지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The primary tool for spreading the Christian gospel is Bible translation. John Ross and Seo, Sang Ryun translated Luke`s gospel in the April of 1878, and the Korean Church is celebrating a centennial anniversary of the completion of Korean Bible translation. About 69 billion people speaking 6,900 languages are living in the world, and each language has its own symbolic systems, structures and meanings. The UBS reports that all or part of the Bible have been translated in 2,508 languages in 2009. But the Bible has not yet been translated into 2,252 languages that about 353 million people speak, and this shows that the Bible translation is a crucial task in the Christian mission. However, the Bible translation process is complicated. Roman Jakobson suggests three types of translation: intra-lingual, inter-lingual, and inter-semiotic translation. A general understanding of translation of this kind may be adopted to the Bible translation for mission. What is more important, however, is the matter of Bible translation in the mission for those with different cultures. The Bible translation into a language of different cultural background should seriously consider what type of translation theory to be applied. Taking the example of Korean Bible translation, Underwood insisted to translate God into "Chun-Ju" while James S. Gale and Samuel A. Moffett into "Ha-Na-Nim." The Korean Bible translators should consider the question of honorific address, denigrating expressions, dialects and spacing etc. The Bible translation theory is not limited to the three types between the source language and the target language, but includes many other translation theories. The Bible translation from a missiological perspective should consider the questions of how much the translation is reflecting the other culture, if the meaning of the message is effectively delivered, and if it can make the religious experience happen. This article introduces the translation theories of Eugene A. Nida and P. Hiebert, and discusses the function of footnotes for the double translation. Based upon this translation theory, it examines the problem of the current Korean Bible translation from a missiological perspective, and suggests the missiological tasks to make a better Korean Bible translation.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (26)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 곽성희 / 2009 / 현대 번역학의 변화와 발전에 대한 고찰 / 성경원문연구 (24) : 157 ~ 179
2. [단행본] - 김상근 / 2006 / 선교학의 구성 요건과 인접학문 / 연세대학교 출판부
3. [단행본] - 김욱동 / 2010 / 번역과 한국의 근대 / 소명출판
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김재성 / 2009 / 공관서 병행 본문 번역에서 형식 일치와 내용 동등성의 조화 -『표준새번역』과 『새번역』을 중심으로 / 성경원문연구 (24) : 72 ~ 92
5. [단행본] - 나이다 / 1991 / 번역의 이론과 실제, In 도올논문집 / 통나무
2. [단행본] - 김상근 / 2006 / 선교학의 구성 요건과 인접학문 / 연세대학교 출판부
3. [단행본] - 김욱동 / 2010 / 번역과 한국의 근대 / 소명출판
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김재성 / 2009 / 공관서 병행 본문 번역에서 형식 일치와 내용 동등성의 조화 -『표준새번역』과 『새번역』을 중심으로 / 성경원문연구 (24) : 72 ~ 92
5. [단행본] - 나이다 / 1991 / 번역의 이론과 실제, In 도올논문집 / 통나무
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0