메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국셰익스피어학회 Shakespeare Review Shakespeare Review Vol.37 No.2
발행연도
2001.6
수록면
281 - 300 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In comparison with Venus and Adonis, Shakespeare's Lucrece is inferior in its immediacy of experiences and vividness of its poetic language. As a whole, the poem is assumed a general failure. This failure is attributed to Shakespeare's failure to find out "objective correlatives" to represent Lucrece's violent experience of bodily disruption. Her body is liquidated into the abstract and the allegorical in the incessant circle of metaphor, metonymy and synecdoche. Her corporeality is translated into something other than itself because it has no other language than men's. Many digressions and the paragone between poesy and painting are the symptoms of Shakespeare's stammering before the "threshold experiences" bordering on the grammar of the established language and transcending it at the same time. Only at the time of her death Lucrece finds her own voice rejecting the men's pleas to forbid her suicide. However even then she consummates the violence initiated by Tarquin by unsheathing the harmful knife into her breasts. To the last she remains the property of men and is trapped into the dialectic of shame and honour, dominant social values of Roman men. Though Shakespeare treats a woman's tragedy in a narrative poem, he fails to depict the woman's violent experience in terms of her own language. Lucrece remains a male property to her death, and even after.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-840-003147081