지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Marine accidents have influence over a seafarer’s life, the property on the ship and cargo, as well as the environment at sea. According to the analysis of marine accident, most accidents usually happened as a result of human error, in the form of negligence, improper maneuvering of the ship, violating international regulations for preventing marine accidents.
As result, many countries adopted the ISM Code for preventing marine accidents and enforcement of the ship’s safety management. The Korean government also legislated a maritime safety law for systematic safety management on Korean flag ships, and ship owners can now outsource their ship’s safety management, to a safety management company, under this law. However, there are many small companies without professionalism because it’s easy to enroll a safety management company abiding by only this basic requirement. As a result, requests for improvement of business expertise are increasing through the objective evaluation system, in the safety management market.
Therefore, in this paper, we defined evaluation items for safety management companies through brainstorming with expert group, and then we carried out a survey to two groups (evaluator group, examinee group), and identified the weights of importance determinants in evaluation, using AHP. We also carried out statistical tests to determine the perception gap of weights between the evaluator group and the examinee group. The weights for evaluation of the ship’s safety management company had been identified, and there are differences of weight between the two groups, We learned that the evaluator group considered the staff’s safety education, education & training system and safety quality improvement rate, to be more important. On the other hand, in the examinee group, customer satisfaction and system management results, such as ISO 9001, OHSAS 18001, are treated more importantly than others. In conclusion, we can put the evaluation items and the importance to practical evaluation of safety management ability under responsibilities of the safety management company.
As result, many countries adopted the ISM Code for preventing marine accidents and enforcement of the ship’s safety management. The Korean government also legislated a maritime safety law for systematic safety management on Korean flag ships, and ship owners can now outsource their ship’s safety management, to a safety management company, under this law. However, there are many small companies without professionalism because it’s easy to enroll a safety management company abiding by only this basic requirement. As a result, requests for improvement of business expertise are increasing through the objective evaluation system, in the safety management market.
Therefore, in this paper, we defined evaluation items for safety management companies through brainstorming with expert group, and then we carried out a survey to two groups (evaluator group, examinee group), and identified the weights of importance determinants in evaluation, using AHP. We also carried out statistical tests to determine the perception gap of weights between the evaluator group and the examinee group. The weights for evaluation of the ship’s safety management company had been identified, and there are differences of weight between the two groups, We learned that the evaluator group considered the staff’s safety education, education & training system and safety quality improvement rate, to be more important. On the other hand, in the examinee group, customer satisfaction and system management results, such as ISO 9001, OHSAS 18001, are treated more importantly than others. In conclusion, we can put the evaluation items and the importance to practical evaluation of safety management ability under responsibilities of the safety management company.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 선박안전관리대행업체 현황
Ⅲ. AHP 기법에 의한 평가모델 수립
Ⅳ. 분석결과
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (23)
참고문헌 신청
1. [보고서] - 국토해양부 / 2013 / 2013년 해사안전시행계획
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김영문 / 1996 / 관광지선택에 있어서 AHP의 활용에 관한 연구 / 관광학연구 20 (1) : 63 ~ 81
3. [단행본] - 김충련 / 2012 / SPSS데이터분석 / 21세기사
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김태완 / 2010 / 계층분석과정(AHP)에 의한 지역농업정책의 우선순위 결정 : 창녕지역을 중심으로 / 한국국제농업개발학회지 22 (1) : 8 ~ 14
5. [학술대회논문] - 김화영 / 2012 / Imitation Strategy를 이용한 해운선사 안전도 평가 전략에 관한 연구 / 해양환경안전학회 추계학술대회 논문집 : 196 ~ 198
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김영문 / 1996 / 관광지선택에 있어서 AHP의 활용에 관한 연구 / 관광학연구 20 (1) : 63 ~ 81
3. [단행본] - 김충련 / 2012 / SPSS데이터분석 / 21세기사
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김태완 / 2010 / 계층분석과정(AHP)에 의한 지역농업정책의 우선순위 결정 : 창녕지역을 중심으로 / 한국국제농업개발학회지 22 (1) : 8 ~ 14
5. [학술대회논문] - 김화영 / 2012 / Imitation Strategy를 이용한 해운선사 안전도 평가 전략에 관한 연구 / 해양환경안전학회 추계학술대회 논문집 : 196 ~ 198
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
사회복지 수퍼비전의 중요성공요인에 대한 델파이 및 AHP분석 : 수퍼바이저·수퍼바이지·학계전문가 관점
최원희
한국사회복지행정학
2010
.09
우리나라 영해기선 관리의 개선방안 연구
김지홍
해양정책연구
2015
.06
우리나라 수출·입 해상물동량 감소에 따른 경제적 파급효과 분석
최정환
,
조윤철
,
고성필
외 1명
해양정책연구
2017
.07
국가연구개발사업의 기술사업화 성공요인 분석 연구 : 해양수산 연구개발사업을 중심으로
최상선
,
오인하
해양정책연구
2017
.07
부산항 컨테이너 환적요인에 관한 실증분석
최건우
,
김은수
,
강임호
외 1명
해양정책연구
2016
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-450-002887573