지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제110호
- 발행연도
- 2018.12
- 수록면
- 269 - 304 (36page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2018.12.110.269
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Examined in this article are historical studies -individual academic worksdedicated to the subject of the March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement, and have been announced by Korean history scholars since the year 1990 through summer of 2018. The objective is to assess certain trends featured in those studies, and where such trends are apparently heading.
For the past three decades, the academic circle’s study of the March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement shifted its focus of examination from the movement’s own meaning as an actual event as well as its popularity gauged by the number of people who joined it, to how the spirit of the movement should be inherited to our descendants or succeeded by future generations, and to the issue of appropriate remembering, commemoration and appreciation of the movement’s own symbolic nature. Studies of the March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement’s memories and its general images also show some internal diversities, as those from the historical society have been trying to determine how collective memories exist, operate and lead to honoring and commemorating, or define the collective memories’ relationship with individual policy stances or agendas of political/social factions, while those from the literature society or cultural/conceptual history scholars have been putting efforts in visualizing how certain symbolic images were created and fluctuated in the individuals’ consciousness or their everyday life, and to reveal certain social climate and trends of the time through them.
These trends were no one-time impulse interests, and were actually the results of many historians’ painful efforts to properly honor and remember the March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement, and to resolve some problems the March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement studies have been facing recently. Thanks to such efforts we are now equipped with better, diverse, and more comprehensive understanding of the movement. New historical resources were identified and then tapped into, and people’s accessibility to such resources was significantly increased through publication of various manuals and digitalized sources. Advances made in either developing or managing historial data, new historial theories and methodologies recently devised, and the expansion in perspectives and viewpoints, have all contributed to the accomplishments examined in this article.
For the past three decades, the academic circle’s study of the March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement shifted its focus of examination from the movement’s own meaning as an actual event as well as its popularity gauged by the number of people who joined it, to how the spirit of the movement should be inherited to our descendants or succeeded by future generations, and to the issue of appropriate remembering, commemoration and appreciation of the movement’s own symbolic nature. Studies of the March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement’s memories and its general images also show some internal diversities, as those from the historical society have been trying to determine how collective memories exist, operate and lead to honoring and commemorating, or define the collective memories’ relationship with individual policy stances or agendas of political/social factions, while those from the literature society or cultural/conceptual history scholars have been putting efforts in visualizing how certain symbolic images were created and fluctuated in the individuals’ consciousness or their everyday life, and to reveal certain social climate and trends of the time through them.
These trends were no one-time impulse interests, and were actually the results of many historians’ painful efforts to properly honor and remember the March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement, and to resolve some problems the March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement studies have been facing recently. Thanks to such efforts we are now equipped with better, diverse, and more comprehensive understanding of the movement. New historical resources were identified and then tapped into, and people’s accessibility to such resources was significantly increased through publication of various manuals and digitalized sources. Advances made in either developing or managing historial data, new historial theories and methodologies recently devised, and the expansion in perspectives and viewpoints, have all contributed to the accomplishments examined in this article.
목차
머리말
1. 1990~2018년의 연구 성과
2. 최근 30년간의 연구동향
3. 연구의 방향성과 과제
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
영어와 한국어의 공범주 현상 비교 분석
현대영어영문학
2018 .01
-
<레닌기치>를 통해 본 중앙아시아 고려인들의 독립운동 인식 - 3.1운동과 8.15해방에 대한 인식의 변화를 중심으로 -
인문과학
2016 .01
-
HISTORY TEACHER’S REVIEW: WHAT DOES THE MARCH 1ST INDEPENDENCE MOVEMENT OF 1919 MEAN TO US?
Public History & Museum
2019 .12
-
영어와 한국어의 이동현상에 대한 연구
영어영문학
2018 .08
-
When can Topics be Questioned?
생성문법연구
2015 .01
-
2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 『한국사』교과서의 독립운동사 구성 방식 검토
역사교육
2020 .12
-
주제화·wh-이동과 어순섞기 현상에서의 비대칭성
신영어영문학
2017 .11
-
현대 패션 윈도우 디스플레이에 나타난 키네티시즘 움직임 특성
복식문화연구
2018 .01
-
7차 교육과정 이후 고등학교 <한국 근･현대사>･<한국사> 교과서의 1920년대 여성운동에 대한 서술 추이 연구
史叢(사총)
2024 .09
-
일본군‘위안부’ 문제의 탈진실 정치 - 아베 정권을 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2021 .03
-
역사 사료적으로 살펴본 3·1운동 관련 ‘문헌’
신학지남
2019 .03
-
한국 근대 정치ㆍ사회단체의 ‘국민’ 만들기 - 독립협회ㆍ대한자강회ㆍ대한협회ㆍ신간회를 중심으로 -
숭실사학
2017 .01
-
한국기독교역사연구소 사회운동 연구 동향과 과제
한국기독교와 역사
2023 .03
-
오사운동 시기 孫文集團의 민권정치론
중국근현대사연구
2022 .12
-
3·1 운동, 죽음과 희생의 민족서사
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2018 .12
-
The March 1st Movement and the Red Thread of International Peace History
Korea Observer
2019 .01
-
관용적 요소가 조각문, 강조, 대조초점, 이동에 관해 말해 주는 것
언어학 연구
2016 .07
-
19세기 말~20세기 초 강화유학자들의 기독교 수용양태 연구
한국양명학회 학술대회 논문집
2015 .10
-
한국교회의 병리현상과 신흥종교운동
한국기독교와 역사
2018 .03
-
Ways of solving (counter-)cyclic A-movement in phase theory
언어연구
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-911-000288998