지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2002.11
- 수록면
- 203 - 221 (19page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Culture Studies originated in the Great Britain in 1950s and 1960s, does not necessarily come to a realization with an unified character and an universal form. As an intellectual project, each Culture Studies bears unique historical background and also different form according to history of the nation in which Culture Studies has been performed. For example, there is profound difference in the way Culture Studies is carried out among in Great Britain where Culture Studies was originated, and in United States, and of course in the Latin America. This makes the historical meaning of the Culture Studies significant. It is of much importance to understand what kind of form does Culture Studies takes and why one can find various forms of the Culture Studies, in considering the practical aspect of Culture Studies. This means that Culture Studies itself is not performed in search for a sole project, but is deeply affected by the text or the language on which Culture Studies is carried out and the ideological attitude the researcher bears toward the text. In that sense, the Latin American Culture Studies its own value, and it shows a certain tendency in diverse spectrum of the theory camps in the Latin America, and complications and agony that the Latin American intellectual went through seeking alternatives for the globalization which has taken place since 1990s.
What this paper like to present is to draw the ‘cognitive map’ of the theory camps in the Latin America, covering the process that Culture Studies was discussed among Latin American intellectuals, and the historical context which caused the fundamental distinction, other than to introduce a mere general discussion about the nature of Culture Studies. Moreover, through this discussion, one can understand the characteristics the Latin American Culture Studies presents, and criticize a few concept about Latin American Culture Studies.
As we saw above, Culture Studies in the Latin America was formed in the state of both tension and cooperaton with literature criticism. With not only the hybriditical nature of the Latin American literature but also social stand Latin American writers has hold, one may say that the Latin American Culture Studies has been ahead of others in raising an issue in research method or in research criteria of Culture Studies. Due to the peculiar intellectual tradition in Latin American and Sociohistorical condition, one may see the Latin American Culture Studies has its ownand distinguished feature.
Unlike the western Culture Studies which took up most part of existing literature criticism after it was rapidly forced out of the scene, in Latin America Culture Studies actively absorbed the analyzing tools of literary criticism and broaden its criteria, in other words, cultural-researchization of literature criticism was the distinguished tendency in Latin America. The phenomenon that the theoretical concepts widely used in literary criticism are adapted as tools for analyzing the culture to the culture researcher is one evidence. On the other hand, whereas the western Culture Studies pursued bringing something political to substantial routine space, that is, micro-politics, the Latin American Culture Studies tried to solve politic problems in the very conceptual space-the Nation. That tells us about the intellectual complication of Latin American intellectuals who still has modern problems with them and attempts to solve this through ‘post-modern’ Culture Studies as a key. In short, Latin American Culture Studies adapting the tools general culture studies suggests, according to Latin American situation, searches for its own and unique method.
What this paper like to present is to draw the ‘cognitive map’ of the theory camps in the Latin America, covering the process that Culture Studies was discussed among Latin American intellectuals, and the historical context which caused the fundamental distinction, other than to introduce a mere general discussion about the nature of Culture Studies. Moreover, through this discussion, one can understand the characteristics the Latin American Culture Studies presents, and criticize a few concept about Latin American Culture Studies.
As we saw above, Culture Studies in the Latin America was formed in the state of both tension and cooperaton with literature criticism. With not only the hybriditical nature of the Latin American literature but also social stand Latin American writers has hold, one may say that the Latin American Culture Studies has been ahead of others in raising an issue in research method or in research criteria of Culture Studies. Due to the peculiar intellectual tradition in Latin American and Sociohistorical condition, one may see the Latin American Culture Studies has its ownand distinguished feature.
Unlike the western Culture Studies which took up most part of existing literature criticism after it was rapidly forced out of the scene, in Latin America Culture Studies actively absorbed the analyzing tools of literary criticism and broaden its criteria, in other words, cultural-researchization of literature criticism was the distinguished tendency in Latin America. The phenomenon that the theoretical concepts widely used in literary criticism are adapted as tools for analyzing the culture to the culture researcher is one evidence. On the other hand, whereas the western Culture Studies pursued bringing something political to substantial routine space, that is, micro-politics, the Latin American Culture Studies tried to solve politic problems in the very conceptual space-the Nation. That tells us about the intellectual complication of Latin American intellectuals who still has modern problems with them and attempts to solve this through ‘post-modern’ Culture Studies as a key. In short, Latin American Culture Studies adapting the tools general culture studies suggests, according to Latin American situation, searches for its own and unique method.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 중남미 문화연구의 일반적 특징
Ⅲ. 중남미 문화연구의 이론적 틀
Ⅳ. 결론
참고 문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
세계사 교과서의 라틴아메리카 관련 서술에 대한 검토와 대안적 구성의 제안
역사교육
2017 .06
-
중남미 협력 패러다임의 변화 -FDI를 중심으로-
스페인어문학
2005 .01
-
한국학생들의 미국문화에 관한 인식과 실제
인문학연구
2012 .12
-
중남미의 문화 경제학 -이베리아 반도에서의 그 기원(起源)을 중심으로-
스페인어문학
2012 .01
-
The Impact of American Culture on Korea
Korea Journal
1971 .07
-
[스페인·라틴아메리카] 이베로아메리카사 : 질적 수준의 심화와 경계 넘나들기
역사학보
2011 .09
-
[스페인ㆍ라틴아메리카] 연구영역의 확대와 새로운 단계로의 도약
역사학보
2013 .09
-
Review of Korean Culture
Korea Journal
1965 .03
-
Review of Korean Culture
Korea Journal
1965 .04
-
모더니티의 ‘이면’으로서 라틴 아메리카
외국문학연구
2003 .11
-
Korean’s View of America : Reflections on American Character and Culture
Korea Journal
1972 .05
-
문화 속의 우리와 타자 - 문화의 지역성과 세계성
철학연구
2003 .08
-
Teaching Latin in Italy : A Special Situation
서양고전학연구
2018 .12
-
중남미 이민과 한국의 재외동포정책
민족연구
2018 .01
-
종속이론 : 라틴아메리카 지식인들의 자기 발견
역사와경계
2014 .06
-
Latin Teaching in Poland : A Historical Outline and the Current Position
서양고전학연구
2016 .12
-
A Study of Korean-American Cultural Relations : With Emphasis on Koreans’ Perception of American Culture
Korea Journal
1978 .06
-
바람직한 제3세계 역사의 서술 방향 : 라틴아메리카 관련 서술의 경우
역사교육
2004 .12
-
라틴아메리카 포퓰리즘을 다시 생각한다 : 민중 개념의 재구성과 급진민주주의
역사비평
2013 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-705-003609306