지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (11)
2020
2018
2017
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As the number of Japanese learners in Indonesia is the second largest in the world, contact situations between Japanese and Indonesian are expected to increase more. With this in mind, I carried out a comparative study on Indonesian learners of Japanese and Japanese native speakers to examine the functions of back-channels within and between utterances. The key findings are as follows.
First, with the back channels within utterances used Japanese native speakers, most (69.4%) were for the function of ‘attentive listening’, but with back channels between utterances, there was no difference in the frequency of ‘attentive listening’, ‘understanding’ and ‘agreement’ functions. On the other hand, with the back channels within utterances used by Indonesian learners, the functions of ‘understanding’, ‘agreement’ and ‘attentive listening’ all accounted for about one third each, while with back channels between utterances the function of ‘agreement’ was the greatest (42.9%), with ‘attentive listening’ and ‘understanding’ less frequent in usage.
Though low in frequency, this study also paid attention to the functions of ‘opposition’ and ‘emotional expression’. Within utterances, Japanese native speakers never use back channels for ‘opposition’ and merely 6.9% for ‘emotional expression’. Between utterances, they use the function of ‘emotional expression’ 13.6% of the time, in other words twice as much as within utterances. Within utterances, Indonesians use back channels for ‘opposition’ 1.5% and ‘emotional expression’ 2.9%, while between utterances they use ‘opposition’ 9.1%. For Japanese native speakers, it is likely that the functions of back-channels of ‘opposition’ can be a barrier to first face-to-face conversation, and disrupt conversation.
‘Attentive listening’ within utterances and ‘emotion’ between utterances are common among Japanese native speakers, but are less common in Indonesian learners. Even with Japanese native speakers, ‘attentive listening’ is more common within utterances than between utterances.
Therefore, ‘attentive listening’ back channels within utterances and ‘emotion’ back channels between utterances can make Indonesian learners sound uninterested and can be a barrier to smooth conversation. However, because the function of ‘emotional expression’ shows active participation in conversation more than any other functions of back-channels, it needs to be introduced in Japanese language learning.
First, with the back channels within utterances used Japanese native speakers, most (69.4%) were for the function of ‘attentive listening’, but with back channels between utterances, there was no difference in the frequency of ‘attentive listening’, ‘understanding’ and ‘agreement’ functions. On the other hand, with the back channels within utterances used by Indonesian learners, the functions of ‘understanding’, ‘agreement’ and ‘attentive listening’ all accounted for about one third each, while with back channels between utterances the function of ‘agreement’ was the greatest (42.9%), with ‘attentive listening’ and ‘understanding’ less frequent in usage.
Though low in frequency, this study also paid attention to the functions of ‘opposition’ and ‘emotional expression’. Within utterances, Japanese native speakers never use back channels for ‘opposition’ and merely 6.9% for ‘emotional expression’. Between utterances, they use the function of ‘emotional expression’ 13.6% of the time, in other words twice as much as within utterances. Within utterances, Indonesians use back channels for ‘opposition’ 1.5% and ‘emotional expression’ 2.9%, while between utterances they use ‘opposition’ 9.1%. For Japanese native speakers, it is likely that the functions of back-channels of ‘opposition’ can be a barrier to first face-to-face conversation, and disrupt conversation.
‘Attentive listening’ within utterances and ‘emotion’ between utterances are common among Japanese native speakers, but are less common in Indonesian learners. Even with Japanese native speakers, ‘attentive listening’ is more common within utterances than between utterances.
Therefore, ‘attentive listening’ back channels within utterances and ‘emotion’ back channels between utterances can make Indonesian learners sound uninterested and can be a barrier to smooth conversation. However, because the function of ‘emotional expression’ shows active participation in conversation more than any other functions of back-channels, it needs to be introduced in Japanese language learning.
목차
Ⅰ. はじめに
Ⅱ. 先行研究の検討および問題の提起
Ⅲ. 研究方法
Ⅳ. 調査の結果と分析
Ⅴ. おわりに
参考文献
【논문초록】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
표현형식과 기능분류로 본 원격접촉 일본어 청자언어행동 ― 인니 일본어 학습자와 일본어 모어화자와의 비교분석 ―
일본어교육연구
2024 .03
-
対人関係に応じた日本語母語話者のスタイル切り換え : 『BTSJによる日本語話し言葉コーパス』を用いて
동북아 문화연구
2017 .03
-
コミュニケーション上の問題の引き金となり得る 日本語母語話者の会話参加に関する一考察 ―日韓接触場面の意味交渉を中心に―
일본어교육연구
2016 .01
-
대학 교양 일본어학습에 관한 기초조사 ‒ 서울소재 S대학의 교양 일본어학습자를 중심으로 ‒
일본근대학연구
2017 .01
-
자유 대화에서의 한국어 원어민 화자와 한국어 고급 학습자들의 발화 속도 비교
한국어 교육
2018 .01
-
플립드러닝형 대학 수업에서 사전학습과 수업참여와의 관계: 소집단 토의 발화 분석을 중심으로
교육심리연구
2019 .06
-
말더듬 성인의 유창한 발화와 비유창한 발화의 말속도 및 발화 길이 특성
Audiology and Speech Research
2019 .01
-
플립드러닝과 팀기반학습을 통합한 대학수업에서 사전학습과 팀활동 참여와의 관계
교육공학연구
2019 .01
-
相互作用の?点で見る謝罪行動の結果について －韓日女性母語話者の使用傾向を中心に－
일본어교육연구
2017 .08
-
聞き手の反応に関する日韓比較－トーク番組の司会者の発話を中心に－
일본언어문화
2018 .01
-
初対面会話における沈黙の男女差について
일본언어문화
2021 .10
-
PBL 기반 일본어 ‘교과교재연구 및 지도법’ 수업사례 연구
일본어교육연구
2017 .01
-
한국의 한국어와 일본어 관련 대학원에서의 일본어 모어화자 학위논문(1980∼2017년)의 주제 분석
동북아 문화연구
2018 .06
-
日本語母語話者と韓国人日本語学習者による終助詞｢よ｣の使用実態‒談話完成テストの調査結果に基づいて‒
일본근대학연구
2019 .01
-
일본어 상급 학습자의 복합어 운용 실태 연구 - 모어화자와의 비교를 통하여 -
일본어교육연구
2019 .01
-
『んです』の使用実態と特徴 - 日本語母語話者と韓国人日本語学習者の会話を中心に-
동북아 문화연구
2023 .03
-
종결어미 ‘-거든(요)’의 의미와 기능 연구1
문법교육
2016 .01
-
일본어 상급 학습자의 조건표현 운용 실태 연구-모어화자와의 작문 비교를 통하여-
일본어교육연구
2020 .01
-
한국어 화자에게 공통적으로 나타나는 불쾌한 일본어 표현
동북아 문화연구
2019 .09
-
공감적 발화와 훈육적 발화 -학생들의 과학적 설명 구성에서 두 초등 교사의 대조적인 접근-
한국과학교육학회지
2023 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-910-001713600