지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2018.12
- 수록면
- 459 - 468 (10page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans (KDRIs), a set of reference intake values, have served as a basis for guiding a balanced diet that promotes health and prevents disease in the general Korean population. In the process of developing DRIs, a systematic review has played an important role in helping the DRI committees make evidence-based and transparent decisions for updating the next DRIs. Thus, the 2015 KDRI steering committee applied the systematic review framework to the revision process of the KDRIs. The purpose of this article is to summarize the revision process for the 2015 KDRIs by focusing on the systematic review framework.
MATERIALS/METHODS: The methods used to develop the systematic review framework for 2015 KDRIs followed the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Tufts Evidence-based Practice Center. The framework for systematic review of the 2015 KDRIs comprised of the 3 following steps: (1) development of an analytic framework and refinement of key questions and search terms; (2) literature search and data extraction; and, (3) appraisal of the literature and summarizing the results.
RESULTS: A total of 203,237 studies were retrieved through the above procedure, with 2,324 of these studies included in the analysis. General information, main results, comments of reviewers, and results of quality assessment were extracted and organized by study design. The average points of quality appraisals were 3.0 (range, 0-5) points for intervention, 6.1 (0-9) points for cohort, 6.0 (3-9) points for nested case-control, 5.4 (1-8) points for case-control, 14.6 (0-22) points for cross-sectional studies, and 7.0 (0-11) points for reviews.
CONCLUSIONS: Systematic review helped to establish the 2015 KDRIs as a useful tool for evidence-based approach. Collaborative efforts to improve the framework for systematic review should be continued for future KDRIs.
MATERIALS/METHODS: The methods used to develop the systematic review framework for 2015 KDRIs followed the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Tufts Evidence-based Practice Center. The framework for systematic review of the 2015 KDRIs comprised of the 3 following steps: (1) development of an analytic framework and refinement of key questions and search terms; (2) literature search and data extraction; and, (3) appraisal of the literature and summarizing the results.
RESULTS: A total of 203,237 studies were retrieved through the above procedure, with 2,324 of these studies included in the analysis. General information, main results, comments of reviewers, and results of quality assessment were extracted and organized by study design. The average points of quality appraisals were 3.0 (range, 0-5) points for intervention, 6.1 (0-9) points for cohort, 6.0 (3-9) points for nested case-control, 5.4 (1-8) points for case-control, 14.6 (0-22) points for cross-sectional studies, and 7.0 (0-11) points for reviews.
CONCLUSIONS: Systematic review helped to establish the 2015 KDRIs as a useful tool for evidence-based approach. Collaborative efforts to improve the framework for systematic review should be continued for future KDRIs.
목차
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Evidence-based approaches for establishing the 2015 Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans
Nutrition Research and Practice
2018 .12
-
Perspectives on the systematic review for the 2020 Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans for calcium
Nutrition Research and Practice
2022 .05
-
Perspectives on the systematic review for the 2020 Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans for calcium
Nutrition Research and Practice
2022 .05
-
2020 KDRIs Special Series 발간사
Journal of Nutrition and Health
2021 .10
-
Dietary Reference Intakes of sodium for Koreans: focusing on a new DRI component for chronic disease risk reduction
Nutrition Research and Practice
2022 .05
-
Dietary Reference Intakes of sodium for Koreans: focusing on a new DRI component for chronic disease risk reduction
Nutrition Research and Practice
2022 .05
-
Nutritional Status and Body Composition in Korean Myopathy Patients
Clinical Nutrition Research
2016 .01
-
한국 성인의 식생활 정보 획득 특성과 한국인 영양소 섭취기준에 대한 인식 분석
Journal of Nutrition and Health
2024 .12
-
2020 한국인 영양소 섭취기준 활용 자료를 이용한 영양교육 프로그램의 적용 및 효과: 경상남도 및 경기도 지역 대학생을 대상으로
Journal of Nutrition and Health
2023 .12
-
Choline intake and its dietary reference values in Korea and other countries: a review
Nutrition Research and Practice
2022 .05
-
Choline intake and its dietary reference values in Korea and other countries: a review
Nutrition Research and Practice
2022 .05
-
2020 한국인 영양소 섭취기준: 아연
Journal of Nutrition and Health
2022 .08
-
Nutritional status of Korean elderly with dementia in a long-term care facility in Hongseong
Nutrition Research and Practice
2019 .02
-
Nutritional status of Korean elderly with dementia in a long-term care facility in Hongseong
Nutrition Research and Practice
2019 .02
-
우리 국민의 총 지방 및 지방산 일상 섭취량 추정 및 평가: 2019 - 2021년 국민건강영양조사 자료를 활용한 단면조사연구
대한지역사회영양학회지
2023 .10
-
Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans with special consideration to older adults
Nutrition Research and Practice
2022 .05
-
Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans with special consideration to older adults
Nutrition Research and Practice
2022 .05
-
2020 한국인 영양소 섭취기준 활용 자료 개발
Journal of Nutrition and Health
2022 .02
-
Effect of Nutrition Counseling Program on Weight Control in Obese University Students
Clinical Nutrition Research
2017 .01
-
Issues pertaining to Mg, Zn and Cu in the 2020 Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans
Nutrition Research and Practice
2022 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-594-000190456