지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2017.12
- 수록면
- 61 - 77 (19page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this paper I focus on the recent reemergence of the question of labor’s status as a commodity in critical studies of the political economy. Polanyi’s critique of the ‘market society’ has become an increasingly popular way of criticizing the neoliberal capitalist regime after the 2007-9 economic crisis.
I start by focusing on the Polanyian conception of labor as a fictitious commodity and the way in which it stresses the tension that stands at the center of the modern industrial market society. I highlight the way Polanyi’s ‘double movement’ counters the laissez-faire myth of the market as a given that enforces itself naturally and produces optimal outcomes. In the second part of my paper I focus on the shortcomings of this explanation. I argue that this framework limits our understanding of the dynamical processes that structure the
concrete capitalist system. The double movement concept provides a general picture of the cycle through which forces that support and forces that oppose increasing marketisation are put into opposition, but does not offer much when it comes to the ways in which we can understand how these forces are concretely structured in a concrete historical period. In other words, the Polanyian explanation does not provide much into understanding the class (and sub-class) dynamics that lead to the appearance of the ‘double movement’.
To make such an understanding possible I argue that we need to return to Marx’s understanding of labor power as a real commodity. With its role in the production process and the process of self-valorization of capital, along with the effects and influences it bears on distribution and circulation processes, this standpoint allows for a better starting point from which one can see the concrete dynamics of real existing capitalism.
I start by focusing on the Polanyian conception of labor as a fictitious commodity and the way in which it stresses the tension that stands at the center of the modern industrial market society. I highlight the way Polanyi’s ‘double movement’ counters the laissez-faire myth of the market as a given that enforces itself naturally and produces optimal outcomes. In the second part of my paper I focus on the shortcomings of this explanation. I argue that this framework limits our understanding of the dynamical processes that structure the
concrete capitalist system. The double movement concept provides a general picture of the cycle through which forces that support and forces that oppose increasing marketisation are put into opposition, but does not offer much when it comes to the ways in which we can understand how these forces are concretely structured in a concrete historical period. In other words, the Polanyian explanation does not provide much into understanding the class (and sub-class) dynamics that lead to the appearance of the ‘double movement’.
To make such an understanding possible I argue that we need to return to Marx’s understanding of labor power as a real commodity. With its role in the production process and the process of self-valorization of capital, along with the effects and influences it bears on distribution and circulation processes, this standpoint allows for a better starting point from which one can see the concrete dynamics of real existing capitalism.
목차
Ⅰ. Introduction1
Ⅱ. The main issue
Ⅲ. Conclusion
References
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
폴라니 인식론의 인성교육적 함의
경인교육대학교 교육연구원 교육논총
2018 .01
-
책상을 따라 문 쪽으로
마르크스주의 연구
2023 .02
-
자유주의 정치경제학의 과제 : 신자유주의의 퇴진과 그 이후
국제정치연구
2016 .12
-
마르크스의 ‘자동주체’ 비판 : 정치경제학 비판과 비판적 주체이론의 재구성
마르크스주의 연구
2017 .08
-
현대 사회적경제의 기원에 대한 시론: Karl Polanyi의 경제사상으로부터
사회적가치와 기업연구
2020 .08
-
시간을 둘러싼 투쟁은 마르크스 이해와 자본주의 이해의 핵심 : 류동민, 『시간은 어떻게 돈이 되었는가? － 마르크스 경제학으로 본 자본주의 사회의 시간 싸움』(휴머니스트, 2018)
마르크스주의 연구
2018 .08
-
북한의 노동력 배분제도
법학논집
2022 .06
-
Evaluation of Recent Labor Market Situation through Labor Market Transition Rate
[BOK] Quarterly Bulletin(QB)
2017 .06
-
자본주의의 역사·제도적 조건과 자본주의적 소유라는 질문
마르크스주의 연구
2017 .11
-
The Role of Labor Market Flexibility on Labor Markets in India
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2015 .09
-
노동시장정책과 쟁점 검토
노동법논총
2015 .08
-
Marx on a Hegemony in a World Market and the History of (Variegated) Capitalism
한국사회학회 사회학대회 논문집
2020 .12
-
글로벌 원자재가격 변화가 한국 금융시장에 미치는 영향
金融工學硏究
2024 .03
-
헌법상 강제노동금지원칙에 대한 검토
노동법학
2018 .09
-
도덕경제와 노동관계의 규범성
산업관계연구
2015 .09
-
M. Polanyi의 인격적 지식론이 장학에 대해 갖는 함의
교육행정학연구
2018 .12
-
The Youth Struggle for Jobs in South Korea: Dualism, Inequality, and Youth Labor Market
JIAS
2020 .01
-
시대변혁기에 있어서 노동법의 역할
노동법포럼
2017 .02
-
노동운동에서 1987년의 유산과 새로운 도전들 : 계급구성과 계급형성
경제와사회
2017 .12
-
사회적 경제를 통한 국제개발협력 프로젝트 성과지표 활용 방안
연구보고서
2019 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-301-001751641