지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The study on grammaticalization of the equal comparative marker “Xiang(像)” has scarcely been studied in the academic world. This paper considers “Xiang(像)” used in Mandarin in both of the sentence pattern “NP₁+Pre<SUB>像</SUB>+NP₂+W” and “NP₁+Pre<SUB>像</SUB>+NP₂+X+W” as preposition in terms of a theory of grammaticalization. It then investigates the grammaticalization of “Xiang(像)” using a total inspection involved the example sentences in ten documents of the Ming(明) and Qing(清) dynasties and six works of modern writers searched on CCL Corpus. The findings of the research are as follows:
First, the first stage is the appearance of “NP₁+V<SUB>像</SUB>+NP₂”. From the pre-Qin(先秦) period to the Song(宋) dynasty, the sentence pattern “NP₁+V<SUB>像</SUB>+NP₂” appeared in succession, though the verb “Xiang(像)” in this pattern was not grammaticalized directly. Still, it can be considered as a precondition for the occurrence of grammaticalization toward an equal comparative marker “Xiang(像)”, with the advent of a comparative outcome (W) at the second stage, because of the fact that this verb, meaning “similar, alike”, could accompany “standard of similarity” as an object without any help from any function words.
Second, the second stage is the appearance of “NP₁+Pre<SUB>像</SUB>+NP₂+W”. At the beginning of the Ming(明) dynasty, the sentence pattern “NP₁+Pre<SUB>像</SUB>+NP₂+ W” appeared, which is the pattern “NP₁+V<SUB>像</SUB>+NP₂” accompanying the comparative outcome(W). As the adjective or the verb appeared as a comparative outcome(W), the focus of description in the sentence was moved from “Xiang(像)” to the comparative outcome(W). Accordingly, “Xiang(像)” was grammaticalized from the verb meaning “similar” to the equal comparative marker.
Third, the third stage is the appearance of “NP₁+Pre<SUB>像</SUB>+NP₂+X+W”. “Xiang(像)” which began to be grammaticalized due to the movement of the focus of description in the sentence, caused by the advent of the comparative outcome(W), had become more grammaticalized, since the sentence pattern the modifier(X) was added to appeared in the Ming(明) and Qing(清) dynasties. It then seems to have had completely been grammaticalized since late modern period, along with high appearance frequency.
Fourth, although the verb “Xiang(像)” meaning “similar” was already grammaticalized to the equal comparative marker, it still functions as a verb(NP₁+V<SUB>像</SUB>+NP₂)as well as a preposition(NP₁+Pre<SUB>像</SUB>+NP₂+W/NP₁+Pre<SUB>像</SUB>+NP₂+X+W), which represents a layering phenomenon.
First, the first stage is the appearance of “NP₁+V<SUB>像</SUB>+NP₂”. From the pre-Qin(先秦) period to the Song(宋) dynasty, the sentence pattern “NP₁+V<SUB>像</SUB>+NP₂” appeared in succession, though the verb “Xiang(像)” in this pattern was not grammaticalized directly. Still, it can be considered as a precondition for the occurrence of grammaticalization toward an equal comparative marker “Xiang(像)”, with the advent of a comparative outcome (W) at the second stage, because of the fact that this verb, meaning “similar, alike”, could accompany “standard of similarity” as an object without any help from any function words.
Second, the second stage is the appearance of “NP₁+Pre<SUB>像</SUB>+NP₂+W”. At the beginning of the Ming(明) dynasty, the sentence pattern “NP₁+Pre<SUB>像</SUB>+NP₂+ W” appeared, which is the pattern “NP₁+V<SUB>像</SUB>+NP₂” accompanying the comparative outcome(W). As the adjective or the verb appeared as a comparative outcome(W), the focus of description in the sentence was moved from “Xiang(像)” to the comparative outcome(W). Accordingly, “Xiang(像)” was grammaticalized from the verb meaning “similar” to the equal comparative marker.
Third, the third stage is the appearance of “NP₁+Pre<SUB>像</SUB>+NP₂+X+W”. “Xiang(像)” which began to be grammaticalized due to the movement of the focus of description in the sentence, caused by the advent of the comparative outcome(W), had become more grammaticalized, since the sentence pattern the modifier(X) was added to appeared in the Ming(明) and Qing(清) dynasties. It then seems to have had completely been grammaticalized since late modern period, along with high appearance frequency.
Fourth, although the verb “Xiang(像)” meaning “similar” was already grammaticalized to the equal comparative marker, it still functions as a verb(NP₁+V<SUB>像</SUB>+NP₂)as well as a preposition(NP₁+Pre<SUB>像</SUB>+NP₂+W/NP₁+Pre<SUB>像</SUB>+NP₂+X+W), which represents a layering phenomenon.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 유형론적 관점에서 살펴본 ‘유사하다’의미 동사의 문법화
3. ‘像’의 문법화 과정
4. 나오는 말
【參考文獻】
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (84)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
論粵語句末助詞 「嚟」 的用法及其虛化過程
중국어문학논집
2016 .12
-
Semantic-Pragmatic Development of the Spatial Noun The ‘ground’: From a Grammaticalization Perspective
언어와언어학
2016 .01
-
On Polygrammaticalization of the English Verb accord
언어과학연구
2017 .09
-
‘比’ 비교문의 미세 분석모형 구축과 비교 의미역 자동 추출
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2018 .04
-
한국어 상 보조용언 ‘가다’와 ‘오다’의 문법화 연구 : 문법화 정도를 중심으로
담화와인지
2018 .11
-
現代漢語“個”的特殊用法及語法化硏究
중국어문학논집
2017 .10
-
“要”的程度标记用法及其语法化研究 - 以“比”字句中的“要”为例
중어중문학
2024 .09
-
자료 기반 언어 연구의 허상(虛像)과 오류
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2017 .04
-
5-6世紀 中國 造像記 자료 및 연구 성과의 소개와 과제
중국고중세사연구
2017 .05
-
『일본서기(日本書紀)』 인덕기(仁德紀) 41년조의 사실성 검토와 사료적 활용
역사와현실
2021 .06
-
조사 ‘가’의 기원에 관한 새로운 해석 — 의문첨사설과 일본어 차용설의 비판적 종합 —
언어학
2022 .08
-
중국 조선어 방언의 영상 및 음성 코퍼스 구축 실행방법에 대한 고찰 : 할빈지역 경상도방언 제보자를 실례로
중국조선어문
2017 .09
-
담화표지로 사용되는 ‘我想’의 운율적 특징 : 일상대화를 중심으로
담화와인지
2018 .08
-
유가지관(瑜伽止觀)에 나타난 의미[artha, 義]에 대한 고찰 - 해심밀경(解深密經)「분별유가품(分別瑜伽品)」을 중심으로 -
불교학연구
2016 .12
-
Embodied Cognition : Grammaticalization of Auditory Perception
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2018 .11
-
Grammaticalization of the vision-derived complex prepositions
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2016 .11
-
문말조사 ‘了’, ‘的’ 연구 -공시(共时)문법화를 중심으로
언어과학
2019 .01
-
한국인 학습자를 위한 중국어교육 문법의 비교문 분석 -표준 중국어교육 문법 체계 방안 모색을 중심으로-
한민족문화연구
2024 .09
-
[답평] 「역사와 문학의 횡단 속에서 입체화된 3 · 1운동像」에 대한 답평
문명과 경계
2019 .12
-
비교 의미의 ‘A+過+O’ 형식 분석
중국언어연구
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-820-001021120