지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
China made a commitment in regards to the judicial review through legal documents including Protocol on the Accession of the People's Republic of China. China's commitment of the judicial review is stricter and broader than what WTO asks. There are two reasons why China made such a broad and strict commitment of the judicial review. One reason is that WTO demands WTO new members stricter judicial review system because of doubts that might be low rule of law in the new members. Hence, new WTO members like China, Armenia, Nepal and Cambodia have a separate section of judicial review in their commitment to the entry of WTO. The other reason is that the Chinese government wanted to show the international community that China's trade policy and rule of law are established and especially WTO members which invest in China can be protected by law in the area of trade, investment and intellectual property rights.
From the perspective of Chinese international business transaction law, study on China's judicial review is very important. Because the party can be Korean and Korean companies that uses the China's domestic judicial review. For example, a Korean corporation is able to appeal the People's Court of China against decision of antidumping by China's commerce ministry. However, the point that we have to pay attention is that there has not been even one judicial review on 40 cases of trade remedy exercised by the Chinese government. It means that China's judicial review has a institutional and procedural problems which makes difficult to use. If we have confidence that improved Chinese judicial review are fairly processed, then we should use well the system.
The paper, first of all, reviews general rules of China's judicial review, and especially focuses on the regulations and application of Judicial Review in Intellectual Property Rights. It includes that what China made a promise related to Judicial Review in Intellectual Property Rights, and also what should be revised compared to WTO TRIPs. The paper, finally, shows how Judicial Review in Intellectual Property Rights effects Korean and Korean companies.
From the perspective of Chinese international business transaction law, study on China's judicial review is very important. Because the party can be Korean and Korean companies that uses the China's domestic judicial review. For example, a Korean corporation is able to appeal the People's Court of China against decision of antidumping by China's commerce ministry. However, the point that we have to pay attention is that there has not been even one judicial review on 40 cases of trade remedy exercised by the Chinese government. It means that China's judicial review has a institutional and procedural problems which makes difficult to use. If we have confidence that improved Chinese judicial review are fairly processed, then we should use well the system.
The paper, first of all, reviews general rules of China's judicial review, and especially focuses on the regulations and application of Judicial Review in Intellectual Property Rights. It includes that what China made a promise related to Judicial Review in Intellectual Property Rights, and also what should be revised compared to WTO TRIPs. The paper, finally, shows how Judicial Review in Intellectual Property Rights effects Korean and Korean companies.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. TRIPs협정과 사법심사제도
Ⅲ. 지적재산권과 중국의 사법심사제도
Ⅳ. 중국 지적재산권 사법심사제도의 문제와 개선점
Ⅴ. 시사점 및 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (18)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김철 / 2004 / 무역구제조치에 대한 중국의 사법심사제도 / 무역구제
2. [학위논문] - 김철 / 2005 / WTO협정상의 국내사법심사제도 / 박사
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 유예리 / 2009 / 국제법의 국내 적용에 관한 중국법체계 / 중국학연구 (49) : 437 ~ 464
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 하현수 / 2007 / 중국의 국제상사중재 사법심사에 관한 연구 / 국제상학 22 (3) : 135 ~ 157
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 최송자 / 2005 / 중국의 무역구제 사법심사제도에 관한 연구 / 통상법률 (66) : 71 ~ 98
2. [학위논문] - 김철 / 2005 / WTO협정상의 국내사법심사제도 / 박사
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 유예리 / 2009 / 국제법의 국내 적용에 관한 중국법체계 / 중국학연구 (49) : 437 ~ 464
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 하현수 / 2007 / 중국의 국제상사중재 사법심사에 관한 연구 / 국제상학 22 (3) : 135 ~ 157
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 최송자 / 2005 / 중국의 무역구제 사법심사제도에 관한 연구 / 통상법률 (66) : 71 ~ 98
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중국 사법개혁 현황과 시사점
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2014 .12
-
中國의 WTO加入이후 무역환경변화와 韓國의 대응방안
관세학회지
2004 .02
-
대법원장의 지위와 사법행정권
서강법학
2009 .06
-
중국 사법해석제도에 관한 고찰 : 최고인민법원의 사법해석을 중심으로
비교사법
2008 .06
-
중국의 WTO가입 이후 외국인 직접투자전략 변화와 한국 기업의 대중국투자 촉진 방안
무역학회지
2003 .09
-
한국과 중국 간 민사사법공조조약에 관한 소고
기업법연구
2005 .09
-
The Supreme Court`s Endorsement of A Politicized Judiciary : A Philosophical Critique
법학논총
2014 .01
-
중국의 WTO 가입전망과 경제개혁
국제관계연구
1996 .06
-
韓國의 司法制度改革의 動向과 課題
동아법학
2007 .08
-
중국 지적재산권법에 관한 연구
경영법률
2010 .01
-
中國의 WTO 加入과 國有企業 改革에 관한 硏究
통상법률
2002 .12
-
WTO가입이후, 중국의 WTO분쟁해결기구에서의 역할과 전망
법학연구
2013 .05
-
중국의 지적재산권 보호제도
기업법연구
2007 .03
-
中韓司法協助的現狀及其未來
국제사법연구
2009 .12
-
사법심사의 정당성 논란에 대한 관견
동아법학
2011 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000490726