지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This thesis explores the views of Japanese modern intellectuals toward others during the period of Imperialistic competition based on the texts of Soseki’s 「Journey to Manchuria and Korea」 and Akutagawa’s 「China Trip」. An additional attention was paid to the fact that their views had a thread of connection with the discourse of orientalism that the West applied to the colonization of Africa and Asia. Narrative attitudes exhibited in the travel journals reveal that Soseki maintained consistent leisureliness of ‘saseibun’ attitude, looking away from the realities of colonies, while Akutagawa at least passively participated in the realities of China connected with international situations of the time.
It can be seen as their limitation that the two writers stayed in the perception of ‘the others’ and did not have lucid historical awareness. The two travel journals stood out in the narrative that China is a filthy, ignorant and grotesque place with natural beauty and exotic atmosphere while at the same time they emphasize the modernity of Japan. The more emphasized Japan’s modernity is, the more obvious China’s savagery becomes. Like the Oriental image from Europeans’ perspective as Edward Said pointed out, Japanese intellectuals provided foundation and rationale to fortify the domination-subordination relationship by looking at China and Korea as ignorant places.
Edward Said exposed ‘Orientalism’ as a view of the West toward the East. ‘Orientalism’ is a criticism on Western view of the East. It aroused the awareness that Orientalism is the way to relate with the Orient, or the East, not the essence of the East.
Orientalism is characterized by backwardness, sensuality and passivity as European image to be aware of the different culture of the East that lies far afield. And this image symbolized the ‘discourse’ to establish the superiority of the West and seek cause of domination over the East. This Western attitude and Japan’s relationship with China and Korea have in a lot common.
It can be seen as their limitation that the two writers stayed in the perception of ‘the others’ and did not have lucid historical awareness. The two travel journals stood out in the narrative that China is a filthy, ignorant and grotesque place with natural beauty and exotic atmosphere while at the same time they emphasize the modernity of Japan. The more emphasized Japan’s modernity is, the more obvious China’s savagery becomes. Like the Oriental image from Europeans’ perspective as Edward Said pointed out, Japanese intellectuals provided foundation and rationale to fortify the domination-subordination relationship by looking at China and Korea as ignorant places.
Edward Said exposed ‘Orientalism’ as a view of the West toward the East. ‘Orientalism’ is a criticism on Western view of the East. It aroused the awareness that Orientalism is the way to relate with the Orient, or the East, not the essence of the East.
Orientalism is characterized by backwardness, sensuality and passivity as European image to be aware of the different culture of the East that lies far afield. And this image symbolized the ‘discourse’ to establish the superiority of the West and seek cause of domination over the East. This Western attitude and Japan’s relationship with China and Korea have in a lot common.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 소세키의 『만한여행』
3. 아쿠타가와의『중국기행』
4. 맺음말-오리엔탈리즘의 언설
参考文献
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
아쿠타가와 류노스케(芥川龍之介)의 『중국기행(支那游記)』고찰 - 시대인식과 오리엔탈리즘을 중심으로 -
김난희
일어일문학
2005
.08
모더니즘, 新感覺派, 现代主义 : 동아시아의 `modernism" 문학 개념에 대한 일 고찰
김미지
한국현대문학연구
2015
.12
소년사상의 형성과 『소년』소재 기행문의 시대의식
김경남
우리말글
2015
.09
탈식민지 문학자의 소련기행과 새 국가 건설 : 1946년 조선 문학자의 소련기행을 중심으로
배개화
한국현대문학연구
2015
.08
요코미츠 리이치(橫光利一)와 소화(昭和)문학사
金龍紀
국제언어문학
2002
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-830-001999983