지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to provide the proper direction for the contents of religion textbooks by examining and evaluating the historical trend of religion textbooks and by analyzing the existing religion textbooks currently in use. As for the historical trend of Christian religion textbooks, the history of their publication from the period prior to the official approval of religious studies by the Korean government to the present day has been examined. This study has found that religions textbooks despite loose government regulation has been devoid of academic freedom and the systematic ambiguity in the area of religious studies is directly reflected in them.
Two religion textbooks Religion and Life and Religion and Living have been evaluated in the following three manners: 1) Observation and evaluation from a comparison between 2009 government curriculum of religions studies (Ministry of Education, Science and Technology 2011-361 and 2011-3) and the contents of the two textbooks. 2) Observation and evaluation of the criteria for the textbook content selection (internal or external criteria). 3) Observation and evaluation of the organizing principle for the textbook content (continuity, sequence, integrity). From the comparison, it was noted that despite an attempt to comply with the government curriculum the religion textbooks did not have the government curriculum content evenly distributed in each chapter. Moreover, they have the dual content structure of religious education and faith education. It was also noted that the textbook contents are determined by external criteria from social factors and the emphasis on the value of religions (internal criteria) has been weakened. Lastly, the principles of continuity, sequence, and integration present in the textbooks are tenuous, if not completely absent.
Such flaws have arisen due to difference in educational philosophy between the Korean government and churches. Clearly, systematic ambiguity negatively impacts the content selection and publication of the textbooks. Thus, this study in conformity to the government curriculum suggests a two-track approach to religion textbook publication depending on the school’s mode of administration (public or private) and religious education equipped with fairness and freedom.
Two religion textbooks Religion and Life and Religion and Living have been evaluated in the following three manners: 1) Observation and evaluation from a comparison between 2009 government curriculum of religions studies (Ministry of Education, Science and Technology 2011-361 and 2011-3) and the contents of the two textbooks. 2) Observation and evaluation of the criteria for the textbook content selection (internal or external criteria). 3) Observation and evaluation of the organizing principle for the textbook content (continuity, sequence, integrity). From the comparison, it was noted that despite an attempt to comply with the government curriculum the religion textbooks did not have the government curriculum content evenly distributed in each chapter. Moreover, they have the dual content structure of religious education and faith education. It was also noted that the textbook contents are determined by external criteria from social factors and the emphasis on the value of religions (internal criteria) has been weakened. Lastly, the principles of continuity, sequence, and integration present in the textbooks are tenuous, if not completely absent.
Such flaws have arisen due to difference in educational philosophy between the Korean government and churches. Clearly, systematic ambiguity negatively impacts the content selection and publication of the textbooks. Thus, this study in conformity to the government curriculum suggests a two-track approach to religion textbook publication depending on the school’s mode of administration (public or private) and religious education equipped with fairness and freedom.
목차
I. 들어가면서
Ⅱ. 기독교 종교교과서의 역사적 고찰
Ⅲ. 현행 기독교 종교교과서에 대한 논의 및 평가
Ⅳ. 나가면서: 종교교육 및 종교교과(서)를 위한 제언
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (19)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
고등학교 제2외국어 문화교과서의 ‘종교문화’ 서술의 특징과 과제: 2015 개정 교육과정을 중심으로
종교교육학연구
2024 .06
-
2022 교육과정 개정에 따른 종교 교과의 변화와 교과서 정책의 방향
종교교육학연구
2023 .06
-
중국 초등학교 어문 교과서의 체제와 내용 분석
국어교육연구
2015 .10
-
문법 영역의 성취기준 해설 등이 교과서 내용 구성에 미치는 영향 : 2015 개정 교육과정과 고등학교 국어 교과서를 대상으로
국어교육연구
2018 .06
-
문학 교과서 개발과 구성의 경직성에 대한 비판적 고찰－'작은 교과서'를 지향하며 －
문학교육학
2019 .01
-
제2차 교육과정기 고등학교 국사교과서의 발행과 서술 변화
역사와교육
2017 .01
-
중국어 2급 교재 어휘 분석 - 『國際漢語敎學通用大綱』과 비교하여
중국어문학논집
2019 .06
-
종교학교과서의 자리와 제작 ·관리
종교교육학연구
2021 .01
-
교수요목기 중등 역사 검정 교과서의 발행 상황과 목록화
역사교육
2019 .09
-
종교학 교육과정과 교과서의 불교 서술 고찰
종교교육학연구
2024 .09
-
영어교과서 관련 국내 연구 동향 분석
영어영문학
2022 .08
-
역사교과서 검정 준거자료의 구속력과 집필자의 자율성 -『중학교 역사』 교과서 ‘서양 근대 단원’을 중심으로-
역사와교육
2019 .01
-
한･미 고등학교 중국어 교재 비교 분석
중국어문학
2015 .01
-
Korean College Students’ Perceptions and Preferences in Their English Textbook Evaluation
영어영문학연구
2016 .01
-
외국어 교수법의 변천과 한국어교재와의 상관성에 대한 연구- 전통적 교수방식에서 직접식 교수법까지 -
한말연구
2019 .01
-
초등 영어 디지털교과서의 학교 선정 기준 개발
영어교과교육
2023 .02
-
A Comparative Analysis of the 3rd Grade English Textbooks from China and Korea
영어영문학21
2015 .01
-
역사교육에서 고대사 영역의 내용 체계와 계열성 검토 : 2011 교육과정과 2013 검정교과서를 중심으로
역사교육
2018 .09
-
불교 종립 중등학교의 종교 교과서 개발 : 제도와 현실, 그 만남과 평행의 역사
종교교육학연구
2020 .01
-
Examining the Current English Textbook in Bangladesh: Critical Scrutiny from a Teacher’s Perspective
Foreign Languages Education
2021 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-230-001333309