지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
A legal policy of arbitration should aim to regulate the application of international standards which are developing in an increasingly complex fashion. As the administering of arbitration cases is characterized by the gradual recognition of general standards in relation to international commercial arbitration procedure.
International commercial arbitration has progressively become an autonomous discipline at the heart of the law and practices of international trade. The ICC International Court of Arbitration contributes usefully to the security and expansion of world trade.
The principle of party autonomy enables the parties to an arbitration to design their arbitral proceedings to suit their particular needs. With regard to the law governing arbitral procedure, this principle grants the parties the power to select suitable procedural rules.
Parties to a commercial agreement do not always exercise their right to expressly determine their own choice of law. This factor led to the development of the theory of implied choice of law whereby certain actions of the parties are deemed to manifest an intention to have their agreement regulated by a particular national law. According to this theory, the parties' intention regarding their choice of law could, in some instances, be reasonably inferred from their contractual document.
International commercial arbitration involve the levels of Law: the law applicable to the arbitration agreement, which regulates the obligation of the parties to settle the dispute by arbitration. The law applicable to the reference, which governs the individual reference to arbitration. The law applicable to the arbitration proceedings, which regulates the conduct of the arbitration proceedings. The law applicable to the substance of the dispute, which determines the rights and obligation of the parties in relation to their substantive contract.
General principles of conflicts of laws is based on the presumption that certain principles of conflict of laws are common to the world community, or at any rate to a majority of them. It is thus premised on the possibility of common principles from national conflict rules.
There is no doubt that if there are indeed such principles that are generally accepted, they should be applied by arbitrators not only because their application would be deemed to be within the expectations of the parties, but also because their general acceptance argues the case for their application in international commercial arbitration.
International commercial arbitration has progressively become an autonomous discipline at the heart of the law and practices of international trade. The ICC International Court of Arbitration contributes usefully to the security and expansion of world trade.
The principle of party autonomy enables the parties to an arbitration to design their arbitral proceedings to suit their particular needs. With regard to the law governing arbitral procedure, this principle grants the parties the power to select suitable procedural rules.
Parties to a commercial agreement do not always exercise their right to expressly determine their own choice of law. This factor led to the development of the theory of implied choice of law whereby certain actions of the parties are deemed to manifest an intention to have their agreement regulated by a particular national law. According to this theory, the parties' intention regarding their choice of law could, in some instances, be reasonably inferred from their contractual document.
International commercial arbitration involve the levels of Law: the law applicable to the arbitration agreement, which regulates the obligation of the parties to settle the dispute by arbitration. The law applicable to the reference, which governs the individual reference to arbitration. The law applicable to the arbitration proceedings, which regulates the conduct of the arbitration proceedings. The law applicable to the substance of the dispute, which determines the rights and obligation of the parties in relation to their substantive contract.
General principles of conflicts of laws is based on the presumption that certain principles of conflict of laws are common to the world community, or at any rate to a majority of them. It is thus premised on the possibility of common principles from national conflict rules.
There is no doubt that if there are indeed such principles that are generally accepted, they should be applied by arbitrators not only because their application would be deemed to be within the expectations of the parties, but also because their general acceptance argues the case for their application in international commercial arbitration.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 국제상사중재의 대별
Ⅲ. 국제상사중재의 법적 요건
Ⅳ. 국제상사중재의 중재계약의 법적성질
Ⅴ. 국제상사중재의 준거법
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (16)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
상사중재에 있어서 당사자자치의 역할
중재연구
2009 .01
-
국제상사중재제도에 있어서 중재판정에 관한 비교법적 고찰
무역학회지
2003 .06
-
국제중재에 있어서 중재합의의 준거법 결정
무역학자 전국대회 발표논문집
2005 .08
-
중재계약의 준거법 적용에 관한 연구
문화산업연구
2004 .06
-
국제상사중재에 있어서 중재지의 의미
중재연구
2008 .01
-
國際去來에 있어서 仲裁合意의 準據法 決定에 관한 考察
원광법학
2009 .01
-
중재에 있어서 법원의 역할
무역상무연구
2006 .05
-
CISG and Arbitration Agreements: A Janus-Faced Practice and How to Cope with It
중재연구
2015 .01
-
국제중재에 있어서 중재합의의 준거법 결정에 관한 연구
중재연구
2005 .01
-
남북상사중재의 실효성확보를 위한 제도운영의 활성화방안에 관한 연구
한국무역학회 세미나 및 토론회
2004 .08
-
중재합의시 중재지 결정에 관한 연구
통상정보연구
2010 .12
-
A Study on the Amended Arbitration Law of Mongolia
중재연구
2017 .01
-
국제상사중재합의의 요건과 내용에 관한 연구
무역학회지
2007 .08
-
남북상사중재위원회의 법적 성격 및 효율적 운영방안에 관한 연구
기업법연구
2005 .12
-
중국에서의 국제상사중재합의 유효성에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2011 .05
-
몽골 중재제도의 주요특징과 유의사항에 관한 연구
중재연구
2013 .01
-
중재에 있어서 실체적 준거법에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2013 .05
-
중국 중재계약의 형식과 내용에 관한 비교법적 고찰
비교법학연구
2003 .09
-
중재계약의 법적 효력에 관한 연구
중재연구
2009 .01
-
중국의 하자중재합의 효력 인정에 관한 연구
관세학회지
2013 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-326-002882833