지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this thesis, I will attempt to analyse the recognition and the response of Korean and Japanese intellectuals about Japan’s protectorate over Korea by the second Korean-Japanese Agreement on November 17th, 1905. I use articles, which were written between 1904 and 1907 on Revue Diplomatique, which had been published in Japan, and Hwangseong Sinmun and The Daehanmaeil Sinbo, in Korea. I will be concerned with two points；one is the difference and correlationship of argument about Japan’s policy on Korea between Korean and Japanese intellectuals as the spatial factor, the other is the process of changing argument according to changing circumferential condition as the time.
In comparison between articles in Japan and Korea, there were variable phases in the Korean situation and prospect of protecting Korea hereafter because discussion about Japan’s protectorate over Korea among Japanese intellectuals was carried on under the East Asia international situation. Though Korean intellectuals seemed to be understood the Japanese argument without the dramatic gap, it would be known that the Japanese argument had been accepted by them in great variable view critically when we go into the details of it.
Japanese scholars of the day grasped that Japan’s policy toward protectorate over Korea started to be carried out after the conclusion of the Korean-Japanese Protocol on February 23th, 1904. Korean intellectuals, on the other hands, gave important political meaning to the third provision“ Japanese government have to certainly grant the independent and the territorial integrity of Korea”on that protocol. They, for example, took notice of Ariga Nagao’s theory, who was a representative legal scholar of the that hour；he insisted that the relation between a protected state and a sovereign state could be altered by the rapidly changing international situation, therefore, they accepted his idea and emphasized that the change of Korea’s international status, from a protected state to a sovereign state, would depend on a result of Korea’s internal reformation.
In addition, according to the difference from a course of accepting foreign news, there was discriminative recognition between Hwangseong Sinmun and The Daehanmaeil Sinbo. The former had stressed the reformation of Korea in the protectorate system, the latter, on the other hand, had assumed a critical attitude toward the protectorate system, though they had held an optimistic view of the British international policy including the second Anglo-Japanese Alliance on August 12th, 1905.
In comparison between articles in Japan and Korea, there were variable phases in the Korean situation and prospect of protecting Korea hereafter because discussion about Japan’s protectorate over Korea among Japanese intellectuals was carried on under the East Asia international situation. Though Korean intellectuals seemed to be understood the Japanese argument without the dramatic gap, it would be known that the Japanese argument had been accepted by them in great variable view critically when we go into the details of it.
Japanese scholars of the day grasped that Japan’s policy toward protectorate over Korea started to be carried out after the conclusion of the Korean-Japanese Protocol on February 23th, 1904. Korean intellectuals, on the other hands, gave important political meaning to the third provision“ Japanese government have to certainly grant the independent and the territorial integrity of Korea”on that protocol. They, for example, took notice of Ariga Nagao’s theory, who was a representative legal scholar of the that hour；he insisted that the relation between a protected state and a sovereign state could be altered by the rapidly changing international situation, therefore, they accepted his idea and emphasized that the change of Korea’s international status, from a protected state to a sovereign state, would depend on a result of Korea’s internal reformation.
In addition, according to the difference from a course of accepting foreign news, there was discriminative recognition between Hwangseong Sinmun and The Daehanmaeil Sinbo. The former had stressed the reformation of Korea in the protectorate system, the latter, on the other hand, had assumed a critical attitude toward the protectorate system, though they had held an optimistic view of the British international policy including the second Anglo-Japanese Alliance on August 12th, 1905.
목차
I. 머리말-왜 ‘보호국론’을 비교하는가?
II. 한국과 일본 ‘보호국론’의 기원과 변천(1894~1904)
III. ‘ 보호조약’ 체결과 보호국 인식의 변화(1905~1907)
IV. 맺음말-‘보호’에서 ‘독립’으로의 기대
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
을사조약 이후 일본의 ‘보호국’ 인식
역사와현실
2007 .12
-
Japanese Studies in Korea
Korea Journal
1965 .06
-
을사늑약을 전후한 영국의 대한정책
한국사학보
2008 .02
-
일제 강제병합 이데올로기와 식민지교육정책
한국독립운동사연구
2011 .08
-
통감정치와 재한 일본인
역사교육
2004 .06
-
Korean-Japanese Relations, 1894-1904(Ⅱ)
Korea Journal
1981 .03
-
Korean - Japanese Relations, 1894-1904 (Ⅰ)
Korea Journal
1981 .02
-
제2차 헤이그 평화회의(1907)와 대한제국 언론의 세계인식 : 『皇城新聞』과 『大韓每日申報』를 중심으로
한국사학보
2008 .02
-
韓国大学生が関心を持つ日本の「文化」
日本語敎育
2019 .01
-
Study of Japanese History in Korea
Korea Journal
1985 .12
-
주변열강의 한반도 문제 협의와 을사조약
역사학보
2006 .12
-
일본문학의 한국어번역에 관한 통사적 고찰
아시아문화연구
2007 .05
-
러일협약과 일본의 한국병합
역사학보
2004 .12
-
韓國 開化期 日本語 文法用語 硏究
日本學硏究
2007 .01
-
김달수의 단편소설에 나타난 민족주의 고찰 : 『사간동 57번지』와『참외와 황제』를 중심으로
일어일문학
2017 .05
-
日本語 対外 普及論理의 考察 : 日帝下 韓에 대한 경우를 中心으로
일본문화학보
2002 .02
-
냉전기 일본 진보파 지식인의 한국 인식 : 『세카이』의 북송·한일회담 보도를 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2011 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-910-002364025