지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper contemplates implications of the novel Le Peste and Your Heaven seeing MERS affairs, which recently battered Korean society, in terms of Eco-humanities. Notwithstanding the development of scientific technology of civilization, everybody has experienced anxiety that they can be exposed to the threat of new kind epidemic and various viruses. These ecological risks become the task that should be controlled and prevented by everybody not just by a specific group or a region.
From this point, citizens’ attitudes of Le Peste show original form of Governance that our society has to seek as a social risk management strategy. They recognized “pest” not a personal problem but their own problem, organizing health organization units, and did their best to perform a role of independent citizen. Rather than reliance on government officers, they show the possibility of voluntary Governance from below to settle the problem.
On the other hand, the novel Your Heaven shows lethargic individual’s attitude on the community’s problem. Director Cho, Bak-Heon intention to reform Sorokdo Island was good, but it was executed unilaterally failing to induce residents’ consents and agreements. Thus, passive attitudes of residents of Sorokdo Isaland, not expressing their opinions well, just ended up as your heaven (not our heaven).
In conclusion, the thing we can find from two texts is that better society lies in citizens’ power not in relying on a heroic leader or a government. In critical situations, for the public interests, Governance establishment that based on citizens’ conscious participation and members’ mutual trust with cooperation can show promising perspective of our society. By actively expressing and voluntarily participating on the community issue, if we expand the role of citizen-centric Governance, it will cause a little confusion no matter whether second MERS affairs occur in the future. Especially like the civil experience of the city of Oran’s conquest against the pest, showed in the novel Le Peste, if the value of voluntary solidarity is harmonized, crisis situations that our society currently face can be easily settled down.
From this point, citizens’ attitudes of Le Peste show original form of Governance that our society has to seek as a social risk management strategy. They recognized “pest” not a personal problem but their own problem, organizing health organization units, and did their best to perform a role of independent citizen. Rather than reliance on government officers, they show the possibility of voluntary Governance from below to settle the problem.
On the other hand, the novel Your Heaven shows lethargic individual’s attitude on the community’s problem. Director Cho, Bak-Heon intention to reform Sorokdo Island was good, but it was executed unilaterally failing to induce residents’ consents and agreements. Thus, passive attitudes of residents of Sorokdo Isaland, not expressing their opinions well, just ended up as your heaven (not our heaven).
In conclusion, the thing we can find from two texts is that better society lies in citizens’ power not in relying on a heroic leader or a government. In critical situations, for the public interests, Governance establishment that based on citizens’ conscious participation and members’ mutual trust with cooperation can show promising perspective of our society. By actively expressing and voluntarily participating on the community issue, if we expand the role of citizen-centric Governance, it will cause a little confusion no matter whether second MERS affairs occur in the future. Especially like the civil experience of the city of Oran’s conquest against the pest, showed in the novel Le Peste, if the value of voluntary solidarity is harmonized, crisis situations that our society currently face can be easily settled down.
목차
1. 서론
2. 이론적 배경 - 인문학적 위기관리전략
3. 소설 속 위기상황에 대한 대처방식 비교
4. 메르스 사태에 주는 시사점 - ‘거버넌스’ 구축을 통한 문제해결 노력
5. 결론
〈인용문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
세계화 시대, 신종감염병의 습격과 대응 -메르스를 중심으로-
이화사학연구
2022 .06
-
<메르스>에 대한 은유와 이데올로기적 함축 : KBS와 JTBC 뉴스 보도를 중심으로
한국어학
2016 .08
-
카뮈의 페스트와 이오네스코의 대학살 놀이에 나타난 전염병과 크로노토프의 전복적 관계 연구
인문언어
2020 .01
-
‘코로나’시대의 『페스트』 읽기를 통한 생태 문해력의 확장과 인문학의 의무
통일인문학
2021 .03
-
시대적 사명과 인문학의 역할
동아인문학
2021 .03
-
‘러’의 의미와 용법
언어와 정보사회
2021 .01
-
COVID-19 위기 거버넌스에 대한 시스템 접근
윤리연구
2021 .09
-
현대중국어 ‘V了O了’문형의 의미해석 및 담화-화용 기능
담화와인지
2019 .05
-
The Historical Context of Social Governance Experiments in East Asia : The Challenges of Risk Society
Korea Journal
2018 .03
-
현대중국어정도보어‘A/V+極+(了)’와‘了’에관한고찰
중국어문학논집
2022 .08
-
인문학의 성과 확산, 어떻게 할 것인가
국어문학
2016 .11
-
정책PR의 관점에서 본 위기관리 커뮤니케이션에 대한 연구: 서울시의 메르스 대응 과정을 중심으로
사회과학연구
2016 .01
-
인문학의 대중화 방안 -아산시 지역을 대상으로
순천향 인문과학논총
2017 .12
-
Co-governance and the Environmental Movement
Korea Journal
2021 .12
-
천국에 가고 싶으세요?
월간에세이
2022 .11
-
천국에서 만나요
창비어린이
2022 .03
-
다시 다이내믹한 삶으로 — 차지윤 수필집《시시한 시간 속에서》(페스트북, 2024)
수필미학
2024 .09
-
농촌에서 진행한 인문학 프로그램의 효용성에 대한 고찰
인문논총
2021 .08
-
메르스 사태가 남긴 과제
역사비평
2015 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-810-002187954