메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
장장식 (국립민속박물관)
저널정보
국립민속박물관 민속학연구 민속학연구 제30호
발행연도
2012.6
수록면
117 - 139 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
What is history and what is folklore? What is the difference between history and folklore? Although immature, answers to these questions can be made as followings History is to study history, and folklore is to study folk Common factors in both of the fields are "human" and "culture " Who are human entities and how they conducted their culture, the fact that both consider these two proves that they are among liberal arts and humanities studies in common.
However, discriminative separations between the two fields has consistently existed One originates from concepts of written history and unwritten history Although the concept can be understood in a relative context, it has been taking a role as an authoritative standard distinguishing one from the other.
Objectives of study in folklore and history can largely be classified into two categories which are historical materials and folk materials, and a stereotype that prioritize historical materials to folk materials implying that the former conforms more to "the fact " Will that be really true? Reconsidering on the general thought to believe that facts are reflected on historical materials, cognitive understanding of folk-related facts and folk materials Folk materials indeed are oral sources collected after being corroboratively evidenced on the field Therefore, those are the materials of "now and here," produced, conducted and acknowledged "corroboratively "
History and folklore can also be distinctive from each other through the concepts of recorded history and remembered history However, to record or to remember are put on a stage to be chosen as format Priority of recording to remembering something has been asserted, but it does not determine any value of format itself Remembered materials in folklore is as important as recorded materials in history Especially, memory is emphasized in folklore for its influence in contemporary lives and strengthening of the contemporaries through its modernized form.
Revelation of such like discriminative recognition is for the fact that the perspective of history toward folklore is not positively constructed, and bigotry developed widespread throughout methods and subjects of the research Preliminary objective of studying history and folklore is in purpose of cultural investigation, and in the center of the culture is humankind, which leads the ultimate goal of the studies to understanding of humankind It comes to be of very important standard when discussing consilience between history and folklore Conclusively folklore should complement history, and history should do so for folklore This will conform to Confusion concept "Hwayibudong(和而不)" which means to get along well with others but with kin caress not to make a false step as well as a concept "Jultakdongsi(?啄時)", a main subject of dialogues in Zen Buddhism, meaning a hen helps hatching of a chick through poking an eggshell to accomplish a new birth of life.

목차

1. 역사학과 민속학의 통섭적 관계
2. 쓰인 역사와 쓰이지 않은 역사의 상대성
3. 사료와 민속자료의 경계
4. 기록의 역사, 기억의 역사
5. 메타 역사로서의 민속학과 메타 민속으로서의 역사학
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (36)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-380-001510405