지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2008.9
- 수록면
- 47 - 64 (18page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Almost half a year has passed since Lee Myung-Bak government was inaugurated, but there has been few remarkable achievements in various policy arenas. In terms of decentralization policy, it is difficult to find out even its policy direction.
Lee government is different from the previous Rho government in terms of its ideology and subsequently policy contents. The latter was basically a liberal, left-wing government emphasizing such values as participation, distribution and equality whereas the former is a conservative, right-wing government with a special focus on the value of pragmatism, growth and competition.
The Rho Moo-Hyun Administration, dubbed as the “Participatory Government”, set up a decentralization policy as one of its major policy goals. To this end, it even created the Presidential Committee on Government Innovation and Decentralization(PCGID), and under the PCGID the auxiliary Executive Committee for Decentralizatian(PCGID) prepared a decentralization Roadmap containing specific reform items. However, the current Lee government have so far made no specific efforts on decentralization policy.
In this paper, it was first tried to evaluate those achievements of Rho government’s decentralization policy and then various policy tasks that were not resolved under the former administration and still remained to be solved by the current government. Secondly, after a review on the ‘Special Act on Promotion of Decentralization’ was made, some policy recommendations were suggested to Lee government in terms of tasks, system, and strategy of decentralization policy.
In broad terms, the decentralization policy tasks facing Lee government can be summarized as the following ten subjects:
1. Consolidating a number of field offices of central departments
2. Reforming the autonomy system of education
3. Introducing local police system
4. Devolving the national affairs to local governments
5. Strengthening local financial capacity
6. Reforming local council system
7. Reforming local election system
8. Promoting citizen participation in local governance
9. Enhancing local administrative capability
10. Building cooperative relationship between central-local governments
According to the Special Act on Promotion of Decentralization, Lee government did define the concept of decentralization not as the transfer of power from central to local governments but as the distribution of power between central and local governments. It means that the current governments regards a decentralization as two-way movements trying to find out the balancing points between centralization and decentralization.
The point which this paper tried to make is that the most important thing in pursuing the decentralizing policy is to gain people’s support for it. In order to make people support the decentralization policy, it is critical to spread the so-called ‘decentralization mind-set’ among all walks of life. The essence of decentralization is a kind of power game between centralists and decentralists. The former always oppose a decentralization because they fear to lose their established power because of decentralization. Their such zero-sum perspective is a formidable obstacle in pursuing decentralization policy.
東北アジアの3?という韓?、中?、日本間の交流はこの間、これらの特色の?米中心の貿易交流から次第に?け出し、域?間の交流を中心に?わっている?況である。例えば、2003年度は中?の最大の貿易パ?トナ?はアメリカではなく日本になり、2004年度は韓?が日本より?中?の投資優位?になった程だ。また、韓?と日本の企業が中?で雇っている??者の?は2004年度にもう1000万名を越えて中?の????にも莫大な影響を及ぼすと見られる。もちろん、このような民間市場の中心の?家間の交流だけではなく自治??を中心にする?際交流も盛んになっている。本文にも調べるが東北アジアを中心にする自治??間の交流がこのように活?な理由として自治??は中央政府の外交政策と割合に無?係だという視点が支配的であってが、領土問題、?科書問題等に?する抗議の方法で他?との姉妹?組の?絶等を見ると、自治??の?際交流も中央政府の外交政策と全然無?係だとは見られない。ここに本稿では韓?と日本、中?の地方自治??の?際交流の特徵を探索して21世紀の?家に相?しい地方自治??の?際交流の?展の方向を模索しようとする。2008年度、韓?，中?，日本は新しい政?という共通点がある。FTA，北朝鮮問題などの異見は確かにある。しかし世界??で占める東北アジア(韓?，中?，日本) 3ヶ?ばかりしても1998度に全世界交易規模$105，340億の中、$12，183億を占めて11.56%を記?したうえ、2003年度には一層加速化して全世界交易規模$125，780億の中、$20，752億の16.49%を記?して全世界の一番金持ち地域になったのだ。したがって韓?政府や日本政府は北東アジア中心の??ブロックを構想することは??政策を推進する段階で非常に有利だという判?が可能だが、日本の場合は中?に?する牽制心理と北朝鮮問題が?っているので北東アジア中心よりは東アジアと言うASEAN+3は?心が高くなることも事?である。
その反面、韓?と中?では北東アジア共同?という用語がたびたび登場するが、この場合にも韓?と中?の立場は全く違う。中?の北東アジアは東北3性(??江省，吉林省，遼寧省)と韓半島と日本を上程している。中?の立場では中?を北東アジア共同?に限定することに決して?足できなし、(ギムミョンソブ，2002)。そうであるため、韓?と日本に局限させて見るとしてもこの地域での北東アジア共同?の推進は同床異夢であるつつ、その結果、自治??の?際交流も??の推進?相が違うという点だ。すなわち，韓?の地方自治?は日本と隣りという?点で接近する傾向が?いと思うなら、日本の自治??の場合は相?的に地域??が立ち後れされた自治??の中心に自ら?際交流を地域活性化政策の一部として推進していると見られる。
希望的な点は韓?、中?、日本の?際交流が??中心から文化中心に?わっているのもその中心には自治??の?際交流が大きい役を??しているという点だ。他?の間の自治???際交流が文化行事の共同主催だけでなくお互いの言語を?ぶ人?に?する自治??の政策的思いやりなど今までとは他に目の前の?利中心で相互間に文化的理解を助ける方向に進展になって行っていると見られる。したがって?家間の平和的でお互いの情?及び文化を理解する?際交流になるためには中央政府よりは地方自治?，、そして地方自治?よりは市民社?間の交流が主にならなければならないという点を?調したい。
Lee government is different from the previous Rho government in terms of its ideology and subsequently policy contents. The latter was basically a liberal, left-wing government emphasizing such values as participation, distribution and equality whereas the former is a conservative, right-wing government with a special focus on the value of pragmatism, growth and competition.
The Rho Moo-Hyun Administration, dubbed as the “Participatory Government”, set up a decentralization policy as one of its major policy goals. To this end, it even created the Presidential Committee on Government Innovation and Decentralization(PCGID), and under the PCGID the auxiliary Executive Committee for Decentralizatian(PCGID) prepared a decentralization Roadmap containing specific reform items. However, the current Lee government have so far made no specific efforts on decentralization policy.
In this paper, it was first tried to evaluate those achievements of Rho government’s decentralization policy and then various policy tasks that were not resolved under the former administration and still remained to be solved by the current government. Secondly, after a review on the ‘Special Act on Promotion of Decentralization’ was made, some policy recommendations were suggested to Lee government in terms of tasks, system, and strategy of decentralization policy.
In broad terms, the decentralization policy tasks facing Lee government can be summarized as the following ten subjects:
1. Consolidating a number of field offices of central departments
2. Reforming the autonomy system of education
3. Introducing local police system
4. Devolving the national affairs to local governments
5. Strengthening local financial capacity
6. Reforming local council system
7. Reforming local election system
8. Promoting citizen participation in local governance
9. Enhancing local administrative capability
10. Building cooperative relationship between central-local governments
According to the Special Act on Promotion of Decentralization, Lee government did define the concept of decentralization not as the transfer of power from central to local governments but as the distribution of power between central and local governments. It means that the current governments regards a decentralization as two-way movements trying to find out the balancing points between centralization and decentralization.
The point which this paper tried to make is that the most important thing in pursuing the decentralizing policy is to gain people’s support for it. In order to make people support the decentralization policy, it is critical to spread the so-called ‘decentralization mind-set’ among all walks of life. The essence of decentralization is a kind of power game between centralists and decentralists. The former always oppose a decentralization because they fear to lose their established power because of decentralization. Their such zero-sum perspective is a formidable obstacle in pursuing decentralization policy.
東北アジアの3?という韓?、中?、日本間の交流はこの間、これらの特色の?米中心の貿易交流から次第に?け出し、域?間の交流を中心に?わっている?況である。例えば、2003年度は中?の最大の貿易パ?トナ?はアメリカではなく日本になり、2004年度は韓?が日本より?中?の投資優位?になった程だ。また、韓?と日本の企業が中?で雇っている??者の?は2004年度にもう1000万名を越えて中?の????にも莫大な影響を及ぼすと見られる。もちろん、このような民間市場の中心の?家間の交流だけではなく自治??を中心にする?際交流も盛んになっている。本文にも調べるが東北アジアを中心にする自治??間の交流がこのように活?な理由として自治??は中央政府の外交政策と割合に無?係だという視点が支配的であってが、領土問題、?科書問題等に?する抗議の方法で他?との姉妹?組の?絶等を見ると、自治??の?際交流も中央政府の外交政策と全然無?係だとは見られない。ここに本稿では韓?と日本、中?の地方自治??の?際交流の特徵を探索して21世紀の?家に相?しい地方自治??の?際交流の?展の方向を模索しようとする。2008年度、韓?，中?，日本は新しい政?という共通点がある。FTA，北朝鮮問題などの異見は確かにある。しかし世界??で占める東北アジア(韓?，中?，日本) 3ヶ?ばかりしても1998度に全世界交易規模$105，340億の中、$12，183億を占めて11.56%を記?したうえ、2003年度には一層加速化して全世界交易規模$125，780億の中、$20，752億の16.49%を記?して全世界の一番金持ち地域になったのだ。したがって韓?政府や日本政府は北東アジア中心の??ブロックを構想することは??政策を推進する段階で非常に有利だという判?が可能だが、日本の場合は中?に?する牽制心理と北朝鮮問題が?っているので北東アジア中心よりは東アジアと言うASEAN+3は?心が高くなることも事?である。
その反面、韓?と中?では北東アジア共同?という用語がたびたび登場するが、この場合にも韓?と中?の立場は全く違う。中?の北東アジアは東北3性(??江省，吉林省，遼寧省)と韓半島と日本を上程している。中?の立場では中?を北東アジア共同?に限定することに決して?足できなし、(ギムミョンソブ，2002)。そうであるため、韓?と日本に局限させて見るとしてもこの地域での北東アジア共同?の推進は同床異夢であるつつ、その結果、自治??の?際交流も??の推進?相が違うという点だ。すなわち，韓?の地方自治?は日本と隣りという?点で接近する傾向が?いと思うなら、日本の自治??の場合は相?的に地域??が立ち後れされた自治??の中心に自ら?際交流を地域活性化政策の一部として推進していると見られる。
希望的な点は韓?、中?、日本の?際交流が??中心から文化中心に?わっているのもその中心には自治??の?際交流が大きい役を??しているという点だ。他?の間の自治???際交流が文化行事の共同主催だけでなくお互いの言語を?ぶ人?に?する自治??の政策的思いやりなど今までとは他に目の前の?利中心で相互間に文化的理解を助ける方向に進展になって行っていると見られる。したがって?家間の平和的でお互いの情?及び文化を理解する?際交流になるためには中央政府よりは地方自治?，、そして地方自治?よりは市民社?間の交流が主にならなければならないという点を?調したい。
목차
〈要約〉
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 이론적 탐색 및 자치단체 간 국제교류
Ⅲ. 한국과 일본의 자치단체 간 국제교류 현황 분석
Ⅳ. 동북아 자치단체 간 국제교류의 전망
Ⅴ. 결론
〈참고문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
이명박 정부하의 지방분권정책 : 추진과제, 체제 및 전략을 중심으로
한국지방정부학회 학술대회자료집
2008 .09
-
Decentralization Policies in Korea : Problems and Tasks
한국비교정부학보
2007 .01
-
지방자치단체간 분권연대의 필요성과 가능성 : 대상사업을 중심으로
경기논단
2005 .03
-
이탈리아의 지방분권 및 시사점
경기논단
2004 .09
-
Decentralization Policies in Korea : Problems and Tasks
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2007 .12
-
Did Local Governments Really Become More Efficient after Decentralization?
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2003 .10
-
참여정부의 행정분권법제에 대한 평가- 地方自治의 理念과 地方分權 -
지방자치법연구
2005 .01
-
지방분권 개혁의 단계별 제도적 이슈
한국사회와 행정연구
2004 .05
-
참여정부의 지방분권정책의 공법적 과제
공법학연구
2004 .12
-
Decentralization Reform of the Participation Government in Korea : The Process and a Midterm Evaluation of Decentralization Reform
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2005 .04
-
Levels of Decentralization in the Republic of Korea and Future Policy Directions
한국자치행정학보
2014 .01
-
지방분권화와 문화행정을 통한 지방재정확충방안에 관한 연구
문화산업연구
2005 .06
-
재정분권 추진에 따른 경기도 재정운영 대응 전략
정책연구
2019 .04
-
Population Decentralization Policy of Korean Urban Areas
人口問題論集
1973 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
경기도의 중국인 관광객 유치 전략 : 자매결연도시를 중심으로
김기철
,
최성환
,
김흥식
외 2명
정책연구
2015
.07
지역경제발전을 향한 새로운 접근방법의 모색 : 성장 동력에 관한 논쟁을 중심으로
차재권
,
류태건
지방정부연구
2014
.08
중국의 경제성장과 지방분권
조성호
,
이홍규
,
이용환
이슈&진단
2012
.05
APEC의 지역경제 파급효과 재검토
주수현
,
유영명
,
김형빈
지방정부연구
2005
.05
지방정부의 다자간 국제협력 활성화 방안에 관한 연구 : 강원도의 경험을 중심으로
황원규
지방정부연구
2005
.08
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-359-001371661