지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study investigates the effects of discourse-related factors on the English dative alternation in Korean L2 learners’ writing by comparing a learner corpus (YELC) and a corresponding native speaker corpus (LOCNESS). Factors of interest are pronominality, definiteness and linear length of the two post-verbal arguments of the dative construction, which have been shown in previous studies to affect the choice between alternative double object and prepositional constructions. The results suggest (i) that Korean learners generally prefer the prepositional construction over the double object construction as compared with native speakers and (ii) that constraints involving pronominality are acquired earlier or more easily than those involving definiteness or length. These findings are discussed in terms of the role of instruction and L1 transfer in L2 acquisition of the English dative construction.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Methods
3. Results and Discussions
4. General Discussion and Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (37)
참고문헌 신청
Abbott, Barbara. 2002. Definiteness and indefiniteness. Handbook of Pragmatics, eds. by L. Horn & G. Ward, 122-149. Oxford: Blackwell.
Anthony, Laurence. 2014. AntConc (Version 3.4.3) [Computer Software] Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from http://www.laurenceanthony.net/
Arnold, Jennifer. E., Thomas Wasow, Anthony Losongco, and Ryan Ginstrom. 2000. Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language 76, 28-55.
Birner, Betty J. and Gregory Ward. 2009. Information structure and syntactic structure. Language and Linguistics Compass 3:4, 1167-1187.
Bresnan, Joan, Anna Cueni, Tatiana Nikitina, and R. Harald Baayen. 2007. Predicting the dative alternation. Cognitive foundations of interpretation, eds. by G. Bouman, I. Kramer, & J. Zwarts, 69-94. The Netherlands: Edita-the Publishing House of the Royal.
Anthony, Laurence. 2014. AntConc (Version 3.4.3) [Computer Software] Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from http://www.laurenceanthony.net/
Arnold, Jennifer. E., Thomas Wasow, Anthony Losongco, and Ryan Ginstrom. 2000. Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language 76, 28-55.
Birner, Betty J. and Gregory Ward. 2009. Information structure and syntactic structure. Language and Linguistics Compass 3:4, 1167-1187.
Bresnan, Joan, Anna Cueni, Tatiana Nikitina, and R. Harald Baayen. 2007. Predicting the dative alternation. Cognitive foundations of interpretation, eds. by G. Bouman, I. Kramer, & J. Zwarts, 69-94. The Netherlands: Edita-the Publishing House of the Royal.
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Effects of Cross-linguistic Influence on the Use of English Dative Constructions in Second Language Written Production
Corpus Linguistics Research
2020 .01
-
한국인 L2화자의 여격 구문 인식에 관한 연구
새한영어영문학
2015 .08
-
A Study of Dative Alternation in Written and Spoken German Registers Focusing on the Verb ‘Schreiben’
언어와 정보
2024 .08
-
Syntactic Distribution of the Semantic Classes of Dative Verbs in English and Cantonese: A Crosslinguistic Perspective
언어
2021 .06
-
A Lexical Feature-based Analysis for the English Dative Alternation
영어영문학
2019 .11
-
To Give New Objects : The Information Structure Effect on Dative Construction in Mandarin Chinese
담화와인지
2019 .05
-
On the Syntactic Status of English Dative Idioms
영어영문학
2021 .08
-
Variation in Double Object Formation with Dative Verbs: English vs. Korean
영어학
2021 .01
-
An eye-movement study of EFL learners’ English dative sentence processing by proficiency levels
언어과학연구
2024 .12
-
Given-before-New and Theory of Mind in English-Acquiring Children
담화와인지
2021 .02
-
Ditransitive Asymmetries and Quantifier Scope in Korean
언어
2020 .09
-
Korean Dative-Nominative-Predicate Constructions as a Reference Point Phenomenon
담화와인지
2018 .11
-
원어민 코퍼스와의 비교를 통한한국 대학생의 여격동사 구문 활용 특성 분석
영어영문학연구
2015 .01
-
이중목적어구문과 여격구문의 통사구조
새한영어영문학
2015 .11
-
한국어 모어 화자와 학습자의 여격 구문 문장 처리 연구
국어국문학
2023 .12
-
러시아어 ‘위협’의 여격 표지
슬라브학보
2015 .12
-
The Use of Make in a Korean Learner Spoken Corpus
현대영어영문학
2019 .01
-
Function and Accuracy of Lexical Bundle Use in English as L3 Learners" Essay Writings: A Learner Corpus-Based Study
영어영문학
2022 .11
-
Use of English Futures, Will vs. Be Going to: A Corpus-Based Comparison Study
현대문법연구
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
The Two Forms of English Negative Yes/No Question and Practices of Challenging in Conversation
Jiseon Pa
,
k
담화와인지
2013
.08
보조동사 의미의 인지언어학적 분석 : ‘버리다’, ‘치우다’, ‘내다’ 구성을 중심으로
홍달오
담화와인지
2015
.12
Cross-linguistic View on Pain Language between English and Korean
Youn-Jee Huh
담화와인지
2015
.12
A Corpus-Pragmatic Analysis of Wuli
Hye-Kyung Lee
담화와인지
2015
.12
The Meanings of ‘-uy’, the So-called Korean Genitive Case Marker and the Theme-Location Relation
Il Kon Kim
담화와인지
2015
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-701-002661853