메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
송인재 (한림대학교)
저널정보
영남대학교 중국연구센터 중국과 중국학 중국과 중국학 제16호
발행연도
2012.6
수록면
99 - 123 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
After cultural revolution the policy of reform and opening up brought the change of academic studies in China. In this times, Chinese intellectuals tried to change the method of researches. Especially, they wanted to escape from the materialistic historical view and revolutionary view of history. History wasn’t also exception in this reform. Recently, A study of conceptual history appeared as the new trend. This study is originated from the conceptual history study which is invented by Germany historian Reinhart Koselleck(1923∼2006). Conceptual history applied ‘linguistic turn’ to History. In contemporary China, conceptual history doesn’t simply mean the simple import of the theories or the fashion of the linguistic studies. It’s purpose is the reinterpretation of chines modernity, the reform of the History in China etc.
The leader of enlightenment movement in 1980s, Jin Guantao & Liu Qingfeng entered to the study of the history of ideas for overcoming the limitation of the intellectual history study which concentrates on some famous thinkers or their text. The method of searching keyword in database is their unique method of their study. Through this study they argue that the original value of the enlightenment must be realized in China and proposed the periodization in Chinese history. Feng Tianyu studied the history of concept in modern China in the frame of the interaction of China, the West and Japan. He certified that the concepts made in Japan were originated from Chinese classical texts. Through this he proposed ‘return graphic loan’ model. The other theme of his study is the concept of feudal in China. He argues that the hole pre-modern period in China must not be called feudal period. This view is opposite to the official view of Chinese government and the mainstream of historians in China. The group of young historians insisted directly that the conceptual history study can be the new way of History in China. Sun Jiang and Huang Xintao represent this group. Sun’s major is social history and Huang’s major is cultural history. They accepted directly the German conceptual history study. Especially, Huang influenced from the New Cultural Histoy in U.S.A which opposes historical materialism and regard the conceptual history as one of the trend of the New Cultural History. This approach is also opposite to the view of existing History in China.
In conclusion, the conceptual history study fulfills the function of reforming History of China in the reform and opening up period.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 키워드연구를 통한 정치이데올로기 비판
Ⅲ. 역사문화의 심층 파악과 ‘봉건’ 개념 재고(再考)
Ⅳ. ‘신사학(新史學)’으로서의 개념사
Ⅴ. 평가와 전망
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (28)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-912-003573651