지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2007.12
- 수록면
- 11 - 200 (191page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
We have made an effort to reform the Criminal Justice System and as a result, we could make the Statues on the Criminal Justice Reforms, which fortify the authorities and rights of the accused, or which mean clear in strengthening their rights. On the other hand, we need to be careful that a country, whose duties are doing the justice in crimes, often could be interfered with fact-finding. Because we can easily find in reality that the normal nation don't have a tendency to obey the rules and to state the truth even if they are satisfied with the revised legal systems and how fully guaranteed in Hebeas Corpus, we need to prepare the measures to fortify the obedience and strictness.
Under circumstances mentioned above, there needs to consider the introduction of Obstruction of Justice, one of the discussed things, with a view to strengthen the strictness. After the impeachment of W. J. Clinton in 1998, charging the obstruction of justice, Korea started to be concerned about it. Sometimes, the celebrities are guilty in obstruction of justice and this can show a lot of interests to people. Actually, Korean Criminal Law has the rules on 'Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties(Article 136)', 'Escape and Violation of Summoning Order(Article 145)', 'Special Escape(Article 146)', 'Helping Escape(Article 147)', 'Perjury, Malicious Perjury(Article 152)', 'Destruction of Evidence, etc. and Special Exception to Relatives(Article 155)', 'False Accusation(Article 156)', and these statutes are essentially in the boundary of Obstruction of Justice.
And there is a controversy on this subject that the possibility of punishment of 'False Statement of Suspect and Witness' and the possibility of punishment of 'False Presentment'. There are some reasons about these facts. As long as the accused's rights are guaranteed, they try to state false and hide the truth. For the Investigators, like the police and prosecutors, which take it a duty to find the suspects, sue the accused, find the truth and punish them, it is too hard in doing fact-finding that they have no choice but to focus the witness' statement, even if how hard they try to tell the false. While Perjury shall be punished by the Criminal Law Article 152, false statement at investigation can not be punished. And there needs to adopt a mandatory investigation because a witness will not attend the investigation.
'The Law Perversion', which means perverting the laws that the subject of criminal justice should apply and execute legitimately, is included in obstruction of justice in 'Abuse of Authority(Article 123)', 'Unlawful Arrest and Unlawful Confinement(Article 124)', 'Violence and Cruel Act(Article 125)'. As the accused can be a obstacles in criminal justice, the subject of criminal justice naturally be the same. So, the act of perversion of law need to be punished in fairness of criminal justice.
Hereinafter, there will be the consideration about necessity of obstruction of justice, false statements for the fact-finding in criminal process, and the boundary of punishment, legislation's style and so on.
Under circumstances mentioned above, there needs to consider the introduction of Obstruction of Justice, one of the discussed things, with a view to strengthen the strictness. After the impeachment of W. J. Clinton in 1998, charging the obstruction of justice, Korea started to be concerned about it. Sometimes, the celebrities are guilty in obstruction of justice and this can show a lot of interests to people. Actually, Korean Criminal Law has the rules on 'Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties(Article 136)', 'Escape and Violation of Summoning Order(Article 145)', 'Special Escape(Article 146)', 'Helping Escape(Article 147)', 'Perjury, Malicious Perjury(Article 152)', 'Destruction of Evidence, etc. and Special Exception to Relatives(Article 155)', 'False Accusation(Article 156)', and these statutes are essentially in the boundary of Obstruction of Justice.
And there is a controversy on this subject that the possibility of punishment of 'False Statement of Suspect and Witness' and the possibility of punishment of 'False Presentment'. There are some reasons about these facts. As long as the accused's rights are guaranteed, they try to state false and hide the truth. For the Investigators, like the police and prosecutors, which take it a duty to find the suspects, sue the accused, find the truth and punish them, it is too hard in doing fact-finding that they have no choice but to focus the witness' statement, even if how hard they try to tell the false. While Perjury shall be punished by the Criminal Law Article 152, false statement at investigation can not be punished. And there needs to adopt a mandatory investigation because a witness will not attend the investigation.
'The Law Perversion', which means perverting the laws that the subject of criminal justice should apply and execute legitimately, is included in obstruction of justice in 'Abuse of Authority(Article 123)', 'Unlawful Arrest and Unlawful Confinement(Article 124)', 'Violence and Cruel Act(Article 125)'. As the accused can be a obstacles in criminal justice, the subject of criminal justice naturally be the same. So, the act of perversion of law need to be punished in fairness of criminal justice.
Hereinafter, there will be the consideration about necessity of obstruction of justice, false statements for the fact-finding in criminal process, and the boundary of punishment, legislation's style and so on.
목차
국문요약
제1장 서론
제2장 미국 사법방해행위의 유형
제3장 독일ㆍ프랑스 사법방해행위의 유형
제4장 일본 사법방해행위의 유형
제5장 우리나라에서 사법방해행위에 대한 형사법적 규제와 한계
제6장 사법방해행위의 입법화방안
참고문헌
영문요약
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
2011년도 형법ㆍ형사소송법 및 형사특별법 제ㆍ개정안 분석과 입법정책 개선방안
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2011 .12
-
형사정책연구 30년의 성과와 과제(II) : 형사법 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2019 .03
-
치료적 사법모델의 형사정책적 도입방안 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2011 .12
-
형법각칙 개정연구 [9] : 우리나라 및 주요 국가의 형법개정 동향
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2007 .12
-
새로운 범죄대응전략으로서 화해조정체계구축방안(Ⅱ) - 형사화해조정체계의 구축을 위한 법적ㆍ제도적 정비방안 총괄보고서
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2009 .12
-
형사특별법 정비방안(4) 특정경제범죄가중처벌법등에관한법률
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2008 .12
-
中國 刑法上 犯罪過程에서의 犯罪形態
법학연구
2005 .06
-
형법각칙 개정연구 [1] : 형법각칙의 개정방향과 기본문제
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2007 .12
-
형사특별법의 입법구조와 이론적 기초
비교형사법연구
2012 .01
-
형사사법절차상 형사합의 관행의 실태분석과 제도화 방안
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2014 .12
-
우리나라 형사화해제도에 대한 검토
동아법학
2009 .08
-
사회변동과 형법의 과제
비교형사법연구
2010 .01
-
조선시대의 형사법제 연구 : 조선 형사법제와 현행 형법과의 비교법적 검토(각론)
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2016 .12
-
범죄 및 형사정책에 대한 법경제학적 접근(Ⅲ) : 비용편익분석을 중심으로
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2011 .12
-
형사특별법의 입법구조와 이론적 기초
비교형사법연구
2009 .01
-
조선시대의 형사법제 연구 : 총칙의 현대 형사법 편제에 따른 재정립
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2015 .12
-
형사사법모델과 한국 형사사법 특성에 관한 연구
한국공안행정학회보
2006 .01
-
犯罪의 國際化와 刑法의 役割
형사정책연구
2002 .09
-
한국형법 개정의 올바른 방향 -형법총칙을 중심으로-
비교형사법연구
2012 .01
-
범죄피해자와 형사절차참여에 관한 고찰
피해자학연구
2008 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-364-003949317