메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국비교노동법학회 노동법논총 勞動法論叢 第九輯
발행연도
2006.6
수록면
33 - 57 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
ILO human rights standards have assumed a new prominence in recent years in the context of possible linkages between labour standards and the liberalisation of international trade. This has provided a much-needed boost to the standing and relevance of the ILO as it struggles to redefine its role in the post-Cold War environment. Despite its modest overall record in relation to ratification of ILO conventions, Korea has ratified all but one of the seven conventions which constitute the centre-piece of the debate on labour standards and trade. It has also maintained a generally high level of compliance with its obligations under those standards, and in relation to its duty to respect the principles of freedom of association. To some extent, this compliance record may reflect the long-standing policy of successive governments of ratifying conventions only where law and practice are in full compliance, and where all jurisdictions have been prepared to agree to ratification thereby impliedly committing themselves to maintaining compliance with the instrument concerned. However, there is also some reason to suppose that the generally high level of compliance reflects a genuine commitment to the principles embodied in at least the core conventions. As noted earlier, legislative initiatives in the industrial relations area, are routinely checked for conformity with freedom of association standards. Notwithstanding its lukewarm attitude towards the ILO, the Korea government appears to have gone to some lengths to ensure that its reforms to the industrial relations system maintained compliance with Korea's existing commitments-especially in the area of freedom of association. Even if this reflected nothing more noble than a grudging recognition that the legislation might not be passed by the Senate if it exhibited a flagrant disregard for ILO standards, that in itself would tend to confirm the positive impact of ILO human rights standards on law and policy in Korea. Similarly, policy initiatives in relation to issues have been conditioned by a recognised need to ensure continued compliance with the forced labour conventions. In addition, there have also been numerous instances over the years where State and federal governments have introduced legislation to establish compliance. or to ensure continued compliance, with ratified conventions in relation to freedom of association, forced labour and equal opportunity. This seems to bear out the proposition set out in the introduction that these standards have played a markedly effective--if largely unacknowledged--role in protecting fundamental human rights in a country where the Constitution affords little protection (formal or informal) to those rights, and where human rights issues in general conspicuously fail to excite the imagination of either the public or their elected representatives.

목차

【ABSTRACT】
Ⅰ. 公益事業의 勤勞三權
Ⅱ. 美國
Ⅲ. 日本
Ⅳ. 結論

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-336-003120249