메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
사공일 (부산외국어대학교)
저널정보
동북아시아문화학회 동북아 문화연구 동북아 문화연구 제38집
발행연도
2014.3
수록면
455 - 475 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Deleuze emphasizes the deterritorialization of language beyond general signification. This deterritorialization is a kind of linguistic stammering which stresses the continuous variation of language. He considers the linguistic stammering as chromatic linguistics that can create a lot of meanings, not a fixed meaning. Also, for Deleuze the elementary unit of language, the statement is the order-word. He insists the function of language is not to be informational and communicational, but to transmit an order-word. That is, language is made not to be believed but to be obeyed, and to compel obedience. In this sense, Deleuze underlines the power relations inherent in language. This can be called the politics of language. And Deleuze insists paradox that denies good senses and common senses. His paradox as singularity resists ordinary signification by moving between sense and nonsense. It opens the possibility of creating various meanings.
Zhuangzi"s language philosophy has three characteristics, which are the limitation and the negativity of language, linguistic paradox. According to Zhuangzi, world and all things always changes and are not fixed beings. But language fastens the changing world and things as only a meaning. So, language cannot express them entirely. That is the limitation of language that he says. Also, he says the negativity of language with constituted mind. His constituted mind leads humans to fill with prejudice and stubbornness, which brings human"s wrong judgements. Thus, language full of constituted mind causes the distortion of values and operates as a kind of power. In spite of the limitation and the negativity, language must be used to express world and things, which is paradoxical situation. His paradox as a door create various possibilities of language. In this sense, chromatic linguistics, the politics of language, and paradox in Deleuze is similar to the limitation of language, the negativity of language, and paradox in Zhuangzi to some degree.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가기
Ⅱ. 언어의 한계성과 반음계주의적 언어학
Ⅲ. 성심과 언어 그리고 언어의 정치학
Ⅳ. 언어의 역설
Ⅴ. 나가기
참고문헌
【논문초록】

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-900-001351995