지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
There has been so many literatures about the Korean War since the Armistice Agreement. However, most of the works have been focused upon the issue of who shot first, or have been exploring the origin of the war, partly because they are very important issues related to a war which could not possibly be legitimized, and partly thanks to all the documents newly declassified in the early 1990s when the Soviet and Communist regimes collapsed in Russia and several Eastern European countries. So many of the declassified documents have provided clear evidences that the war broke out under the collusion between Stalin and Kim Il-sung.
It is kind of a vicious circle that a perspective has to be changed whenever new materials are declassified. I believe that historiography and narratives could be revised, but perspective should be regarded as a different mater. A perspective that needs to be changed according to materials, would not be appropriate to be adopted as a viewpoint in the first place. In the 60th year of the breakout of the war, I would like to propose a perspective that would be helpful in interpreting the nature of the Korean War, instead of providing new materials.
First of all, perception and calculation of the actors and policy makers, rather than the overall structure, should be more examined. Second, comparative analysis should be presented, in order to redefine the Korean War as a World history event which could provide lessons to the people today. Third, the Armistice system, which has become a fundamental problem causing security crises in the Korean Peninsula for the last 57 years, should be reviewed. And last, memories of the war deserves some attention, since they are no mere perceptions of a past event, but are working rather as a real political power that could shape and move the opinion of the public.
It is kind of a vicious circle that a perspective has to be changed whenever new materials are declassified. I believe that historiography and narratives could be revised, but perspective should be regarded as a different mater. A perspective that needs to be changed according to materials, would not be appropriate to be adopted as a viewpoint in the first place. In the 60th year of the breakout of the war, I would like to propose a perspective that would be helpful in interpreting the nature of the Korean War, instead of providing new materials.
First of all, perception and calculation of the actors and policy makers, rather than the overall structure, should be more examined. Second, comparative analysis should be presented, in order to redefine the Korean War as a World history event which could provide lessons to the people today. Third, the Armistice system, which has become a fundamental problem causing security crises in the Korean Peninsula for the last 57 years, should be reviewed. And last, memories of the war deserves some attention, since they are no mere perceptions of a past event, but are working rather as a real political power that could shape and move the opinion of the public.
목차
1. 60년 간의 한국전쟁 연구
2. 구조가 아닌 생각의 문제
3. 비교사적 방법론 도입의 필요성
4. 정전협상 및 협정 문제에 대한 접근
5. 전쟁의 영향, 그리고 기억의 문제
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (31)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - 박태균 / 2006 / 우방과 제국 / 창비
2. [단행본] - 박태균 / 2005 / 한국과 전쟁 / 책과 함께
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이완범 / 2006 / 한국전쟁 발발 직전의 상황: 내전설과 남침유도설에 대한 비판적 조망 －한국전쟁:38선 충돌과 전쟁의 형성(정병준, 돌베개, 2006)－ / 역사와 현실 (62) : 377 ~ 397
4. [단행본] - 김동춘 / 2006 / 전쟁과 사회 / 돌베개
5. [단행본] - Rosmary Foot / 1990 / Substitute for Victory:The Politics of Peacemaking at the Korean Armistice Talks / Cornell University Press
2. [단행본] - 박태균 / 2005 / 한국과 전쟁 / 책과 함께
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이완범 / 2006 / 한국전쟁 발발 직전의 상황: 내전설과 남침유도설에 대한 비판적 조망 －한국전쟁:38선 충돌과 전쟁의 형성(정병준, 돌베개, 2006)－ / 역사와 현실 (62) : 377 ~ 397
4. [단행본] - 김동춘 / 2006 / 전쟁과 사회 / 돌베개
5. [단행본] - Rosmary Foot / 1990 / Substitute for Victory:The Politics of Peacemaking at the Korean Armistice Talks / Cornell University Press
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Korean War 1950-1953
Korea Journal
1967 .07
-
한국전쟁 60년, 한반도와 세계
역사비평
2010 .05
-
한국전쟁기 전쟁시의 국가주의의 시선
한국시학연구
2008 .04
-
‘전쟁의 기억’과 ‘기억의 전쟁’ : 특별한 피난체험을 중심으로
통일인문학
2014 .03
-
Literature After the Korean War
Korea Journal
1977 .06
-
Perspectives on the Korean War in Japanese High School Textbooks : Research Trends of Japanese Academia and their Reflection in the Textbooks
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2009 .03
-
냉전 초기 사회주의진영 내부의 전쟁·평화 담론의 충돌과 북한의 한국전쟁 인식 변화
역사와현실
2012 .03
-
한국전쟁의 기본개념으로서 제한전(limited war)의 성립과 분화 : 한반도에 대한 전략적 가치 평가와 관련하여
한국사연구
2004 .06
-
북한의 한국전쟁 계획 수립과 소련의 역할
역사와현실
2007 .12
-
War and Memory in Korean History
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2004 .09
-
한국 전쟁영화의 발전과 특징 : 한국전쟁에서 베트남전쟁까지
지방사와 지방문화
2006 .11
-
The Korean War and Viewpoints of Korean Novels
Korea Journal
1981 .06
-
한국전쟁기 38선 북진과 냉전의 고착화
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2005 .12
-
재한 서구 개신교 선교사와 제1차 세계대전 : 「한국선교지(Korea Mission Field)」를 중심으로
신학연구
2014 .12
-
사상심리전의 텍스트로서 한국전쟁 : 자유세계로의 확산과 동아시아적 귀환
역사비평
2017 .02
-
1960년대 문학과 6·25의 기억
세계문학비교연구
2011 .01
-
한국소설에 나타난 베트남 전쟁의 특성과 참전 한국군의 정체성
한국현대문학연구
2003 .12
-
한국전쟁과 여성 : 경계에 선 여성들
역사비평
2010 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-911-003773869