메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
강지원 (경희대학교) 박월선 (경희대학교) 고재윤 (경희대학교)
저널정보
한국서비스경영학회 서비스경영학회지 서비스경영학회지 제19권 제1호
발행연도
2018.3
수록면
1 - 20 (20page)
DOI
10.15706/jksms.2018.19.1.001

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study explored the relationship between bottled water brands and their selection attributes for the first time in Korea and carried out empirical analysis on its relationship with consumers’ purchasing behaviors.
This research conducted a survey with consumers aged over 20 who have purchased domestically produced bottled water products within one month’s time. An online-based survey was conducted from the 26th of September 2017 to the 29th of September. A total of 338 responses to the questionnaires were used for analysis. The survey performed frequency analysis, reliability analysis, correlation analysis, confirmatory factor analysis and pass analysis using SPSS 20.0 and AMOS 20.0 programs.
The summary of hypothesis verification is as follows. First, based on the factor analysis, variables were classified into brand image, selection attributes of the bottled water, ingredient, taste, package design, local characteristics, price, purchase intention. Second, the hypothesis inspection concluded that brand image has a positive influence on all of the selection attributes of the bottled water products. However, of all the selection attributes of the bottled water, only the ingredient, local characteristics and price were positively correlated with the purchasing intention to a meaningful extent. Hence, only H1, H2-1, H2-4, H2-5, H3 hypotheses are accepted while H2-2, H2-3 hypotheses have been rejected.
Findings of this research provide both the existing players and those newly entering the bottled water market with suggestions for better marketing strategies and ways to enhance their competitiveness.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 연구방법
Ⅳ. 연구결과
Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌

참고문헌 (69)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-324-001883570