지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2004.12
- 수록면
- 1,003 - 1,025 (23page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper is in line with much-laboured postcolonial discourses of the territorial possession of the island. My reading is focused on the Prospero's antithetical servants, Ariel and Caliban, in the context of the Spanish colonial expansion in the sixteenth century, which paved the way for later English colonial practices. The British imperialism was in its earliest infancy at the time of the play's composition. My discussion is divided into three themes: the island's identity, its territorial ownership, and its history and future.
The island's identity has parallels with the concepts of the play as an early modern version of Aeneid, an allegory of the Mediterranean, and the image of the New World empires. That Shakespeare did not give any clue to contemporary historical specificity allows for a variety of interpretations of the island's identity. The island is a conceptual region, as is shown in the metaphor of Gonzalo's apple: the reader can seed the sea with apples so that other islands can grow and multiply. The apple metaphor lends itself to the possibility of various discourses in the light of early modern, as well as postcolonial, theories of international law.
The island's territorial ownership is rooted in the question of 'who first saw or discovered the island?' The principle of first possession is dispossessed by the rule of current possession and the right of conquest. Ariel's ownership right was taken away by Sycorax, and in turn Caliban's right by Prospero. This leads to the notion that Ariel has the equal and even anterior rights to the island.
The island's history has the relevance of the dichotomy between the friendly Arawak and the hostile Carib in the original Caribbean natives. This division offers a new way of reading the conflicting rights of Ariel and Caliban, and colonial construction of their antagonism as good and bad servant. The island's future is also open from the perspective of its original inhabitants. The consistent evidence of bloodshed or attack following the decolonization of the Third World since the 1960s is one of the issues that the play symbolizes to us. The play's ending mirrors the shadows cast by the course of current history, and envisions the controversial antagonism between good and bad people in former Yugoslavia and Iraq in. the present.
The island's identity has parallels with the concepts of the play as an early modern version of Aeneid, an allegory of the Mediterranean, and the image of the New World empires. That Shakespeare did not give any clue to contemporary historical specificity allows for a variety of interpretations of the island's identity. The island is a conceptual region, as is shown in the metaphor of Gonzalo's apple: the reader can seed the sea with apples so that other islands can grow and multiply. The apple metaphor lends itself to the possibility of various discourses in the light of early modern, as well as postcolonial, theories of international law.
The island's territorial ownership is rooted in the question of 'who first saw or discovered the island?' The principle of first possession is dispossessed by the rule of current possession and the right of conquest. Ariel's ownership right was taken away by Sycorax, and in turn Caliban's right by Prospero. This leads to the notion that Ariel has the equal and even anterior rights to the island.
The island's history has the relevance of the dichotomy between the friendly Arawak and the hostile Carib in the original Caribbean natives. This division offers a new way of reading the conflicting rights of Ariel and Caliban, and colonial construction of their antagonism as good and bad servant. The island's future is also open from the perspective of its original inhabitants. The consistent evidence of bloodshed or attack following the decolonization of the Third World since the 1960s is one of the issues that the play symbolizes to us. The play's ending mirrors the shadows cast by the course of current history, and envisions the controversial antagonism between good and bad people in former Yugoslavia and Iraq in. the present.
목차
섬의 정체성
섬의 영토 소유권
섬의 역사와 미래
인용문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
캘리밴과 에어리얼 : 『태풍』의 아웃사이더
Shakespeare Review
2004 .12
-
캘리번과 국외자 담론
외국문학연구
2003 .02
-
접근성에 따른 도서 지역 연구변화 분석
도서문화
2017 .12
-
The girl from An Island
Korea Journal
1967 .08
-
이청준의 보로메오 매듭
현대정신분석
1999 .12
-
On the Extractability out of Islands in the Coordinate Structure and Its Implications
언어
2019 .09
-
On the Variability of Island Effects in Korean Fragments and Its Implications
언어
2019 .03
-
Ariel Poems에 비친 삶과 죽음의 주제
새한영어영문학
1992 .09
-
지방정부 도서정책의 특징과 시사점 : 광역시 · 도의 도서 관련 조례를 중심으로
도서문화
2017 .12
-
‘섬의 인문학’ 담론 : 섬과 바다의 일체성과 양면성의 문제
도서문화
2014 .12
-
『동아일보』〈島嶼巡禮〉를 통해서 본 1920년대 도서 민속에 대한 인식
도서문화
2012 .06
-
섬의 生態地理와 持續可能性에 대한 小考
도서문화
2011 .06
-
서남해 도서자연자원의 생태적 가치와 지속가능한 활용
도서문화
2011 .12
-
Remarks on de Vries’ (2013) Derivation of the Parasitic Gap Construction
영어학
2017 .03
-
Choice Functions and Island Evasion Effects in (Non)contrastive Fragments
생성문법연구
2018 .01
-
[Story] The Girl from an Island
Korea Journal
1974 .12
-
프로스페로의 마술과 스테파노의 술: 『템페스트』에 나타난 초기 식민주의의 두 얼굴
Shakespeare Review
2019 .06
-
CHEJU ISLAND
Korea Journal
1965 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-840-003139461