지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This research examines on 120 Chinese characters that represent Korean Onggi, focusing on radicals of ‘缶’ and ‘瓦’ in Chinese characters from 『大漢韓辭典』. Although Chinese characters came from China and we Koreans have borrowed and expressed Korean vocabulary using them, upon being communicated, a language is combined with the local life style and culture and is created again into a new culture. The letters ‘缶’ and ‘瓦’ are representative radicals referring to earthenware. The following is the result of the study on 120 letters related to Onggi.
To begin with, the study found that the letters have been used regardless of the original meaning in Chinese or the practical meaning now used in China. Korea has far more sorts of Onggi and much larger vocabulary of Onggi than China. When it comes to types of Onggi, China has had limited features such as Hang-a-ri(jars), Dong-yi(waterjars) or Dan-ji(pots) whereas Korea had a lot more types of Onggi and it required more letters to refer to each of them. Consequently, there have been many Chines characters borrowed from China and used in Korea but the meanings used are irrelevant to those of Chinese. For example, the letters 甑 or 甗 referring to Sojugori(distillatory jars for Soju, Korean alcohol), or the letters 缾, □, 瓨 or 㼯 referring to Jang-goon (Korean-style liquid carrier jars) all could show that point.
Secondly, as such, Onggis whose words represent Korean(Hangeul) meanings that are irrelevant to the meanings in Chinese are likely to be Korean traditional Onggis. These include Soraegi, Sojugori, Janggoon, etc..
Thirdly, most of the Chinese characters that represent such Onggis are the ones quoted from old documents including 『Jip-woon』, 『Kwang-woon』, 『Ja-hui』, 『Ok-pyun』, 『Jung-ja-tong』, 『Ja-hui-bo』 and so on, which significantly influenced in Korea. This is a key clue that could let us know the transmission process that how Chinese characters used in Korea have been brought in. Also, when referred to the documents such as 『Bang-un』, one can know which part of China Korea had a closer intercourse with. Language does not spread in only one direction. It is a cross-fertilization and thus provides a essential cue to understand the local culture and ethnological phenomenon. Therefore, from a linguistic view, the vocabulary of Korean and that of Chinese need to be compared to each other.
To begin with, the study found that the letters have been used regardless of the original meaning in Chinese or the practical meaning now used in China. Korea has far more sorts of Onggi and much larger vocabulary of Onggi than China. When it comes to types of Onggi, China has had limited features such as Hang-a-ri(jars), Dong-yi(waterjars) or Dan-ji(pots) whereas Korea had a lot more types of Onggi and it required more letters to refer to each of them. Consequently, there have been many Chines characters borrowed from China and used in Korea but the meanings used are irrelevant to those of Chinese. For example, the letters 甑 or 甗 referring to Sojugori(distillatory jars for Soju, Korean alcohol), or the letters 缾, □, 瓨 or 㼯 referring to Jang-goon (Korean-style liquid carrier jars) all could show that point.
Secondly, as such, Onggis whose words represent Korean(Hangeul) meanings that are irrelevant to the meanings in Chinese are likely to be Korean traditional Onggis. These include Soraegi, Sojugori, Janggoon, etc..
Thirdly, most of the Chinese characters that represent such Onggis are the ones quoted from old documents including 『Jip-woon』, 『Kwang-woon』, 『Ja-hui』, 『Ok-pyun』, 『Jung-ja-tong』, 『Ja-hui-bo』 and so on, which significantly influenced in Korea. This is a key clue that could let us know the transmission process that how Chinese characters used in Korea have been brought in. Also, when referred to the documents such as 『Bang-un』, one can know which part of China Korea had a closer intercourse with. Language does not spread in only one direction. It is a cross-fertilization and thus provides a essential cue to understand the local culture and ethnological phenomenon. Therefore, from a linguistic view, the vocabulary of Korean and that of Chinese need to be compared to each other.
목차
1. 서론
2. 옹기 종류에 따른 한자 분류
3. 결론
【參考文獻】
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (19)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국전쟁 이후 옹기공방에서 여성의 역할 변화
실천민속학연구
2022 .08
-
옹기 제작에 나타나는 전승지식의 양상 : 경기도 ‘오부자옹기’를 중심으로
민속연구
2015 .08
-
漢字․漢語 敎學方案 연구Ⅲ
중국문학연구
2022 .02
-
現代中國 인터넷 新字 小考
중국문화연구
2019 .11
-
한국어 중국 漢字語와 중국어 어휘의 對應과 非對應관계에 관한 연구문제
중국학
2017 .01
-
한국 한자와 중국 간화자의 학습 상관성에 관한 대학생 인식 및 학습 실태 연구 - 대학 학부생 중국어 학습자를 중심으로
중국문화연구
2019 .08
-
한자 차용 이름표기에 대하여
건지인문학
2015 .01
-
문․사․철 활용 한자교수법을 위한 제언
중국학
2015 .01
-
漢字․漢語 敎學方案 硏究Ⅳ ― 上, 大, 子를 대상으로
중국문학연구
2023 .03
-
教育用基础汉字析议
한국중어중문학 우수논문집
2021 .11
-
『반찬등속』에 나타난 한자 표기 음식어휘와 생활어휘
언어학 연구
2020 .01
-
초급중국어 학습자의 한자 및 한자교육에 대한 인식조사 연구 - 전공계열별 분석을 중심으로 -
외국학연구
2020 .01
-
중국어사와 국어사의 융합연구－근대중국어 어휘의 전파를 중심으로－
중국어문학
2019 .01
-
淺談簡化字對漢字敎學的負面影響
중국언어연구
2018 .01
-
汉语与汉字的独特关系及在汉语教学中的应用
중국언어연구
2017 .04
-
한자능력시험 선정 한자 고찰
중국어문학지
2019 .01
-
베트남어의 한자어 수용 양상 연구 : 한국어 한자어 수용 실태를 참고하여
인문과학연구
2017 .09
-
漢字, 漢字 語彙 敎育의 現況과 課題
漢文敎育論集
2018 .01
-
외국인 학습자를 위한 성경 한자어 교육 연구 - 사복음서를 중심으로 -
성경원문연구
2019 .10
-
『자전석요』 식기 어휘 고찰
중국학
2017 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-820-002415477