지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The historial novels of Kwang-Soo Lee were subject of much discussion, as they were subject of studies on Korean modern historical novels. The historical discussions about Lee’s historical novels show us what kind of subjects have been more paid attention. Looking the history of discussions about lee’s historical novels could show the tendency of study on the korean modern historical novels.
In late 1960∼1980, critics defined the modern historical novels as ‘the history of the preceding age’. They insisted that the author’s historical consciousness be the most essential condition as the historical novels. On one hand, critics who accepted Lukacs’s theory, argued that Lee’s works couldn’t reach the standards as modern historical novels because of the lack of the historical consciousness. On the other hand, critics appreciated the enlightening value of lee’s works.
These two conflicting opinions have a common point that the literature is a mirror of the society and the author’s consciousness is important. This idea nevertheless ignores the following two important points. First, the deductive definition of ‘modern historical novels’, following the occidental models, misses the characterisitcs of ‘korean historical novel’. Second, the overemphasizing of the author’s consciousness ignores the artistic form of novels.
The tendency which emphasizes the historical consciousness and the connection between the novel and the society is the countermeasure to the politically chaotic state. The critics tried to find the way to overcome this kind of politically unstable situation with literature and this attitude was reflected on the study on the historical novels.
In late 1960∼1980, critics defined the modern historical novels as ‘the history of the preceding age’. They insisted that the author’s historical consciousness be the most essential condition as the historical novels. On one hand, critics who accepted Lukacs’s theory, argued that Lee’s works couldn’t reach the standards as modern historical novels because of the lack of the historical consciousness. On the other hand, critics appreciated the enlightening value of lee’s works.
These two conflicting opinions have a common point that the literature is a mirror of the society and the author’s consciousness is important. This idea nevertheless ignores the following two important points. First, the deductive definition of ‘modern historical novels’, following the occidental models, misses the characterisitcs of ‘korean historical novel’. Second, the overemphasizing of the author’s consciousness ignores the artistic form of novels.
The tendency which emphasizes the historical consciousness and the connection between the novel and the society is the countermeasure to the politically chaotic state. The critics tried to find the way to overcome this kind of politically unstable situation with literature and this attitude was reflected on the study on the historical novels.
목차
1. 서론
2. 역사소설과 현실 반영의 문제
3. 한국의 역사소설 연구 경향과 사회 참여적 문학관
4. 결론을 대신하여
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (4)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국현대역사소설론
한국근대문학연구
2004 .10
-
역사교육 개념어의 용례 검토 : 역사적 사고, 역사해석, 역사인식, 역사의식
역사교육
2010 .03
-
일제강점기 역사소설의 세 양상
우리말글
2012 .12
-
학생들의 역사 개념에 대한 이해 양상과 역사의식
역사교육
2009 .09
-
학생의 다양성과 역사교육 : 학생의 역사 정체성 및 역사의식, ‘다원적 역사’에 대한 해외 연구 검토
역사교육
2018 .12
-
국외 역사교육의 ‘역사의식’ 연구동향과 그 시사점
역사교육
2012 .09
-
한국교회의 역사의식
한국기독교와 역사
1992 .11
-
이광수 역사소설 속의 신라정신-원효대사를 중심으로
동악어문학
2001 .12
-
비판적 사고를 위한 역사인식과 학습방법
역사와 담론
2016 .10
-
역사적 사실의 특징과 역사교육의 특수성
역사교육
2010 .03
-
이광수 소설 『흙』의 영화화 양상 고찰
춘원연구학보
2018 .12
-
역사소설이란 무엇인가? : 근대문학 속의 역사소설
문화과학
2010 .09
-
역사 속의 비극적 개인과 계몽 의식 - 춘원 이광수의 1920년대 역사소설 논고 -
우리말글
2003 .08
-
歷史小說, 歷史드라마에 나타난 古代史像 고찰 : 최인호, 이문열 소설을 중심으로
스토리앤이미지텔링
2013 .06
-
역사소설의 검증을 서둘러야 한다
현대소설연구
1994 .12
-
집단기억, 역사의식, 역사교육
역사교육
2009 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-809-003395175