메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기독교학회 한국기독교신학논총 한국기독교신학논총 제32집
발행연도
2004.1
수록면
151 - 176 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
As a way of being co-creators of Earth, this paper will reconstruct the classical Christian understanding of human self-transcendence and sin from an ecological perspective. Christian Theology has defined sin as rebellion against God which stems from the failure of self-transcendence in humanity as spiritual beings. This is defined as the prime sin, stressing the human capacity for vertical self-transcendence in the human spirit. This paper claims that this classical Christian view tends to exacerbate and accelerate our ecological problems and then attempts to establish a theological foundation on which we can primarily confess our prime sin as unnecessary violence against creation. For this theological project, this article first reviews Reinhold Niebuhr`s theological anthropology focusing on the following questions: How does Niebuhr explain the dynamic relations between human self-transcendence in spirit and human finitude in nature, based on the psychological structure of human existence? How does he locate the root of sin in human existential anxiety, which is derived from the ambiguous nature of existence? How does the sin of pride come into existence through the path of spirit and the sin of sensuality through the path of nature? And how does he see the sin of sensuality as an extension of the sin of pride and then subordinates the former into the latter? Why does he subordinate nature to spirit and the sin of sensuality to the sin of pride and then defines pride as the prime sin? The metaphysical reason why Niebuhr subordinates nature to spirit is to emphasize rebellion against God as the prime sin by recognizing that self-transcendence is only possible in spirit and Gcd as the absolute transcendent spirit, is only the source of value, meaning and norms of life. Based on the process philosophy of Marjorie Suchocki, who penetrated into the metaphysical reason for Niehur`s subordination of nature to spirit, this paper tries to find the possibility of a form of transcendence in nature. If each existence transcends other existences through its own uniqueness in the network of ontological interdependence of all forms of life, then this ecological meaning of sin with its horizontal and relative transcendence in nature can provide us with the possibility of meaning, value and norms for life in the world. This paper also examines how horizontal transcendence comes into existence in nature. How does Suchocki locate sin in the failure of self-transcendence in the network of interdependence in nature? This failure of self-transcendence in nature results in the destruction of creation. Then we can lay a theological base on which we begin to define rebellion or violence against creation as the prime sin and directly hold us accountable for the detenomtion of nature.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0