지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 중국어문학연구회 중국어문학논집 中國語文學論集 第135號
- 발행연도
- 2022.8
- 수록면
- 63 - 86 (24page)
- DOI
- 10.25021/JCLL.2022.8.135.63
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper analyzed the semantic functional characteristics of "A/V+Ji+(Le)" focusing on the role of "Le" in "A/V+Ji+(Le)", which has not been discussed much in previous studies. The results can be summarized as follows:
First, in order to understand the relationship between "A/V+Ji+(Le)" and "Le", based on the corpus, the distribution difference according to the syntactic position of the degree adverb "Ji", the collocation relations and semantic characteristics were examined. As a result, it suggests that the addition of "Le" in "A/V+Ji+(Le)" can be seen as voluntary. Next, when "Ji" is used as an adverb or complement, there is a clear difference in the verb/adjective that is combined.
Second, in order to analyze the relationship between the correct complement structure "A/V+Ji+(Le)" and "Le", the usage of "Ji" and the resulting diachronic formation process of "A/V+Ji+(Le)" were investigated. The degree adverb "Ji" has undergone a process of transformation of syntactic and semantic functions from the original noun to a verb and from a verb to an adverb. At this time, the subjectification of "Ji" played an important role in the diachronic formation of "A/V+Ji+(Le)". In this process, "Ji" undergoes one more important change with the advent of the sentence-final particle "Le". Before early modern times, "A/V+Ji" without "Le" was the mainstream, but in early modern times "A/V+Ji+Le" has become the mainstream form. Semantically, the emergence of the sentence-final particle "Le", accelerates the subjectification of "Ji". That is, "A/V+Ji" and "A/V+Ji+Le" have different meanings. The former shows the meaning of the degree of the predicate, but the latter loses the meaning of the degree and plays a role in emphasizing only the speaker"s cognitive judgment of the predicate proposition.
Finally, the meaning and role of "Le" in the "A/V+Ji+(Le)" structure were discussed. In the corpus analysis, it could be confirmed that there were a lot of adjectives/verbs expressing emotions such as "高興, 難受, 難過, 可怕, 害怕, 痛苦, 興奮, 有趣" in "A/V+Ji+Le" compared to "A/V+Ji" or "Ji+A/V". This can be said because adding "Le4" is suitable for emphasizing express the speaker"s subjective emotional and cognitive state. As such, the "Le" of "A/V+Ji+(Le)" is a modal marker "Le4" and is used to express the speaker"s subjective opinion and belief, It can be said that it is used in various ways to emphasize and exaggerate the attitude of the speaker in combination with degree complement "Ji". which represents maximum amount/large amount. Therefore, syntactic and semantic differences between "A/V+Ji" and "A/V+Ji+Le" also occur depending on whether the modal marker "Le4" is involved.
First, in order to understand the relationship between "A/V+Ji+(Le)" and "Le", based on the corpus, the distribution difference according to the syntactic position of the degree adverb "Ji", the collocation relations and semantic characteristics were examined. As a result, it suggests that the addition of "Le" in "A/V+Ji+(Le)" can be seen as voluntary. Next, when "Ji" is used as an adverb or complement, there is a clear difference in the verb/adjective that is combined.
Second, in order to analyze the relationship between the correct complement structure "A/V+Ji+(Le)" and "Le", the usage of "Ji" and the resulting diachronic formation process of "A/V+Ji+(Le)" were investigated. The degree adverb "Ji" has undergone a process of transformation of syntactic and semantic functions from the original noun to a verb and from a verb to an adverb. At this time, the subjectification of "Ji" played an important role in the diachronic formation of "A/V+Ji+(Le)". In this process, "Ji" undergoes one more important change with the advent of the sentence-final particle "Le". Before early modern times, "A/V+Ji" without "Le" was the mainstream, but in early modern times "A/V+Ji+Le" has become the mainstream form. Semantically, the emergence of the sentence-final particle "Le", accelerates the subjectification of "Ji". That is, "A/V+Ji" and "A/V+Ji+Le" have different meanings. The former shows the meaning of the degree of the predicate, but the latter loses the meaning of the degree and plays a role in emphasizing only the speaker"s cognitive judgment of the predicate proposition.
Finally, the meaning and role of "Le" in the "A/V+Ji+(Le)" structure were discussed. In the corpus analysis, it could be confirmed that there were a lot of adjectives/verbs expressing emotions such as "高興, 難受, 難過, 可怕, 害怕, 痛苦, 興奮, 有趣" in "A/V+Ji+Le" compared to "A/V+Ji" or "Ji+A/V". This can be said because adding "Le4" is suitable for emphasizing express the speaker"s subjective emotional and cognitive state. As such, the "Le" of "A/V+Ji+(Le)" is a modal marker "Le4" and is used to express the speaker"s subjective opinion and belief, It can be said that it is used in various ways to emphasize and exaggerate the attitude of the speaker in combination with degree complement "Ji". which represents maximum amount/large amount. Therefore, syntactic and semantic differences between "A/V+Ji" and "A/V+Ji+Le" also occur depending on whether the modal marker "Le4" is involved.
목차
1. 서론
2. 정도부사 ‘極’의 통사적 위치에 따른 의미 기능 차이
3. ‘極’의 어법화와 ‘A/V+極+(了)’의 형성
4. ‘A/V+極+(了)’와 양태 표지 ‘了₄’
5. 결론
參考文獻
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
‘別+V+了+O’ 구문과 ‘別+V+O+了’ 구문의 오류 분석 및 교육 방안 연구
중국어문학논집
2016 .08
-
중국어 방언의 완정상․완료상․완성상 표지의 분포와 그의 언어유형론적 함의
중국언어연구
2020 .01
-
담화화용 층위에서의 ‘了’자구 대조연구
중어중문학
2024 .12
-
경험상 표지 ‘過’와 문미 조사 ‘了₂’의 완료 용법 대조분석
중국어문학논집
2015 .04
-
“V+过1+了2”的语用分析
중국학논총
2021 .09
-
문말조사 ‘了’의 행위양태의미 연구
동아인문학
2020 .12
-
现代汉语话语标记“行了”
중국언어연구
2017 .06
-
현대중국어 ‘V了O了’문형의 의미해석 및 담화-화용 기능
담화와인지
2019 .05
-
현대중국어 ‘太+A(了)’ 형식의 통사적 분포 및 ‘了’의 생략 제약 고찰
중국언어연구
2024 .06
-
标记“了”的认知解析考察
중국학논총
2017 .01
-
"动词+了1+时量词+名词+了2" 문형에 관한 소고 ―중국어와 영어 대조를 통하여
중국학논총
2024 .03
-
한국인 학습자의 중간언어 분석을 통한 중국어 조사 ‘了’의 교육 순서 연구
중국문학
2015 .01
-
論粵語句末助詞 「嚟」 的用法及其虛化過程
중국어문학논집
2016 .12
-
완료상표지 ‘-었-’과 ‘了’의 문법의미
중국언어연구
2020 .01
-
‘V起来了’와 ‘V了起来’의 대조 연구— 문법화이론을 중심으로
중국어문논총
2018 .01
-
Semantic-Pragmatic Development of the Spatial Noun The ‘ground’: From a Grammaticalization Perspective
언어와언어학
2016 .01
-
‘러’의 의미와 용법
언어와 정보사회
2021 .01
-
문말조사 ‘了’, ‘的’ 연구 -공시(共时)문법화를 중심으로
언어과학
2019 .01
-
현대중국어 ‘V+C t’ 구조의 지속 의미 연구
중국어문학논집
2015 .10
-
중국어 용언성 성분의 시간참조 및 그 통사 효과
중국어문논역총간
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-820-001702758