지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The main purpose of this paper is to research for locating the landing spots and defensive positions of Baekje while Su Dingfang of Tang Dynasty invaded into the country in AD 660. While Chinese historical sources show that Su Dingfang entered into Baekje through Ungjin Gang Gu or Ungjin Gu which means ‘Ungjin River mouth’, Korean historical sources such as ‘Samguk Sagi’, History of the Three Kingdoms, indicates it was Gibulpo or Baek River. In this case of Su Dingfang’s attack on Baekje, Gibulpo or Baek River in Samguk Sagi was area where Baekje forces tried to defend. On the other hand, Ungjin Gang Gu or Ungjin Gu recorded in Chinese sources was Tang forces’ landing area to attack Baekje. In this context, this paper examines each place reflected by different points of view – the defense and the offense.
The defense carries out terrain analysis(war game) to develop strategy to defend against its enemy, which entails identifying key terrains, and deploying combat forces. Baekje must have done the same tactics in its own time. This study concludes that Baekje forces were sent out to an area around Gaechuk-ri and Ugon-ri, where Geum River and Nonsan Stream met – as stated Baek River or Gibulpo written in the historical source.
The offense also is conducted by terrain analysis(war game) to formulate attack strategy, which involves selecting avenues of approach, landing and assembly area. This study finds that Tang forces cruised along Geum River to enter Baekje. They landed on area around Bongjeong-ri and Seoksung-ri, where Geum River and Seoksung Stream met – indicated as Ungjin Gang Gu or Ungjin Gu according to the historical source – and struck down the opponent from the back. The avenues of approach and landing area were the most efficient path to their assembly point.
To conclude, Baek River or Gibulpo in which Baekje formed a defense line, and Ungjin Gang Gu or Ungjin Gu where Su Dingfang touched down are two different locations. These areas are close to each other, but in fact, Su Dingfang passed Baekje’s disposition, landed on Ungjin Gang Gu or Ungjin Gu, and launched an attack from the back.
Today, locations of Su Dingfang’s avenues of approach and landing areas differ among researchers because most studies overlook the terrain analysis based on military point of view, if not adopt improper research methods. therefore, it is only possible to accurately locate battle fields by conducting military geographical analysis(war game) which takes into account nature of battles.
The defense carries out terrain analysis(war game) to develop strategy to defend against its enemy, which entails identifying key terrains, and deploying combat forces. Baekje must have done the same tactics in its own time. This study concludes that Baekje forces were sent out to an area around Gaechuk-ri and Ugon-ri, where Geum River and Nonsan Stream met – as stated Baek River or Gibulpo written in the historical source.
The offense also is conducted by terrain analysis(war game) to formulate attack strategy, which involves selecting avenues of approach, landing and assembly area. This study finds that Tang forces cruised along Geum River to enter Baekje. They landed on area around Bongjeong-ri and Seoksung-ri, where Geum River and Seoksung Stream met – indicated as Ungjin Gang Gu or Ungjin Gu according to the historical source – and struck down the opponent from the back. The avenues of approach and landing area were the most efficient path to their assembly point.
To conclude, Baek River or Gibulpo in which Baekje formed a defense line, and Ungjin Gang Gu or Ungjin Gu where Su Dingfang touched down are two different locations. These areas are close to each other, but in fact, Su Dingfang passed Baekje’s disposition, landed on Ungjin Gang Gu or Ungjin Gu, and launched an attack from the back.
Today, locations of Su Dingfang’s avenues of approach and landing areas differ among researchers because most studies overlook the terrain analysis based on military point of view, if not adopt improper research methods. therefore, it is only possible to accurately locate battle fields by conducting military geographical analysis(war game) which takes into account nature of battles.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 백강과 기벌포에 대한 종래의 제 학설
3. 군사학적 고찰과 문헌검토
4. 맺음말
〈ABSTRAC〉
참고문헌 (34)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
[COVER STORY] 윤새봄 웅진 대표_다시 일어선 웅진
포브스 코리아
2023 .06
-
중국 웅안신구 건립 어떻게 보아야 하나
월간 KIET 산업경제
2017 .08
-
From Defense to Offense: Australia’s Aim to Secure Its Technological Future
Global Asia
2022 .12
-
쟁의행위의 목적
노동법학
2019 .03
-
대만에 대한 중국의 군사력 사용 가능성에 대한 소고(小考) : 상륙(amphibious landing) 작전 역량을 중심으로
국제학논총
2022 .12
-
아크 상륙의 임팩트
관훈저널
2020 .03
-
조선후기 경강의 냉장선 빙어선(氷魚船) 영업과 그 분쟁
서울학연구
2017 .11
-
노동기본권의 본질과 쟁의행위
法學論文集
2015 .01
-
한국 상륙하는 디즈니+, 게임체인저 될 수 있을까
매경럭스맨
2021 .11
-
결과적 가중범의 중지미수에 관한 새로운 해석론의 전개
인권과 정의
2024 .05
-
한미 연합 상륙 훈련: 쌍룡 2024
월간 플래툰
2024 .09
-
단체행동의 무력화와 해소 방안
민주법학
2018 .01
-
애플페이 한국 상륙 작전
더스쿠프
2023 .03
-
[초점] 아마존 한국 상륙…긴장감 도는 유통가
넥스트 이코노미
2021 .01
-
'춘향전' 전승에서 방자 삽화의 변이 양상과 의미
고전문학과 교육
2018 .01
-
20세기 초의 경계를 넘나드는 다원주의: 대양적 사상사 너머의 모색
정치사상연구
2020 .11
-
서울시 형법범죄 발생에 대한 판별분석
경찰학논총
2017 .01
-
의사의 직업윤리 - 의사의 파업, 그리고 권리와 의무 -
도덕윤리과교육
2023 .05
-
파업은 왜 길어지는가?
산업관계연구
2024 .09
-
[Expert’s Column] 이권홍의 중국, 중국인 | 공자 ❷_성인 공자와 야합 논란
더스쿠프
2019 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-390-002836462