개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
I look new horizon beyond colonial modernity and national modernity. I reject the "binary constructions" of nationalist historical narratives that have produced such dichotomous interpretations of the period as "imperialist repression versus nationalist resistance" or "colonial development versus national development". Instead I propose a new paradigm and methodology which transfer from the paradigm of identity to that of difference, from single modernity to varieties of modernity.
'The modern as the real', 'the represented modern', 'the modern as the desire', 'the interpreted modern' is not the same. However, all the scholars who had researched into the modernity in Korea regarded them as the same. I solved the problem through the thought of difference and theory of varieties of modernity, and methodology of cultural studies.
The Chos?n dynasty approached to the stage of germinal capitalist society in the 18-19th centuries. Its developments were due to both western influences and voluntary engagement. Not only elite group but also peoples contributed to capitalist development. The relation of commodity-money economy appeared between the socio-economic base and the people in the age. There were four types of man's attitudes in this economic system: a irrational moralist, a rational moneymaker, a irrational moneymaker, a rational moralist. While, a rational moneymaker seems to be gradually won in the hegemonic struggle against a irrational moralist, the capitalist development ensured its legitimacy.
There was a clear transition in Chos?n Dynasty in the era of 18-19 centuries. Those transition are a variety of modernity that is different from the western modernization. Now, we can research the modernity in Chos?n Dynasty more exactly through the thought of difference and theory of varieties of modernity, and methodology of cultural studies.
'The modern as the real', 'the represented modern', 'the modern as the desire', 'the interpreted modern' is not the same. However, all the scholars who had researched into the modernity in Korea regarded them as the same. I solved the problem through the thought of difference and theory of varieties of modernity, and methodology of cultural studies.
The Chos?n dynasty approached to the stage of germinal capitalist society in the 18-19th centuries. Its developments were due to both western influences and voluntary engagement. Not only elite group but also peoples contributed to capitalist development. The relation of commodity-money economy appeared between the socio-economic base and the people in the age. There were four types of man's attitudes in this economic system: a irrational moralist, a rational moneymaker, a irrational moneymaker, a rational moralist. While, a rational moneymaker seems to be gradually won in the hegemonic struggle against a irrational moralist, the capitalist development ensured its legitimacy.
There was a clear transition in Chos?n Dynasty in the era of 18-19 centuries. Those transition are a variety of modernity that is different from the western modernization. Now, we can research the modernity in Chos?n Dynasty more exactly through the thought of difference and theory of varieties of modernity, and methodology of cultural studies.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 오리엔탈리즘과 민족주의 담론을 넘어 차이와 혼성성으로
3. 역사-실증주의를 넘어 총체적 문화론으로
4. 단일한 근대화론과 정태적 분석에서 多種의 근대성론과 역동적 해석으로
5. 차이와 이종의 근대성이 지향하는 지표
5. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
김규동 초기시의 특성과 그 의미
비평문학
2018 .06
-
한국 근대성의 정당성 위기
동양철학연구
2009 .01
-
[특집/한국근대문학연구 비판] 한국근대문학사론과 근대성의 담론들 - 1930년대 후반 비평사 연구를 중심으로
한국근대문학연구
2001 .04
-
근대성 비판으로서의 "형식" : 김남천의 경우
현대소설연구
2001 .12
-
일제강점기 현대시 관련 근대성 담론의 층위와 특성
어문학
2011 .03
-
한국의 근대성 연구와 "근대주의"
사회와 철학
2016 .04
-
조향 시문학의 근대성과 탈근대성
우리문학연구
2017 .10
-
윤동주 시의 탈근대성 연구
한국시학연구
2008 .12
-
한국미술의 미적 근대성
역사학보
2009 .09
-
Thinking Modernity Historically: Is "Alternative Modernity" the Answer?
The Asian review of world histories
2013 .01
-
마음의 자신과의 대화 : 매슈 아널드의 모더니티 인식
외국문학연구
2004 .08
-
Colonial Modernity and the Making of Modern Korean Cities
Korea Journal
2008 .09
-
일제강점기 한국인의 식민지 체험과 새로운 근대 기획
역사비평
2010 .02
-
Two Korea's Perceptions of the "Colonial Modernity" since 1945
International Journal of Korean History
2001 .12
-
근대성에 관한 역사철학적 탐구 : 서설
철학논총
1999 .12
-
모더니티의 ‘이면’으로서 라틴 아메리카
외국문학연구
2003 .11
-
새로운 문명학의 형식
이탈리아어문학
2011 .01
-
중국의 현대성 문제와 동아시아 : 보편을 넘는 ‘보편공동체’의 재구성을 위하여
아시아문화연구
2008 .05
-
트랜스모더니티와 문화의 생태학 : 식민적 차이와 유럽중심주의적 근대성 비판
코기토
2011 .08
-
Raising the Issue of ‘Modernity’ : ‘Colonial modernity’ theory as advanced by Japanese Korean Studies scholars and the background thereof
International Journal of Korean History
2012 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
식민지 근대화론을 발본적으로 비판한 생산적 논쟁의 전범 : 허수열, 『일제초기 조선의 농업』(한길사, 2011)
정연태
역사와현실
2012
.03
식민지 근대화론에 대한 이해와 오해
전상인
동아시아비평
1998
.10
식민지 근대화론에 매몰된 식민지 시기 서술
박찬승
역사비평
2008
.05
식민지 근대화론 연구성과의 비판적 수용을 위한 제언
조석곤
역사비평
2006
.05
'식민지근대화론'의 역사인식 해부 -『한국의 식민지적 근대 성찰-근대주의 비판과 평화공존의 역사학 모색』-정태헌, 선인, 2007
홍성찬
역사비평
2007
.08
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-810-001870243