지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2005.6
- 수록면
- 233 - 255 (23page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Critics in the neoclassical period criticized Shakespeare's use of degenerating expressions, vulgar words, bombasts and his excessive use of puns. Furthermore, they criticized Shakespeare's violation of the three unities and his lack of moral instruction or poetic justice. Their views of Shakespeare were limited by the neoclassical principles. Samuel Taylor Coleridge, the representative critic of Shakespeare in the romantic period, defended Shakespeare's disregard of the three unities, pointing out that it is a "willing suspension of disbelief for the moment, which constitutes poetic faith." He also defended Shakespeare's use of puns and quibbles, and his defence was based on his belief that playing with language is "a natural trait, in certain circumstances, which, in certain places, Shakespeare judiciously imitates."
Coleridge's contribution to the understanding of Shakespeare lies in his theory of imagination and organic unity. In the Biographia Literaria Coleridge wrote: "a living body is of necessity an organized one,-and what is organization, but connection of parts to a whole, so that each part is at once end and means! …No work of true genius dare want its appropriate forms,… As it must not, so neither can it, be lawless! For it is even this that constitutes it genius-the power of acting creatively under laws of its own origination." This is Coleridge's praise of Shakespeare's genius and judgement to keep organic unity in his works. Coleridge considered Shakespeare's imagination as "the power by which one images or feeling is made to modify many others, and by a sort of fusion to force many into one." Coleridge believed in the power of imagination and a creative power which can combine many things into "one moment of thought to produce the ultimate end of human thought and human feeling, unity."
Ben Jonson praised Shakespeare saying that "he was not of an age, but for all time." For Samuel Johnson, Shakespeare was the poet of nature who represented "a faithful mirror of manners and of life." John Dryden praised Shakespeare as a poet who had "the largest and most comprehensive soul." For Coleridge, Shakespeare was the "myriad-minded" genius who had "the inward eye of meditation." Likewise, Coleridge himself can be remembered as a critic who had "the most comprehensive soul" and "the inward eye" in the field of Shakespearean criticism.
Coleridge's contribution to the understanding of Shakespeare lies in his theory of imagination and organic unity. In the Biographia Literaria Coleridge wrote: "a living body is of necessity an organized one,-and what is organization, but connection of parts to a whole, so that each part is at once end and means! …No work of true genius dare want its appropriate forms,… As it must not, so neither can it, be lawless! For it is even this that constitutes it genius-the power of acting creatively under laws of its own origination." This is Coleridge's praise of Shakespeare's genius and judgement to keep organic unity in his works. Coleridge considered Shakespeare's imagination as "the power by which one images or feeling is made to modify many others, and by a sort of fusion to force many into one." Coleridge believed in the power of imagination and a creative power which can combine many things into "one moment of thought to produce the ultimate end of human thought and human feeling, unity."
Ben Jonson praised Shakespeare saying that "he was not of an age, but for all time." For Samuel Johnson, Shakespeare was the poet of nature who represented "a faithful mirror of manners and of life." John Dryden praised Shakespeare as a poet who had "the largest and most comprehensive soul." For Coleridge, Shakespeare was the "myriad-minded" genius who had "the inward eye of meditation." Likewise, Coleridge himself can be remembered as a critic who had "the most comprehensive soul" and "the inward eye" in the field of Shakespearean criticism.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (18)
참고문헌 신청
[단행본] - 김정근 / 1996 / 콜리지의 문학과 사상 / 서울: 한신문화사
[단행본] - 이상섭 / 1996 / 영미비평사 2 / 서울: 민음사
[단행본] - Badawi, M. M / 1973 / Coleridge: Critic of Shakespeare / London: Cambridge UP
[단행본] - Coleridge, Samuel Taylor / 1817 / Biographia Literaria I, II / Princeton: Princeton UP
[단행본] - Bate, W. Jackson / 1814 / On the Principles of Genial Criticism (Criticism: The Major Texts) / New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich : 364 ~ 375
[단행본] - 이상섭 / 1996 / 영미비평사 2 / 서울: 민음사
[단행본] - Badawi, M. M / 1973 / Coleridge: Critic of Shakespeare / London: Cambridge UP
[단행본] - Coleridge, Samuel Taylor / 1817 / Biographia Literaria I, II / Princeton: Princeton UP
[단행본] - Bate, W. Jackson / 1814 / On the Principles of Genial Criticism (Criticism: The Major Texts) / New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich : 364 ~ 375
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
코울리지가 본 시인으로서의 셰익스피어
Shakespeare Review
2000 .06
-
사뮤엘 존슨(Samuel Johnson)의 셰익스피어 비평
Shakespeare Review
2000 .12
-
코울리지의 햄릿 이미지
Shakespeare Review
2015 .03
-
Shakespeare In Korea
Shakespeare Review
2002 .09
-
코올리지 비평의 생태학적 함의
19세기 영어권 문학
2003 .02
-
Colonial Shakespeares : Shakespeare in Korea, 1906-1945
Shakespeare Review
1997 .12
-
코울리지와 여성성
신영어영문학
2005 .02
-
셰익스피어와 1990년대 이후 미국 대중문화 : 『윌 파워!』에서 『햄릿의 블랙베리』까지 자기계발서를 중심으로
Shakespeare Review
2013 .03
-
Shakespeare연구의 성과
비평문학
1990 .09
-
한국에서의 Shakespeare 연구 조사(Ⅱ)
Shakespeare Review
1995 .06
-
Shakespeare in Japanese
Shakespeare Review
2002 .09
-
19세기 아동 문학 풍토와 램 남매의 『셰익스피어 이야기』각색 연구
Shakespeare Review
2017 .03
-
Coleridge's Ecopoetics : An Ecological Reading of Coleridge's Poems
19세기 영어권 문학
2003 .08
-
드라이든과 포프의 셰익스피어 비평
신영어영문학
2002 .08
-
Shakespeare극중 초자연적 요소의 고찰
비평문학
1991 .10
-
민족시인의 형성 : 왕정복고기와 18세기 영국의 셰익스피어
Shakespeare Review
2015 .09
-
셰익스피어 부흥과 여성 관객의 역할—“셰익스피어 레이디스 클럽”
영어영문학21
2012 .01
-
18세기 셰익스피어 : 영국 국가영웅 이미지
Shakespeare Review
2007 .03
-
Everybody's Shakespeare
Shakespeare Review
1998 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
영문학을 읽는 여섯 가지 방법
이정호
신영어영문학회 학술발표회 자료집
2002
.01
Ulysses and Tithonus As a Consistent Speaker For Alfred Tennyson in "Ulysses" and "Tithonus"
Yoon Hee-Oyck
신영어영문학
2001
.11
The lmage of the Dying Swan in "The Lady of Shalott"
김숭희
19세기 영어권 문학
1998
.04
A Midsummer Night's Dream에 대한 신화비평적ㆍ심리학적 해석
李惠京
Shakespeare Review
1993
.12
인간의 정념과 신의 복수 : 에우리피데스의 『히폴리토스』
김종환
신영어영문학
2016
.08
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-840-003078038