지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article aims to reexamine the meanings of the French Revolution through the analysis of the Lyon Revolt and the cruel massacre by the revolutionary government in May 1793. Was it a reactionary and anti-revolutionary mouvement perpetrated by the bourgeois and the royalists of the French second city when the revolutionary dynamics were being transferred from the bourgeoisie to the sans-culottes? Was it a resistance for saving the liberty from the Parisian Jacobins’ tyranny? Or was it a mouvement for saving the parliamentary ‘law’ from the popular ‘justice’? Who were responsible for the Lyon Revolt and the massacre? Was the Terreur the inevitable measure to save the country from the external and internal wars? Or was it no more than the explosions of the furies and the vengeances?
When the Revolution broke out in 1789, the lyonese bourgeois didn’t want to revolutionize Lyon though they accepted the Parisian revolutionary cause. But as the lyonese Jacobins led by Chalier took the power of the city in late 1792 and took the radical policy of the class antagonism, the lyonese bourgeois revolted and got rid of them in May 1793 with the help of the popular sections who were suffering from the infringement of their traditional autonomy by their former allies. For this reason, the Lyon Revolt can be considered to be an anti-Jacobin mouvement rather than a social class struggle.
It was natural that the Nation Convention couldn’t approve the Lyon Revolt. After the military attack and capture of the city in October 1793, the National Convention ordered that Lyon shouldn’t be existent. While the People’s representative Couthon didn’t follow faithfully the order of the destruction and the massacre, Collot d’Herbois and Fouché, his successors, were faithful. They carried out the order to the letter, which resulted in the cruel execution of about 2,000 citizens.
The Committee of Public Safety’s response was the “Terreur”. It was no other than the illegal violence wielded by the state. It is certain that the Terreur was the inevitable measure to win the internal and external wars. Nevertheless, it is also certain that the Lyon massacre was a frantic social vengeance exceeding a normal state punishment. Though the massacre was carried out by the People’s Representatives, the Committee of Public Safety cannot escape the final responsibility for the savage act.
Those who participated in the revolt supported the French Revolution in 1789. The Lyon Revolt was not the royalist anti-Revolution eager to return to the Ancient Regime. To see it as the anti-Revolution is to follow naively the interpretation in justification of the policy of Terreur of the Jacobins. It cannot be denied that the Lyon Revolt was a civil resistance for saving the liberty, the law, the representative system and the property in opposition to the equality, the people’ justice and the people’s direct democracy dreamed of by the Jacobins and the Sans-culottes.
When the Revolution broke out in 1789, the lyonese bourgeois didn’t want to revolutionize Lyon though they accepted the Parisian revolutionary cause. But as the lyonese Jacobins led by Chalier took the power of the city in late 1792 and took the radical policy of the class antagonism, the lyonese bourgeois revolted and got rid of them in May 1793 with the help of the popular sections who were suffering from the infringement of their traditional autonomy by their former allies. For this reason, the Lyon Revolt can be considered to be an anti-Jacobin mouvement rather than a social class struggle.
It was natural that the Nation Convention couldn’t approve the Lyon Revolt. After the military attack and capture of the city in October 1793, the National Convention ordered that Lyon shouldn’t be existent. While the People’s representative Couthon didn’t follow faithfully the order of the destruction and the massacre, Collot d’Herbois and Fouché, his successors, were faithful. They carried out the order to the letter, which resulted in the cruel execution of about 2,000 citizens.
The Committee of Public Safety’s response was the “Terreur”. It was no other than the illegal violence wielded by the state. It is certain that the Terreur was the inevitable measure to win the internal and external wars. Nevertheless, it is also certain that the Lyon massacre was a frantic social vengeance exceeding a normal state punishment. Though the massacre was carried out by the People’s Representatives, the Committee of Public Safety cannot escape the final responsibility for the savage act.
Those who participated in the revolt supported the French Revolution in 1789. The Lyon Revolt was not the royalist anti-Revolution eager to return to the Ancient Regime. To see it as the anti-Revolution is to follow naively the interpretation in justification of the policy of Terreur of the Jacobins. It cannot be denied that the Lyon Revolt was a civil resistance for saving the liberty, the law, the representative system and the property in opposition to the equality, the people’ justice and the people’s direct democracy dreamed of by the Jacobins and the Sans-culottes.
목차
「국문초록」
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 반(反)자코뱅 반란
Ⅲ. 시민들의 항전
Ⅳ. 혁명정부의 학살
Ⅴ. 맺음말
〈참고문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (29)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
[LYON] This is Lyon
트래비 Travie
2025 .05
-
영국 충성파의 자코뱅주의 - 프랑스혁명기 도덕의 반(反)개혁적 정치화 -
영국 연구
2024 .06
-
벽화를 통한 리옹의 문화적 기억 보존⋅활용 연구
건지인문학
2020 .01
-
1946년 10월 대구·영남 사건의 명명 작업과 그것의 정치성: 사건·사태, 소요·소동, 민요·민란을 중심으로
대구사학
2019 .01
-
프랑스혁명기 공포정치에 내재한 혁명가들의 정치적 지향 : 극중도(l’extrème centre) - 푸셰의 파견의원 임무수행 및 로베스피에르와의 대립을 중심으로
서양사연구
2017 .01
-
Does the Heart Revolt at Evil? The Case of Racial Atrocities
Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
2022 .08
-
한나 아렌트와 프랑스혁명
역사와 담론
2016 .10
-
프랑스혁명과 폭력 : 민중봉기에서 국가폭력으로?
프랑스사 연구
2015 .02
-
프랑스 혁명과 민주주의
역사와 세계
2019 .06
-
‘여순 10.19’ 관련 구술 사업의 현황과 과제
역사학연구
2019 .01
-
제2대와 제4대 국회의 학살사건 처리 비교 연구 : 특별위원회 활동을 중심으로
한국사연구
2019 .03
-
프랑스의 사회통합과 지역발전 문화정책 : Lyon의 〈댄스 비엔날레〉
프랑스어권 문화예술연구
2017 .11
-
미슐레의 공화주의 프랑스혁명사
역사와 담론
2019 .07
-
열월 9일 정변과 공포정치의 청산
프랑스사 연구
2018 .02
-
『이슬람의 반란』에 나타난 여성 해방적 관점
영어영문학연구
2017 .01
-
모세의 시내산 제노사이드의 폭력 메커니즘 연구 ― 출애굽기 32장 소위 ‘황금 송아지’ 사건을 중심으로
신학사상
2024 .06
-
프랑스혁명사의 “전지구적 전환”: 혁명사 연구의 새로운 방향에 대한 사학사적 고찰
서양사연구
2016 .01
-
홉킨즈와 예이츠의 비교연구 : 이원론에 대한 저항
동서비교문학저널
2017 .03
-
세계사 속의 5.18 -피털루, 잘리안왈라공원, 그리고 광주-
역사학연구
2019 .01
-
버크와 페인 - 프랑스혁명에 대한 엇갈린 예언
역사와 담론
2018 .07
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-911-002888538