지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper came up with the fact that various different opinions exist on the form of ‘VGeN’, reviewed each of those opinions, and reconsidered the function of ‘Ge’.
The core of the ‘VGeN’ format is ‘Ge’ for that reason, the past view of the function of the ‘Ge’ itself was first scrutinized. In the beginning, ‘Ge’ was simply viewed as a unit of counting or as a classifier, and some were described as a function of individuation. This report puts focus on the function of individuation and considers this in relation to the ‘VGeN’. Although it is also shown in the various examples presented in this report, ‘VGeN’ is no longer a function for simple numerical representation, nor does it serve as a classifier to classify certain nouns. A noun that has not received any quantity of modifier in a sentence simply represents the total classification of an object, but can be recognized as an objective object embodied through the process of individualization. However, even the object of the objectification is no longer biased by the noun at the back or by the verb at the front. Looking at the different combinations of ‘VGeN’ presented in the text, ‘Ge’ could no longer be combined solely with one side.
Along with this aspect, the fact that the object in Chinese can be omitted if it receives the formula of the quantity and the number is ‘one’ is also a potential feature that opens up the possibility of achieving the current ‘VGeN’ format. As these factors are used at high frequencies, the interior of the ‘VGeN’ is re-analyzed as shown in A: [ V[GeN] ] → B: [VGeN ], and thus a new function has been introduced.
Observations of past syntactic analyses were considered to be limited, so we considered the useful aspects of situations in which ‘VGeN’ is used in the example sentence, along with the above basic thought processes. We looked at various aspects of the speaker"s position in the environment, his purpose, his intention to ignite, and his recognition as a listener. Through these comprehensive observations and thoughts, this report reflected the psychology and attitude of the speaker to embody the actions, and emphasize them in the ‘VGeN’.
The core of the ‘VGeN’ format is ‘Ge’ for that reason, the past view of the function of the ‘Ge’ itself was first scrutinized. In the beginning, ‘Ge’ was simply viewed as a unit of counting or as a classifier, and some were described as a function of individuation. This report puts focus on the function of individuation and considers this in relation to the ‘VGeN’. Although it is also shown in the various examples presented in this report, ‘VGeN’ is no longer a function for simple numerical representation, nor does it serve as a classifier to classify certain nouns. A noun that has not received any quantity of modifier in a sentence simply represents the total classification of an object, but can be recognized as an objective object embodied through the process of individualization. However, even the object of the objectification is no longer biased by the noun at the back or by the verb at the front. Looking at the different combinations of ‘VGeN’ presented in the text, ‘Ge’ could no longer be combined solely with one side.
Along with this aspect, the fact that the object in Chinese can be omitted if it receives the formula of the quantity and the number is ‘one’ is also a potential feature that opens up the possibility of achieving the current ‘VGeN’ format. As these factors are used at high frequencies, the interior of the ‘VGeN’ is re-analyzed as shown in A: [ V[GeN] ] → B: [VGeN ], and thus a new function has been introduced.
Observations of past syntactic analyses were considered to be limited, so we considered the useful aspects of situations in which ‘VGeN’ is used in the example sentence, along with the above basic thought processes. We looked at various aspects of the speaker"s position in the environment, his purpose, his intention to ignite, and his recognition as a listener. Through these comprehensive observations and thoughts, this report reflected the psychology and attitude of the speaker to embody the actions, and emphasize them in the ‘VGeN’.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 선행연구
Ⅲ. ‘个’의 기능 재고 및 화용적 특성 탐색
Ⅳ. 맺는말
참고문헌
논문초록
참고문헌 (33)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
개 눈에는 뭐만 보여
주간경향
2025 .03
-
보편양사 ‘個’의 官話방언별 사용 양상 고찰: ‘条’, ‘件’, ‘朵’와 결합하는 무정명사를 중심으로
Journal of China Studies
2020 .01
-
中国个人信息保护法的立法进程与重点条款解读
연세법학
2021 .01
-
A Comparative Study of Consent Rules in the Personal Information Protection Laws of China and South Korea
국제거래와 법
2022 .10
-
日本における「忘れられる権利」に関する 裁判例および議論の状況
강원법학
2016 .10
-
‘개 60만원’ 보상 후 46만 마리는 어쩌나
주간경향
2024 .10
-
학문목적 한국어교육에서 개조식 문체 쓰기 교육을 위한 제언
한국어 교육
2015 .01
-
[EDITOR’s LETTER] 개를 먹는 나라에서 벗어나 개를 버리는 나라로?
한경BUSINESS
2024 .10
-
일본어의 명사문과 동사문의 경계에 관하여 －‘お명사문’을 중심으로－
일본언어문화
2019 .01
-
한국어 어휘 교육을 위한 명사 복합 구성 유형 연구
문법교육
2017 .01
-
일본어의 문 특징에 관한 일고찰- 「Nノコト」, 「Nノ(V)方」, 「N1ノN2」를 중심으로 -
비교일본학
2017 .01
-
GE의 지배구조와 국제조세전략
회계저널
2020 .01
-
고대 중국어 명사의 술어 활용에 관한 小考
동북아 문화연구
2024 .09
-
[Special Report PART 2] 타워크레인 노동자 오해와 진실_×묻은 개가 ×묻은 개 나무란 꼴일까
더스쿠프
2019 .11
-
중국어 회화교육 교수요목 연구- ‘책략능력(strategic competence)’향상을 위한 담화표지 교수요목을 중심으로
중국연구
2017 .01
-
[초점] 개님을 환영합니다~
넥스트 이코노미
2018 .07
-
화용 기능의 ‘又’
중국학보
2021 .08
-
日本語｢Ｖ+Ｎ｣型複合名詞の動作性に関する研究
일본언어문화
2016 .01
-
중학교 1학년 학습자의 추상명사 판별도 및 판단 준거 분석
문법교육
2022 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0