지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Korean king used the signing of the 1876 Treaty of Amity between Chosen and Japan to begin adopting the western system of international law. The conclusion of treaties of amity and commerce with the U.S., England, and Germany in 1882 showed a strong desire to enter into this new system, so much so that concluding treaties with the Western powers presented few worries for Korea. Because the Chosun government actively pursued the necessary preparations for signing these treaties, the benefits of tariff autonomy were, in fact, achieved through these diplomatic arrangements. These circumstances differ from those of Meiji Japan, which was forced to endure unequal tariff regulations in the wake of the sudden shock of the 'black ships" and a divided public opinion. The task faced by Chosun Korea was not in its relations with the West but in re-arranging its traditional relations with China.
By the time of the conclusion of the Treaty of Amity and Commerce with the U.S., the Chosun monarch and his court had already been its search for a strategy to solve this problem. They quickly sent an official to negotiate with the Chinese to put an end to the long-standing system in which an envoy shuttled back and forth between Chosun and China, and wisely suggested to carry out a plan to establish a system of permanent diplomatic residence. However, Ching China showed no willingness to modify its traditional relations with Chosun, in spite of the fact that it went as far as to suggest that Chosun establish friendly relations with the U.S. Hence, China naturally displayed a negative attitude towards the proposal presented by the Koreans. In fact, the Chinese court considered this proposal as a Korean attempt to break away from its sphere of influence, and produced the opposite effect of strengthening China's suzerain relations with Chosun, "This policy was most detrimental to Korea's modernization, and hence the struggle by the Chosun government against it was more demanding than Japan's efforts to revise its unequal treaties with the Western powers. In order to overcome the stronger than expected resistance on the part of the Chinese, the Chosun government attempted a number of negotiations with the Russians. Nevertheless, all of the secret contacts with Russia ended in failure, and at each failed attempt, the Chinese put more pressure on Chosun. Although the decade of the 1880s was the most important for Korea to carry out its modernization projects, it was forced to waste that valuable time, burdened by China's strong opposition to its attempts at participating in the new international system.
By the time of the conclusion of the Treaty of Amity and Commerce with the U.S., the Chosun monarch and his court had already been its search for a strategy to solve this problem. They quickly sent an official to negotiate with the Chinese to put an end to the long-standing system in which an envoy shuttled back and forth between Chosun and China, and wisely suggested to carry out a plan to establish a system of permanent diplomatic residence. However, Ching China showed no willingness to modify its traditional relations with Chosun, in spite of the fact that it went as far as to suggest that Chosun establish friendly relations with the U.S. Hence, China naturally displayed a negative attitude towards the proposal presented by the Koreans. In fact, the Chinese court considered this proposal as a Korean attempt to break away from its sphere of influence, and produced the opposite effect of strengthening China's suzerain relations with Chosun, "This policy was most detrimental to Korea's modernization, and hence the struggle by the Chosun government against it was more demanding than Japan's efforts to revise its unequal treaties with the Western powers. In order to overcome the stronger than expected resistance on the part of the Chinese, the Chosun government attempted a number of negotiations with the Russians. Nevertheless, all of the secret contacts with Russia ended in failure, and at each failed attempt, the Chinese put more pressure on Chosun. Although the decade of the 1880s was the most important for Korea to carry out its modernization projects, it was forced to waste that valuable time, burdened by China's strong opposition to its attempts at participating in the new international system.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 일본ㆍ미국과의 조약 체결과 중국과의 전통적 관계 청산 시도
Ⅲ. 淸의 반발과 속방화 정책의 강행
Ⅳ. 러시아와의 교섭을 통한 극복 모색
Ⅴ. 결론
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
1764年度(英祖 40) 朝鮮通信使の日本使行に對して
아시아문화연구
2000 .02
-
1920년 전후 조선 상업회의소와 조선 산업정책의 확립
역사와경계
2006 .03
-
서양인의 조선여행 기록문을 통한 근대 식생활사(食生活史) 연구
한국식생활문화학회지
2016 .01
-
19世紀後半における朝鮮をめぐる国際情勢 －｢属国｣と｢自主｣の問題をめぐって－
日本學硏究
2011 .01
-
帝国日本の文化権力: 1910年代京城の能と謡
일본연구
2014 .08
-
개항기 일본 역사교과서 서술의 검토
한일관계사연구
2008 .08
-
김교신의 조선산 기독교에 대한 역사적 이해 : 조선혼과 조선심을 중심으로
한국기독교와 역사
2017 .09
-
華夷觀과 조선조 사대부의 對外認識
중어중문학
2012 .04
-
조일수호조규 관철을 위한 일본의 정찰활동과 조선의 대응
역사학보
2013 .03
-
식민지 공업화 문제의 연구사
인문학논총
2001 .08
-
근대중국의 불평등조약 중 선교조항의 선교적 이중성
신학과 목회
2015 .05
-
日帝 强占期 朝鮮 民俗調査 事業에 관한 硏究 : 아키바 다카시의 調査와 硏究를 中心으로 한 考察
동아인문학
2010 .06
-
태평양전쟁기 조선총독부의 국책조선소 건설추진과 그 귀결 : 朝鮮造船工業株式會社의 사례
한국사연구
2008 .12
-
일제하 동북아 관세문제와 조선의 대‘중국’ 무역
한국사연구
2013 .03
-
도한 일본인의 일상과 식민지 ‘조선’의 생성 : 잡지 『조선(朝鮮)』 문예란을 중심으로
아시아문화연구
2010 .09
-
1910년대 '朝鮮貴族'의 實態―『每日申報』 기사를 중심으로―
사학연구
2004 .12
-
‘장정체제’에 대한 조선 정부의 저항과 만국공법 : 1883~1884년 무역장정의 발효 시점을 중심으로
역사학보
2015 .06
-
고조선의 도읍 위치와 그 이동
고조선단군학
2002 .12
-
朝英條約(1883. 11)과 불평등조약체제의 재정립
한국사연구
2006 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002854443