We have repeatedly heard the phrase, God created the perfect world. And then, there came the fall-the fall of mortality, the fall of body, the fall of matter, and the fall of sexuality(especially, female sexuality). All of creation began to collapse and perish, the eternal beginning of nihilo. From it we confront the bitter knowledge that everything comes from nothing and ends up as nothing. From that moment, humanity plays a divine game, as the imago Dei, at the center of the universe, dominating the so -called "nature." Upon human abundance, we hear the mourning of nature. The desolation of land, the pollution of the air and water, disappearance as well as the deformation of species. But is nature so submissive that it is silently annihilating? Instead, can we think of the vast dimension of nature beyond human power as a divine manifestation that illuminates divine creativity entwined with divine mystery and wisdom? Through the ubiquity of nature`s complex manifestation, can we recognize the divine activity intensely permeating its complex co-evolving process? The traditional doctrine of creation has emphasized divine activity in the God-creation relationship. It tells so much about God-the transcendent, omnipotent, infinite, perfect "Other," standing beyond the creaturely realm of the finite, imperfect, inferior, mutable, and corruptible. This dualistic, hierarchical relationship has been used to constitute other relationships in the paradigm of domination and oppression. Ecofeminist theology pursues, therefore, the radical transformation of our theological discourse of creation concomitant to feminist criticism and ecological awareness, and has challenged dualism, patriarchy, anthropocentrism. In resistance to the separative subject-object relationship, ecofeminist theology argues for an interrelationship between God and creation, between human beings and nature, between males and females, between spirit and matter, etc. The ecofeminist theological argument of interrelationship, however, tends to an earth-centered and life-centered view of nature based on the implication of the organism and the interpretation of roach. Nevertheless, creation as a whole reflects to all things in the universe, organic and inorganic in which divine love is manifested, Moreover, are the organic and inorganic worlds really separable in natures dynamic complexity? Upon these questions, I propose the cosmocentric view of creation, a principle of which is ecoharmony, characterized by mutual -subjectivity and interrelationality. If we envision creation as the avatar of divine love, the reverence of nature is consequence. If we envision God through nature s dynamic movement, God is a dynamic force within nature` s process. Therefore, the cosmocentric view of creation embraces macrocosm and microcosm, organic as well as inorganic realms. I argue that life-centered theology disregards the extensive complexity of interrelationality beyond life on earth, and in the reinterpretation of Genesis, I suggest to recognize the dynamic harmony of tehom and roach that symbolizes the cosmic movement. The significance of the cosmocentric view of creation is that it seeks a different understanding of relationships in decentering theocentrism and anthropocentrism/androcentrism. Nature does not manifest a separative relationship between subject and object, but rather, illustrates a mutual - subjectivity and interrelationality of all things, since nature`s fecundity is based on its dynamic complexity and its inexplicable unity within itself. Each relationship is complexly intertwined with other relationships through integration and concrescence, as well as through friction and separation, therefore, ecoharmony connotes the dynamic interrelationality of diversity and unity and its transforming flux. The relationship itself is a movement attuning with nature`s dynamic stream, which is ceaselessly continues to the open possibility. In this dynamic flux, nothing can be