지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study examines Park In-hwan’s personal grammar and its thick meaning through viewing his diverse categories of poetic nonsense from the point of view of the ‘category theory of poetic nonsense’. Modern poetry shows the points that breakaway from normal sentence in category theory, syntax, and semantics. ‘Category theory of poetic nonsense’ is materialized such as ‘the nonsense of situation’, ‘the nonsense of words’, ‘the category mistake’ and ‘enigma’ by those points through ‘lexis’, ‘syntax’ and ‘the form of poetry. ‘Nonsense’ resulting from breaking away from normal grammar has poetic meaning because it creates new meaning through ‘intensive unification’ in the ‘thick’ category of sense, though it shows contradiction and breakaway in ‘shallow’ order of language.
The expressions of poetic nonsense show up through ‘category mistake’ and ‘nonsense of language’ in phrases. Viewing at the perspective of sentences, expressions showing ‘the nonsense of situation’ or ‘enigma’ also show up sometimes. Poetic nonsense expressions have complex structure that is mixed with diverse categories of nonsense. In addition, his poetry has a characteristic that there are conceptual words in the expressions of modifiers. ‘The nonsense of situation’ signifies mostly hallucination and illusion in his poetry. This nonsense is closely related with intense fear or despair facing the horrible corpse of war. The figure of a narrator is mainly laid in the boundary line of heterogeneous worlds such ‘existence and absence’, ‘darkness and brightness’, ‘two fires’. ‘Narrator standing at the boundary line’ has the meaning that he has the duty as a poet who has to express incompatible two worlds which coexist in the real world. ‘Category mistake’ is mostly related with indirect expression of psychology of the narrator I. ‘Category mistake’ shows up in the adjective phrases which contain expressions such as ‘anxious’, ‘unhappy’ and ‘words related with death’. These signify his emotion in wartime such as ‘despair’, ‘death’, ‘anxiety’ and ‘unhappiness. This feeling is also expressed by turning to ‘deity’ or ‘moon’. Context that belong to ‘Category mistake’ is compose of ‘abstract Chinese words’ or ‘abstract terms’. ‘The nonsense of words’ is related with two experiences. One is Korean War experience and the other is the experience of unfamiliar civilization of Seattle, USA. ‘The nonsense of words’ uses strange words and their connection that are not right in syntax. Those words express anxiety and fear. In addition, ‘The nonsense of words’ of him has a characteristic that it has expressions which is lack in response between words to words. It mostly shows up as a discord tense conflicting ‘past’, ‘present’ and ‘future’. It is related with the pursuit of simultaneous thinking as he explained in his poetics.
‘Enigma’ is mostly shows up in the field of the title and body of his poetry. He makes imagery complexly in the body of poetry, and shows macroscopic view point by the ‘title’ of poetry. For example, ‘night of a colonized harbor’ and ‘Incheon harbor’ are poems that belong to that category. ‘Enigma’ is related with the worry as a poet about compatriot and state of affairs. This mental agony is embodied in his poetry mostly as ‘wall’, ‘problems’ and etc which have the form of ‘blank mark’.
The expressions of poetic nonsense show up through ‘category mistake’ and ‘nonsense of language’ in phrases. Viewing at the perspective of sentences, expressions showing ‘the nonsense of situation’ or ‘enigma’ also show up sometimes. Poetic nonsense expressions have complex structure that is mixed with diverse categories of nonsense. In addition, his poetry has a characteristic that there are conceptual words in the expressions of modifiers. ‘The nonsense of situation’ signifies mostly hallucination and illusion in his poetry. This nonsense is closely related with intense fear or despair facing the horrible corpse of war. The figure of a narrator is mainly laid in the boundary line of heterogeneous worlds such ‘existence and absence’, ‘darkness and brightness’, ‘two fires’. ‘Narrator standing at the boundary line’ has the meaning that he has the duty as a poet who has to express incompatible two worlds which coexist in the real world. ‘Category mistake’ is mostly related with indirect expression of psychology of the narrator I. ‘Category mistake’ shows up in the adjective phrases which contain expressions such as ‘anxious’, ‘unhappy’ and ‘words related with death’. These signify his emotion in wartime such as ‘despair’, ‘death’, ‘anxiety’ and ‘unhappiness. This feeling is also expressed by turning to ‘deity’ or ‘moon’. Context that belong to ‘Category mistake’ is compose of ‘abstract Chinese words’ or ‘abstract terms’. ‘The nonsense of words’ is related with two experiences. One is Korean War experience and the other is the experience of unfamiliar civilization of Seattle, USA. ‘The nonsense of words’ uses strange words and their connection that are not right in syntax. Those words express anxiety and fear. In addition, ‘The nonsense of words’ of him has a characteristic that it has expressions which is lack in response between words to words. It mostly shows up as a discord tense conflicting ‘past’, ‘present’ and ‘future’. It is related with the pursuit of simultaneous thinking as he explained in his poetics.
‘Enigma’ is mostly shows up in the field of the title and body of his poetry. He makes imagery complexly in the body of poetry, and shows macroscopic view point by the ‘title’ of poetry. For example, ‘night of a colonized harbor’ and ‘Incheon harbor’ are poems that belong to that category. ‘Enigma’ is related with the worry as a poet about compatriot and state of affairs. This mental agony is embodied in his poetry mostly as ‘wall’, ‘problems’ and etc which have the form of ‘blank mark’.
#'시적 무의미'의 범주론
#'상황의 무의미'
#환상과 현실의 경계
#'범주적 이탈'
#불안과 불행의 '관념적 표현'
#'언어의 무의미'
#전쟁현장과 시애틀 문명
#불일치한 시제
#'수수께끼'
#'문제되는 것'
#category theory of 'poetic nonsense'
#the nonsense of situation
#boundary between illusion and reality
#category mistake
#nonsense of words
#war and Western civilization
#discord of tense
#enigma
목차
국문초록
I. 서론
Ⅱ. ‘시적 무의미의 범주론’에 관하여
Ⅲ. 박인환 시에 나타난 ‘시적 무의미’의 범주들과 그 특성
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (40)
참고문헌 신청
[단행본] - 문승묵 / 2006 / 박인환 전집 / 예옥
[단행본] - 맹문재 / 2008 / 박인환 전집 / 실천문학
[단행본] - 엄동섭 / 2015 / 박인환 문학전집 / 소명출판
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 강계숙 / 2013 / ‘불안’의 정동, 진리, 시대성 : 박인환 시의 새로운 이해 / 현대문학의 연구 (51) : 431 ~ 469
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 공현진 / 2016 / 해방기 박인환 시의 모더니즘 특성 연구 - 『新詩論』 제1집과 『새로운 都市와 市民들의 合唱』을 중심으로 - / 우리문학연구 (52) : 307 ~ 343
[단행본] - 맹문재 / 2008 / 박인환 전집 / 실천문학
[단행본] - 엄동섭 / 2015 / 박인환 문학전집 / 소명출판
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 강계숙 / 2013 / ‘불안’의 정동, 진리, 시대성 : 박인환 시의 새로운 이해 / 현대문학의 연구 (51) : 431 ~ 469
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 공현진 / 2016 / 해방기 박인환 시의 모더니즘 특성 연구 - 『新詩論』 제1집과 『새로운 都市와 市民들의 合唱』을 중심으로 - / 우리문학연구 (52) : 307 ~ 343
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
김춘수 무의미시의 정체성 재규정 - 시기 범주의 조정과 사전적 의미의 탐색을 통한
인문사회과학연구
2015 .01
-
시에 있어서의 미술과 음악 이론ㆍ기법의 차용 : 김춘수의 ｢이중섭｣ 연작을 중심으로
한국문학과 예술
2017 .03
-
무의미시(론)의 기원에 대한 재고 - 관념과 역사(이데올로기)의 공통 토대로서 재현적 사유
한국문예비평연구
2020 .01
-
김춘수의 ‘무의미시’에 드러나는 헤테로토피아 연구- 『처용단장』을 중심으로-
우리문학연구
2023 .07
-
“赋兼比兴”的构成、变形与文学意义
중국문학
2016 .01
-
‘괄호’와 ‘쉼표’의 (무)의미 생성 연구—김춘수 시를 중심으로
현대문학이론연구
2022 .09
-
언어놀이에서의 그 어떤 뻔한 무의미와 혹들의 발견
대동철학
2018 .06
-
How Can You Win the Adversity? It’s nonsense
새한영어영문학회 학술발표회 논문집
2018 .05
-
황인찬의 시적 변모와 새로운 무의미시의 탄생 - 1950년대 모더니즘 시인들과의 영향관계를 중심으로
한국문예비평연구
2022 .12
-
V. S. 나이폴 『도착의 수수께끼』의 코즈모폴리턴 서술자
신영어영문학
2017 .11
-
김준오 『시론』의 판형별 변화 양상 연구 -초판(1982)에서 4판(1997)까지를 중심으로
한국문학논총
2024 .08
-
무의미 시론과 비대상 시론의 의미 구성 기제에 관한 인지시학적 연구
한국시학연구
2020 .02
-
A. E. 하우스먼의 시 ｢신병｣(“The Recruit”)의 극적 독백
현대영미시연구
2023 .06
-
김춘수 시의 추상으로의 변모와 세잔의 영향 연구 - 릴케의 『세잔에 관한 편지들』을 중심으로
한국시학연구
2019 .05
-
매체적 관점에서의 한국근대시 시제(詩題) 연구 -개화기시가에서 근대 자유시 이전까지-
한국언어문학
2015 .01
-
대학생 시 쓰기 교육에 관한 현상학적 연구
한국문예창작
2024 .08
-
메타시의 새로운 영역
어문논집
2023 .04
-
문학교육에서 ‘시적 현실’의 문제
우리말글
2024 .06
-
قضية الفكر في الشعر العربي الحديث: دراسة تطبيقية
아랍어와 아랍문학
2018 .01
-
한국 현대시론에 있어 내용-형식 관계와 자유의 문제 : 조지훈, 김수영, 김춘수를 중심으로
우리문학연구
2017 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
해방기 박인환 시의 모더니즘 특성 연구 : 『新詩論』 제1집과 『새로운 都市와 市民들의 合唱』을 중심으로
공현진
,
이경수
우리문학연구
2016
.10
김혜순 시의 “죽음” 이미지와 보편성의 문제 - 『죽음의 자서전』, 『날개환상통』을 중심으로
이찬
한국근대문학연구
2021
.04
한국 현대 노년시에 나타난 죽음의식 ― 시간성과 죽음에 대한 존재론적 구조를 중심으로
이현정
한국시학연구
2020
.11
죽음의 경험적 지식 구성과 이해 : 죽었다 살아난 사람들의 이야기를 대상으로
한정훈
민속연구
2018
.08
1950년대 전쟁 체험의 시적 양상과 주체의 문제 : 박인환과 전봉건을 중심으로
박민규
우리문학연구
2018
.10
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0