지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제108호
- 발행연도
- 2018.6
- 수록면
- 175 - 208 (34page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2018.06.108.175
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The year 2018, which marks the 99<SUP>th</SUP> year since the March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement in Korea, is also the 150<SUP>th</SUP> year since the commencement of the Japanese Meiji reform. Prime Minister Abe of Japan praised the Meiji era in his annual addressing of the nation early this year, and all Japanese governmental agencies as well as local authorities have been celebrating the Meiji legacy through various ceremonial gatherings.
A self-reflection of the very period, however, during which Japan invaded Joseon is nowhere to be found in such Japanese celebrations. In the eyes of the Koreans, the 150<SUP>th</SUP> anniversary of the Meiji reforms is an event that could never be celebrated unless the history of invasion and memory of oppression are eliminated from one’s mind entirely. It has already been 70 years since the Korean peninsula was liberated from Japan’s colonial ruling, but Japan’s heartfelt remorse of its criminal acts, or sincere reconciliation between Korea and Japan, are still too far way on the horizon. Hopefully the 100<SUP>th</SUP> anniversary of the Korean March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement next year would serve as a reminder, as well as an evidence of the empty nature of the Meiji reforms’ 150 years worth of legacy.
In Korea, commemoration of the March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement has continued every year, with big events turning up once in a while every decade. Those commemorations were accompanied by various studies that have built upon each other and accumulated impressively. And most interestingly, the Korean efforts were never alone. After the end of the second World War, Joseon History scholars in Japan also took notice of the significant nature of this very movement.
The Joseon people living in Japan, as well as a group of progressive Japanese scholars, led these studies for years, striving to overcome the remnants of Colonialism. They were also always heavily mindful of the fact that they were members of the oppressor state Japan. That must have been very hard upon them philosophically. But at the same time it might have probably driven them to produce works that differentiated themselves from those which were generated by Korean historians, or even exceed them.
Primarily examined in this article is how the Post-war Japanese Joseon History scholars have viewed the March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement. Focus of such examination would be some noteworthy works that emerged around the time of the Movement’s 50<SUP>th</SUP> anniversary, which could also serve as a comparison for how things are going on in the eve of the 100<SUP>th</SUP>. Such comparison should throw us a quintessential question which we could never afford to ignore: what we should really be honoring at this juncture, and how could we properly commemorate the 100<SUP>th</SUP> anniversary of this magnificent historical event.
A self-reflection of the very period, however, during which Japan invaded Joseon is nowhere to be found in such Japanese celebrations. In the eyes of the Koreans, the 150<SUP>th</SUP> anniversary of the Meiji reforms is an event that could never be celebrated unless the history of invasion and memory of oppression are eliminated from one’s mind entirely. It has already been 70 years since the Korean peninsula was liberated from Japan’s colonial ruling, but Japan’s heartfelt remorse of its criminal acts, or sincere reconciliation between Korea and Japan, are still too far way on the horizon. Hopefully the 100<SUP>th</SUP> anniversary of the Korean March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement next year would serve as a reminder, as well as an evidence of the empty nature of the Meiji reforms’ 150 years worth of legacy.
In Korea, commemoration of the March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement has continued every year, with big events turning up once in a while every decade. Those commemorations were accompanied by various studies that have built upon each other and accumulated impressively. And most interestingly, the Korean efforts were never alone. After the end of the second World War, Joseon History scholars in Japan also took notice of the significant nature of this very movement.
The Joseon people living in Japan, as well as a group of progressive Japanese scholars, led these studies for years, striving to overcome the remnants of Colonialism. They were also always heavily mindful of the fact that they were members of the oppressor state Japan. That must have been very hard upon them philosophically. But at the same time it might have probably driven them to produce works that differentiated themselves from those which were generated by Korean historians, or even exceed them.
Primarily examined in this article is how the Post-war Japanese Joseon History scholars have viewed the March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement. Focus of such examination would be some noteworthy works that emerged around the time of the Movement’s 50<SUP>th</SUP> anniversary, which could also serve as a comparison for how things are going on in the eve of the 100<SUP>th</SUP>. Such comparison should throw us a quintessential question which we could never afford to ignore: what we should really be honoring at this juncture, and how could we properly commemorate the 100<SUP>th</SUP> anniversary of this magnificent historical event.
목차
머리말 : 3.1운동 50주년과 메이지유신 100주년
1. 3.1운동 50주년 이전의 3.1운동 인식 : 식민주의 극복의 과제
2. 3.1운동 50주년 이후의 3.1운동 인식 : 역사 연구와 현실 문제의 거리
맺음말 : 메이지유신 150주년과 3.1운동 100주년
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (34)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
3 · 1운동 수업 동향과 전망
역사교육
2019 .09
-
The March 1st Movement and the Red Thread of International Peace History
Korea Observer
2019 .01
-
3·1운동 100년의 ‘봄·밤’에 ‘바람’ -박찬승과 권보드래의 3·1운동 서사
역사비평
2019 .11
-
파른의 한국 선사학 연구에서의 지향점
학림
2021 .01
-
북한 정부의 3‧1운동 기념과 표상 - 『로동신문』(1946~2019)을 중심으로 -
동방학지
2020 .01
-
Special Discussion on the March First Movement’s Centennial 〈The March First Movement in East Asian History〉
Journal of Northeast Asian History
2018 .12
-
“비록 이름은 알려지지 않았지만, 꿈은 이루어졌나요?” : 초등학교 3․1 운동 역할극 수업 실행과 성찰
역사교육논집
2016 .01
-
3 · 1운동사 연구의 최근 동향과 방향성
역사와현실
2018 .12
-
3·1운동 100주년의 연구와 ‘3·1혁명론’
역사비평
2020 .02
-
‘비폭력의 스펙터클’을 넘어서 -3·1운동 100주년의 폭력론
역사비평
2019 .11
-
[일본근현대] 역사와 기억 사이에서, 전쟁과 평화 사이에서
역사학보
2020 .09
-
Achievements and Challenges in the Centennial Anniversary Studies of the March First Independence Movement
Korea Journal
2021 .03
-
일본 역사 교과서의 3 · 1운동 서술 분석
역사교육
2019 .09
-
3·1운동과 그 이후, 여성의 현실 참여
인문과학연구
2019 .01
-
3 · 1운동 관련 교과서 서술의 변천 분석
역사교육
2019 .09
-
영어와 한국어의 공범주 현상 비교 분석
현대영어영문학
2018 .01
-
7차 교육과정 이후 고등학교 <한국 근･현대사>･<한국사> 교과서의 1920년대 여성운동에 대한 서술 추이 연구
史叢(사총)
2024 .09
-
3·1운동 100년의 기억과 기념 - 3·1운동 100주년 기획위원회 좌담 -
역사와현실
2019 .12
-
3.1운동 경제배경 서술의 변화과정 분석
역사와현실
2018 .06
-
1920~30년대 전북의 독립운동과 3.1운동 세대
전북사학
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-911-003164482