본] - 崔虎 / 1991 / 朝鮮後期 密陽의 士族과 鄕約 in: 朝鮮後期 鄕約硏究 / 民音社
5. [학위논문] - 崔虎 / 1992 / 朝鮮時代 嶺南士族의 鄕村支配 硏究－16, 17세기를 중심으로 / 박사 / 중앙대
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
의령향안의 입록과 이와 관련된 갈등양상
南冥學硏究
2005 .01
-
조선 후기 교동의 鄕案 입록 전통과 향권 주도 성씨의 추이
역사민속학
2011 .11
-
17세기 서인=노론의 상업관과 상업정책론
역사와현실
1999 .09
-
朝鮮後期 大邱地域 西人勢力의 動向
대구사학
2004 .01
-
스사노오 신화와 神代記의 논리
일어일문학
2018 .11
-
조선후기 창녕지역의 향안 중수와 재지사족
한국민족문화
2011 .07
-
鄕歌의 本質
모산학보
1997 .05
-
호남지역 서원의 지역적 특성과 정치적 성격 : 나주 경현서원을 중심으로
국학연구
2007 .12
-
[논문] 임진왜란 전후 밀양 재지사족의 동향
역사와현실
2005 .03
-
조선 후기 杞溪 兪門의 정치활동과 학풍
역사와 담론
2006 .04
-
17~18세기 영남지역 노론의 동향 : 송시열 문인가문을 중심으로
역사와실학
2002 .01
-
鄕歌의 장르設定을 위한 一考
어문론집
1981 .06
-
鄕歌 포기에 쓰인 釋讀字
한국학논집
1976 .03
-
조선시대 향약(鄕約) 및 향안조직(鄕案組織)에서의 의사결정구조
한국학논집
2005 .12
-
高麗初期 鄕史職의 由來에 對한 小考 : 鄕史職名의 變化를 中心으로
역사와 세계
1980 .01
-
鄕歌와 儀禮
모산학보
1997 .05
-
18세기 老論 一黨專制의 成立過程 : 辛壬士禍와 闡義昭鑑의 論理를 중심으로
역사학보
1986 .06
-
朝鮮前期 鄕規와 鄕規約考
사학연구
1984 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002060209