메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국중동학회 한국중동학회논총 한국중동학회논총 제31권 제2호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
43 - 70 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Despite half a century of multiparty politics, Turkey has showed a continuing elusiveness of democratic consolidation. This study argues that the failure of elite transformations and the absence of elite unity is the most determining explanatory variable to understand the unconsolidated democracy in Turkey. Some works correctly point out the importance of an elite settlement and convergence in the democratic transitions and breakdowns in Turkey instead of a hazy concept of low political institutionalization. Yet, this study still finds their seemingly elaborated elite-centered analysis wanting since they fail to provide crucial and comprehensive notions of elite theory in which democratization can best be understood by studying basic continuities and changes in the internal relations of national elites. Following the lead of Higley and Burton, this paper here intends to offer a more adequate explanation of the elite variable in the unstable regimes of Turkey and to contend that the elusiveness of consolidation is due to continuing elite disunity. The rationale is that unless regime changes are preceded or accompanied by elite transformations from disunity to consensual unity, they should be regarded as strictly temporary. Considering that elite transformations are highly contingent and procedural affairs, this study focuses on specific circumstances that have failed to trigger an elite settlement or convergence at several points of crisis in Turkey compared to the other successful cases.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (27)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0