지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper analyse current interpretation of the “causal link” that in particular, focuses principally on the so-called “non-attribution” requirement of Article 4.2(b) of the Safeguards Agreement. The safeguard measures are justified as a temporary economic adjustment to harm that is caused by an increase in imports. The problem with this justification is that there are other kinds of economic forces that may injure domestic industries, such as changes in consumer tastes, government spending or a lack thereof, and economic downturns. These problems do not justify government-imposed remedies. When factors therefore other than increased imports are causing injury to the domestic industry at the same time, such injury shall not be attributed to increased imports.
The Appellate Body stressed that a contribution of third-party imports to the existence of serious injury must be sufficiently clear as to establish the existence of the causal link required, it found that Article 4.2(b) does not suggest that increased imports be the sole cause of the serious injury, or that other factors causing injury must be excluded from the determination of serious injury.
The interest in separation is to ensure that a measure is not applied to remedy harm not caused by imports, but this basic point assumes that the harm is distinguishable in the first place. It also assumes that the safeguard is designed to respond to harm caused by imports. In fact safeguards were never intended to respond to this kind of unfair trade, but rather to provide whatever emergency relief might assist an ailing domestic industry if imports happened to be a part of that injury. The Appellate Body’s insistence in breaking cause and effect down to minutia in the non-attribution analysis seems to be so overly intricate that it conflicts with it’s broader focus on evaluating factors that effect harm on the industry as a whole.
The Appellate Body stressed that a contribution of third-party imports to the existence of serious injury must be sufficiently clear as to establish the existence of the causal link required, it found that Article 4.2(b) does not suggest that increased imports be the sole cause of the serious injury, or that other factors causing injury must be excluded from the determination of serious injury.
The interest in separation is to ensure that a measure is not applied to remedy harm not caused by imports, but this basic point assumes that the harm is distinguishable in the first place. It also assumes that the safeguard is designed to respond to harm caused by imports. In fact safeguards were never intended to respond to this kind of unfair trade, but rather to provide whatever emergency relief might assist an ailing domestic industry if imports happened to be a part of that injury. The Appellate Body’s insistence in breaking cause and effect down to minutia in the non-attribution analysis seems to be so overly intricate that it conflicts with it’s broader focus on evaluating factors that effect harm on the industry as a whole.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. SG제도와 인과관계
Ⅲ. 세이프가드협정 제4.2조의 해석에 관한 사건분석
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
탄소강관 수입에 대한 미국의 세이프가드 조치 분쟁사건
국제경제법연구
2004 .12
-
한국의 Service Safeguard의 개선방안에 관한 연구
관세학회지
2005 .05
-
인도네시아 Safeguard규정에 관한 고찰
관세학회지
2003 .12
-
세이프가드협정상의 국내산업 범위에 대한 해석
통상정보연구
2006 .06
-
특정 유제품의 수입에 대한 한정적 세이프가드 조치
국제경제법연구
2004 .12
-
AN ANALYSIS OF THE KEY PROVISIONS OF THE AGREEMENT ON SAFEGUARDS : STRATEGIC APPROACH TO FOREIGN SAFEGUARD MEASURES ON KOREAN IMPORTS
무역학자 전국대회 발표논문집
2002 .08
-
WTO 세이프가드 인과관계 기준 및 수준에 관한 연구
통상법률
2016 .02
-
세이프가드조치의 적법성 평가를 위한 심사기준의 적용에 관한 연구
통상정보연구
2007 .06
-
수출이 수입유발에 미치는 효과에 관한 연구
통상정보연구
2007 .12
-
한국 IT제조업의 수입구조와 수입유발효과 변화추이 연구 : 산업연관분석을 중심으로
무역학회지
2010 .02
-
중국 세이프가드제도에 관한 고찰
한국관세학회 학술대회
2007 .11
-
Changing Import Preferences and Their Impact on The Effects of Trade Liberalization
Journal of International Logistics and Trade
2015 .12
-
Determinants of Korea's Imports and its Effects on Distribution of Firms
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2017 .10
-
산업피해구제제도에 있어서의 공익개념의 도입
무역학회지
2000 .12
-
세이프가드의 파편화와 WTO의 역할
강원법학
2008 .06
-
중국 셰이프가드제도에 관한 고찰
관세학회지
2007 .12
-
수입물품의 급증에 대한 긴급수입제한제도(Safeguards)의 관련 기능 강화
산업경제연구
2000 .11
-
Revitalization of GATT Article XIX Unforeseen Developments Clause
국제경제법연구
2010 .05
-
Estimating Import Demand Function for the United States
아태비즈니스연구
2019 .01
-
미국 반덤핑법의 국내산업 피해판정기준 운용에 관한 고찰
무역연구
2011 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-326-000785264