메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
장선영 (공주대학교)
저널정보
한국셰익스피어학회 Shakespeare Review Shakespeare Review Vol.52 No.3
발행연도
2016.9
수록면
443 - 469 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper investigates first how the recent discourse of Ernst Kantorowicz’s The King’s Two Bodies is correlated with the recent discourse on political theology and its attention on sovereignty, unfolded with Carl Schmitt, Water Benjamin and Giorgio Agamben. Then, it examines how Kantorowicz’s sovereignty he traces through the interpretation of Shakespeare’s Richard II with the focus on Richard’s deposition is associated with the psychoanalytic interpretation of subjectivity of Sigmund Freud and Jacques Lacan. Thus, this paper bridges between the political theology and the psychoanalysis. It shows that the sovereignty Kantorowicz and Shakespeare represents through the fall of Richard resembles ‘the flesh’ or ‘the monstrous creature’ that Eric Santner terms in defining the psychoanalytic subject, and Freud’ and Lacan’s ‘libido’, ‘lamella’, ‘jouissance’ and ‘death-drive’. Besides, this paper argues that Kantorowicz’s sovereignty of Richard and the psychoanalytic subject is nearer to Lacan’s feminine subjectivity than to his masculine subjectivity. Withdrawing a little from the main interest in the dynamic between Richard and Bolingbroke both in the (new) historicist and the character criticism, it reexamines the female characters in this play, the duchess of Gloucester, the duchess of York and Queen Isabel. The female characters, generally silenced and remaining as minor characters, nevertheless, present the alternative political perspective toward the male-centered politics constituted by blood and family. In this aspect, the female characters function as providing the looking-awry view(gaze as Lacan’s term) contrasted with the traditional, conservative, linear, and centric view, to the front facade of Richard and Bolingbroke. Especially, Isabel who is conscious of this looking awry view and thus feels the ‘nameless woe’, not only embodies the feminine subjectivity but also presages Richard’s sovereignty as seen in his shattering of the mirror.

목차

I. 서론: 칸토로비츠와 현대 정치신학담론
II. 리차드의 주권과 정신분석학적 주체
III. 정신분석학적 주체, 여성쪽 주체양식
IV. 결론
인용문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (27)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-840-001345518