메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
조경란 (연세대학교)
저널정보
역사비평사 역사비평 역사비평 2016년 가을호(통권 제116호)
발행연도
2016.8
수록면
319 - 352 (35page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article is a critical analysis of Kojin Karatani’s work - The structure of empire - center, periphery, semi periphery, especially on China. Empire theory of Karatani is a discourse predicated on the rise of China. He divides the Chinese Empire into center, periphery and semi periphery, and focuses on their geopolitics. His core claim is to overcome the problems of US imperialism - nothing but the expansion of capital=state=nation - by the principle of the Chinese Empire. The principle of the Chinese Empire means a system ruling a number of nations or countries by ‘exchange’ of obedience and protection. In the history of ideas, this principle of the Chinese Empire was built as a Chinese imperial ruling ideology by Dongzhongshu(董仲舒)s world thought(天下思想). He hopes that the principle of the traditional Empire could be reconstructed in the current People’s Republic of China. He presents the economic development and the socialist equality as two conditions of the reconstruction. Therefore, this article criticizes his theory at some point below. The principle of the traditional Empire is too ideally interpreted. Realizing the principle of the traditional Empire in the current People’s Republic of China is bound to have a various forms of internal and external constraints. Loss of tension between the legitimacy of imperial domination and the nation-state principle is leaded to the weakening of the external persuasiveness. Empire theory of Karatani could not see the above problem correctly because his argument is on such a lineage of Japanese intellectuals’ recognizing China that is still trapped in the theory of overcoming modernity of the 20th century. Finally, this paper points out that there is a serious logical breakdown between Karatani’s ambitious initiative of the ‘World Republic’ and the principles of Empire presented in his The structure of Empire.

목차

1. 무엇이 중국의 자기인식을 방해하는가
2. 『제국의 구조』와 이상화된 중화제국의 원리?
3. 중화인민공화국과 ‘선한 제국’의 원리
4. 지배의 정당성과 ‘근대적’ 가치의 긴장
5. 근대 극복론에 포획된 제국론
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-905-000983307