메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이영재 (경북대학교)
저널정보
한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제83호
발행연도
2012.3
수록면
21 - 57 (37page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
As the Sui(隨) Dynasty united China in 589, Goguryeo(高句麗), which shared borders with Sui, came to encounter some serious threats and therefore aggressively pursued several options to deal with the situation. Yet the option of reopening negotiations with Wae(倭) was not one of them.
Goguryeo had already been making preparations before the Sui unification. King Pyeong’weon-wang(平原王) established his leadership with his military actions, and also made ‘babo(“The Fool”)’ Ondal(溫達) his son-in-law, in an effort to strengthen his own royal authority. The king and his followers also initiated the battle at the Adan-seong fortress(阿旦城), as an effort to seize a political initiative.
But. the battle at Adan-seong was a complete failure, and Supreme commander Ondal himself was killed in action. As a result, diplomacy came to be considered as the new option. Such initiative was led by ruling nobles and not the king. And around that time period, Wae, which had formal diplomatic experiences with Goguryeo in the 570s, was expressing interest in Goguryeo by sending envoys in the 580s. Therefore, Goguryeo resumed the negotiation with Wae in 595, following the defeat at Adan in proximately 594.

목차

머리말
1. 국왕의 위상과 군사지휘권
2. 온달의 등용과 국왕권 강화
3. 아단성 전투의 패전과 대왜 교섭의 재개(再開)
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (67)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-911-001693706