메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
황빛나 (한국학중앙연구원)
저널정보
한국미술연구소 미술사논단 美術史論壇 제48호
발행연도
2019.6
수록면
113 - 134 (22page)
DOI
10.14380/AHF.2019.48.113

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The term and concept of ‘Jingyeong(眞景)’, in addition to Japan’s liquidation of remnants after liberation, rediscovering it as a historical precursor to the recovery of Korean character, has been considered one of the most important concepts of the Korean Modernization, along with ‘Sasaeng(寫生)’ in relation to Jingyeong and Jeong Seon(鄭敾) in the latter part of the Joseon period. In this process, however, Sasaeng were also removed from the context of the “Jeonshin theory(傳神論)” used in East Asia before modern times, and there was a tendency to view ‘Sayi(寫意)’ and ‘Sasaeng’ in a dichotomous way and to understand Sayi in conjunction with the “Abstract Art” on modern times.
However, if the emphasis was placed on graphic depictions of the immediate object, such as painting education conducted under the early Meiji policy, it became more likely to incorporate the old modern narrative into the Western formation theory through the rediscovery boom of the Eastern tradition that took place through the Taisho(大正) at the end of the Meiji period. Thus, the hierarchical and informative differentiation of Sasaeng from the rudimentary level of objective Sasaeng for amateurs(children) to the subjective Sasaeng for professionals was published through the leading Japanese painters and the theorists and spread to East Asia.
In this paper, the two terms, ‘Jingyeong’ and ‘Sasaeng,’ have been traced through major literature and primary materials of the modern era to this day. Through this, the focus of understanding “truth” with a focus on “reality” and “reality” is a term derived from Japan’s “attraction painting(名所圖)” concept of evolution and the hybridization of Western landscape painting, and it aims to help expand the scope of understanding of modern Korean painting’s “truth” and “abstract art.”

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 두 개의 ‘사생’: 동서양 ‘사생’론과 ‘사생’의 단계성
Ⅲ. 다이쇼기 이후 사생 개념의 분화와 전개
Ⅳ. 맺음말: 진경(眞景)과 풍경(風景), 고와 금
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0