지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As Korea ranks first in terms of the number of ship-building orders, beating Japan, the checks of Japan and the European countries which have traditionally been leaders in the ship building industry are increasing. The EU has constantly used its trading power against Korea's shipbuilding industry, and finally it has led to the current stage of the trade dispute in which both parties, the EU and Korea, might involve the WTO in finding a solution. The likely scenario is that the EU would bring a case before the WTO, whereas Korea would keep negotiating. Therefore, Korea may need not only to find an agreeable solution, but also to consider a counter-suit at the WTO in connection with the payment of subsidies, in cooperation with the leading shipping lines.
First of all, in the case that Korea keeps negotiating by presenting the solution of yielding to the conditions, Korea must point out the unjustified demands of the EU and must make an effort to settle the dispute.
Second, Korea must cooperate with the shipping lines who are complaining about the rise in shipping charges caused by the EU's one-sided decision, and it must take the lead by putting pressure upon the EU directly and indirectly.
Third, if the excessive demands of the EU continue, Korea may need to seriously consider a counter-suit at the WTO concerning subsidies from the EU to European shipbuilding yards, in the middle to long term. In addition, Korea should take a decisive step to solve the wrong habitual practices and other problems that the Korean shipbuilding industry has. Korea should do its best to reform its shipbuilding industry to make it competitive and increase the quality. To do this, first, excessively low prices and high competition between domestic factories should be avoided. Second, the shipbuilding industry should maintain sound financial status by reducing the rate of debt. Finally, unnecessary checks from competitors in other countries should be removed in advance through restraining the extension of facilities.
First of all, in the case that Korea keeps negotiating by presenting the solution of yielding to the conditions, Korea must point out the unjustified demands of the EU and must make an effort to settle the dispute.
Second, Korea must cooperate with the shipping lines who are complaining about the rise in shipping charges caused by the EU's one-sided decision, and it must take the lead by putting pressure upon the EU directly and indirectly.
Third, if the excessive demands of the EU continue, Korea may need to seriously consider a counter-suit at the WTO concerning subsidies from the EU to European shipbuilding yards, in the middle to long term. In addition, Korea should take a decisive step to solve the wrong habitual practices and other problems that the Korean shipbuilding industry has. Korea should do its best to reform its shipbuilding industry to make it competitive and increase the quality. To do this, first, excessively low prices and high competition between domestic factories should be avoided. Second, the shipbuilding industry should maintain sound financial status by reducing the rate of debt. Finally, unnecessary checks from competitors in other countries should be removed in advance through restraining the extension of facilities.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 한국과 EU의 조선산업 현황
Ⅲ. 한국과 EU의 조선산업 통상마찰
Ⅳ. 한국과 EU간의 조선산업 협상
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국 · EU의 조선산업 통상마찰의 시장요인과 대응방안
유럽연구
2002 .12
-
한ㆍEU 조선통상분쟁 사례연구 : EU의 WTO 제소를 중심으로
무역학회지
2003 .04
-
한ㆍEU 조선산업 보조금분쟁에 관한 연구
무역학회지
2003 .09
-
WTO체제하에서 한ㆍEU간 조선산업 통상분쟁과 대응방안 : 동북아 조선산업협력을 중심으로
한국무역학회 학술대회
2003 .05
-
국제금융위기가 한국 조선 산업의 대 EU 교역에 미치는 효과
유럽연구
2012 .08
-
EU
[KIEP] 월간 KIEP 세계경제
2003 .11
-
EU-15
[KIEP] 월간 KIEP 세계경제
2004 .12
-
EU
[KIEP] 월간 KIEP 세계경제
2002 .12
-
EU
[KIEP] 월간 KIEP 세계경제
2003 .11
-
EU
[KIEP] 월간 KIEP 세계경제
1999 .12
-
EU
[KIEP] 월간 KIEP 세계경제
1998 .12
-
한-EU 자동차 통상마찰과 대응전략
유럽연구
1996 .12
-
EU의 대중국 경제관계와 통상전략의 변화
영상저널
2007 .12
-
한국 대학생의 EU 학습과 EU 공헌도 인식에 대한 실증연구
유럽연구
2017 .03
-
EU-Korea at 50: Main Issues, Perceptions and Prospects
EU연구
2013 .01
-
EU의 차별적 · 보호주의적 대외통상정책
유럽연구
2009 .04
-
대내·외 경제여건 변화에 따른 EU 통상정책의 변화
EU연구
2013 .01
-
'Trading Giant' and 'Economic Powerhouse'? : Images of the EU in Korean Television News
유럽연구
2010 .12
-
한·EU FTA 이후 대EU 통상정책의 방향과 전략
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2011 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-326-002902025